Collingwood?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Collingwood?
That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.dragit wrote:How did you guess, I am both a 13 year old moron.SaintPav wrote:BTW, I really like your avatar. You're either 13 or a moron.
I won't ridicule you pav, you make a fool of yourself well enough on your own.
Why don't you tell us all how we should post a bit more, that's good fun.
I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Collingwood?
It will do. Touched a nerve have I.dragit wrote:correct… was a reference to Scotty Watters favourites…matrix wrote:maybe he likes waffles????
What sort of picture would you prefer pav?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
Re: Collingwood?
What don't you hear?SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.
I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
Take what? being called a moron?
You're really starting to babble… might be time for a nap.
- matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Collingwood?
ok im confused
how could you not read posts apart from the ones that are over the top?
you would have to read all the posts to determine what ones are over the top
anyhoo back to the important stuff
hmmmm
waffles.......
how could you not read posts apart from the ones that are over the top?
you would have to read all the posts to determine what ones are over the top
anyhoo back to the important stuff
hmmmm
waffles.......
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18838
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Re: Collingwood?
only if you go and eat a waffle.dragit wrote:What don't you hear?SaintPav wrote: That's not what I hear. Anyway, I don't even read your posts apart from the ones where you come over the top and have a snipe.
I just knew you wouldn't be able to take it.
Take what? being called a moron?
You're really starting to babble… might be time for a nap.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Collingwood?
winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
Seeya
*************
*************
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Re: Collingwood?
I can't find anything to say Armstrong tested positive...did find this which seems to suggest he didn't....sunsaint wrote:winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
http://news.yahoo.com/did-lance-armstro ... 38095.html
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Collingwood?
nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series ![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
![Neutral :|](./images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif)
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2358
- Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
- Location: East of Bentleigh
Re: Collingwood?
Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Collingwood?
people pick and choose to satisfy their biassunsaint wrote:winners are always 'target" tested by ASADA- the losers can just go on whingingSainterK wrote:Yes and no...
We can't forget that players were target tested by the AFL, and it would appear that nobody failed a test.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it extremely hard to test for such things in someones system?
The AFL needs to go about this another way, what that is, I'm not sure...
and the current fuss is over protein chains so yeah natural levels exist, & being close to those limits (as in HGH) set out by WADA is not a bannable offence
and when will people stop perpetuating the lie that Lance Armstrong never tested positive - he did - several times
'oh lance never tested positive so hes innocent'
'oh chinese 16yo with faster time than michael phelps didnt test positive but we all know she cheated'
Re: Collingwood?
ozrulestrace wrote:Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
U wot m8?
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Collingwood?
Collingwood are partners with the Holden Racing team - cars have to carry their logo-- check side window of the carOld Mate wrote:ozrulestrace wrote:Say what?saintbrat wrote:nice when as a football club you can afford to sponsor a Motor car in the V8 series
U wot m8?
http://www.news.com.au/sport/motor-spor ... 6575541048
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
![Image](http://www.saintsmembership.com.au/theme/afl-stkilda/img/how-i-want-to-be.png)
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
Re: Collingwood?
We're Collingwood players on the juice in 2010 ?
Is the pope catholic?
The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing
They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL
The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership
You know it makes sense
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
Is the pope catholic?
The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing
They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL
The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership
You know it makes sense
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Collingwood?
barks4eva
im on your side on this.
people can call me a sore loser or a conspiracy theorist all day long.
im on your side on this.
people can call me a sore loser or a conspiracy theorist all day long.
Re: Collingwood?
plus another.barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
![Image](http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo330/Iceman_234/feature-home.jpg)
Re: Collingwood?
Can we have a link to this statement? I know there were a couple of journos on the case, but I never saw an AFL statement.Iceman234 wrote:plus another.barks4eva wrote: The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
Fortius Quo Fidelius
Re: Collingwood?
Can' believe I agree with you re-Collingwood. Don't agree with your comments about the board though.barks4eva wrote:We're Collingwood players on the juice in 2010 ?
Is the pope catholic?
The AFL released a statement after the Grand FinalS that Collingwood players were detected with "slightly elevated levels" of a performance enhancing substance
You don't have to be Einstein to know why Dane Swan was target tested in 2011 at unprecedented levels and the substance he was taking is not detectable in urine samples which further explains his smugness with his comment about being too clever for the AFL
Do the maths and you'll find the squares are rooted
And our cheese eating surrender monkey board did nothing
They should have demanded a thorough independent investigation not run by the AFL
The filth should have been thoroughly investigated, exposed and found out to be the filthy scum cheats they are and would have a second premiership
You know it makes sense
St Kilda drew a Grand Finsl against a team on the juice
However, in light of recent events, I would like to add the 2009 Premiers to that also.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Collingwood?
i know its probably not politically correct but use of the word 'nuffy' always makes me laugh without fail.matrix wrote:a 13 year old nuffy by the sounds of it
but that could prob get you and in trouble
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)