Illicit drug loophole - which club?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294709Post plugger66 »

Eastern wrote:I'd be VERY SUPRISED if it was just Collingwood and it is ONLY 4 players !!

Of course there would be many more and it would probably be every club. I think that loophole will be closed tomorrow. I suppose the question that has to be asked is should the AFL even test for these type of drugs. I think they should myself but I can see other peoples point of view if thet said they shouldnt.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294714Post The Redeemer »

plugger66 wrote:
Eastern wrote:I'd be VERY SUPRISED if it was just Collingwood and it is ONLY 4 players !!

Of course there would be many more and it would probably be every club. I think that loophole will be closed tomorrow. I suppose the question that has to be asked is should the AFL even test for these type of drugs. I think they should myself but I can see other peoples point of view if thet said they shouldnt.
All clubs nation-wide have players taking recreational drugs.

All workplaces nation-wide have employees taking recreational drugs.

So be it. Just don't let it f*** up your performance as I am a paying customer via membership and expect the club that I support to be good enough not to get into crap like that.


fingers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4642
Joined: Thu 22 Sep 2005 11:17am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294724Post fingers »

It just surprises me that 4 players from one club self report - they take advantage of the loop hole without any advice from the club ? Doubt it.


CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10134
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 145 times
Been thanked: 1299 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294725Post CURLY »

fingers wrote:It just surprises me that 4 players from one club self report - they take advantage of the loop hole without any advice from the club ? Doubt it.
No Eddie said he has no idea at all about it. Why wouldn't you believe him! :shock:


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7781
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 497 times
Been thanked: 226 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294726Post bobmurray »

Eastern wrote:I'd be VERY SUPRISED if it was just Collingwood and it is ONLY 4 players !!
It was always going to be Druggywood the way Pert was carrying on, that filth lot talk in riddles when it's there own dung heap.

They moralise when it's someone else's problem....

never mind Ed......maybe you can sign up Pfizer as a sponsor of your state of the art training centre....


Six debutants for the Saints so far in Season 2024. :D
User avatar
bungiton
SS Life Member
Posts: 3536
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:43am
Location: Back in WA

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294730Post bungiton »

saintspremiers wrote:
bungiton wrote:A certain player from the club not mentioned turned up to his home town footy club presentation and dropped party biscuits in front of a number of people, only drama I have with it is when he was offering it to my then 15 yo daughter
Which club?
Sorry I haven't been sooner but it was a Collingwood player and I'd probably get steel shoved in my bottom or side if I name the player


Image
I'm sorry, you've gone through all the trouble to find out what this actually says and it really is quite insignificant.
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4245
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1393 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294733Post cwrcyn »

A few questions?

Are the Pies on the front foot, because they know what's really going on with their players? Why on earth would a Collingwood CEO make such bold statements, otherwise?

Did Adrian Anderson bail out because he knew the shite was going to hit the fan over drugs in the game?

Was Franklin's mystery 6-week injury last year anything other than an injury. Oh, but most players need rehab to get over an injury.

Are Richmond's recent comments regarding Dustin Martin anything to do with his white line fever?


In my opinion, the AFL is doing everything in it's power to hid the truth from the public, and had gone very soft on some players and clubs in order to protect the image of the game.







.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294739Post bergholt »

cwrcyn wrote:In my opinion, the AFL is doing everything in it's power to hid the truth from the public, and had gone very soft on some players and clubs in order to protect the image of the game.
"Some" clubs? If it's happening then it's all clubs, don't delude yourself that there are no Saints players who take recreational drugs.


oh when the
Club Player
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2012 1:03pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294743Post oh when the »

What about the swans player who said the afl had a drug problem
And was howled down and finished up quitting footy


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4245
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1393 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294746Post cwrcyn »

I think you're referring to Dale Lewis, who was working in the media at the time. Demetriou made sure he lost his job over those comments. Lewis was stitched up for telling the hard truth.










.


oh when the
Club Player
Posts: 681
Joined: Tue 07 Feb 2012 1:03pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294747Post oh when the »

Yep Dale deserves an apology


User avatar
SunburySaint
Club Player
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 2:47pm

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294749Post SunburySaint »

bungiton wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
bungiton wrote:A certain player from the club not mentioned turned up to his home town footy club presentation and dropped party biscuits in front of a number of people, only drama I have with it is when he was offering it to my then 15 yo daughter
Which club?
Sorry I haven't been sooner but it was a Collingwood player and I'd probably get steel shoved in my bottom or side if I name the player
I see what you did there....


Now lives in Geelong...
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18841
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1568 times
Been thanked: 1962 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294753Post SaintPav »

There are a number of misinformed posters on this issue who should think twice before posting. It can't be that hard to get some basic knowledge on the topic before expressing ill informed and non sensical views on an issue that involves ALL clubs.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
jays
Club Player
Posts: 1478
Joined: Sat 09 Aug 2008 10:58pm
Location: games
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294756Post jays »

lol pies


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294758Post Old Mate »

bungiton wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
bungiton wrote:A certain player from the club not mentioned turned up to his home town footy club presentation and dropped party biscuits in front of a number of people, only drama I have with it is when he was offering it to my then 15 yo daughter
Which club?
Sorry I haven't been sooner but it was a Collingwood player and I'd probably get steel shoved in my bottom or side if I name the player
ha ha well played


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294764Post matrix »

i cant believe the aflpa actually agreed to off season testing

what kind of morale crusade are they on ffs?
why should benny gale or luke ball or whoever the f*** is leading the aflpa care what the f*** i do during the off season?

might have worked on the car all day, done an engine change over
might have been in the yard all week, mowing weeding and planting etc
might have sat around and scratched my ass for 3 days watching movies
i then relaxed with a cold beer and smoked a joint

why the f*** should they care that i smoked a f****** join during the off season?
why the hell should they care that i decided to grab out the crack pipe and smoke some ice?

idiots, fancy agreeing to that ffs

its simple
every game a dozen or so players are randomly picked and tested test positive to what ever is on the banned drugs list youre gone

its not f****** hard is it
if you wanted the drugs out the sport you wouldnt of had the loop hole in the agreement
and dont go try to tell me the loophole was there so they could look after players that want to come out and get help
thye have shite loads of education and offer shite loads of help as an administration

the loophole was there becasue they know its rife
they know that some big named stars do drugs and do them lots

absolute farce


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18841
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1568 times
Been thanked: 1962 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294770Post SaintPav »

matrix wrote:i cant believe the aflpa actually agreed to off season testing

what kind of morale crusade are they on ffs?
why should benny gale or luke ball or whoever the f*** is leading the aflpa care what the f*** i do during the off season?

might have worked on the car all day, done an engine change over
might have been in the yard all week, mowing weeding and planting etc
might have sat around and scratched my ass for 3 days watching movies
i then relaxed with a cold beer and smoked a joint

why the f*** should they care that i smoked a f****** join during the off season?
why the hell should they care that i decided to grab out the crack pipe and smoke some ice?

idiots, fancy agreeing to that ffs

its simple
every game a dozen or so players are randomly picked and tested test positive to what ever is on the banned drugs list youre gone

its not f****** hard is it
if you wanted the drugs out the sport you wouldnt of had the loop hole in the agreement
and dont go try to tell me the loophole was there so they could look after players that want to come out and get help
thye have shite loads of education and offer shite loads of help as an administration

the loophole was there becasue they know its rife
they know that some big named stars do drugs and do them lots

absolute farce
The problem seems to be a bit more serious than smoking an ocassional joint. Unless you're trying to be sarcastic, the next point you make is bloody silly.

I do not understand the distinction you make between the regular and off season.

Education won't solve this problem alone.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294779Post plugger66 »

cwrcyn wrote:I think you're referring to Dale Lewis, who was working in the media at the time. Demetriou made sure he lost his job over those comments. Lewis was stitched up for telling the hard truth.










.

So you think 70% of footballers take drugs? It was way over the top but also way over the top is only 1% take them as well. My guess is about half the normal population percentage.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4245
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1393 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294781Post cwrcyn »

No I don't think more than 70% take drugs, and probably not during Dale Lewis's time in the game. My point is that people high up in the the AFL scoffed at (and took offence at) the mere fact that Lewis said that players were taking recreational drugs. Lewis was a popular player who was in the actual AFL system and was in a position to make a call on what he had seen. He wasn't being mischievous, but responding to a question someone put to him. He lost his job for being honest. Some people keep their high paid jobs in the AFL for being dishonest.

Unfortunately, recreational drug use is commonplace among 18 to 35 year-olds these days. Why would it not be among AFL players, who have plenty of spare time and cash compared to most people their age? I'd day your suggested figure of 50% would be unsurprising within the AFL and is probably close to the mark.

Although I've suggested that Eddie Maguire has gone on the front foot because he knows his club has a problem, I'm glad that he and Gary Pert have done so, as it's definitely a problem across the board. Why was it reported on this site that Sam Fisher was in Thailand and not at pre-season training? After recent newspaper reports, that worries me.










.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294783Post plugger66 »

cwrcyn wrote:No I don't think more than 70% take drugs, and probably not during Dale Lewis's time in the game. My point is that people high up in the the AFL scoffed at (and took offence at) the mere fact that Lewis said that players were taking recreational drugs. Lewis was a popular player who was in the actual AFL system and was in a position to make a call on what he had seen. He wasn't being mischievous, but responding to a question someone put to him. He lost his job for being honest. Some people keep their high paid jobs in the AFL for being dishonest.

Unfortunately, recreational drug use is commonplace among 18 to 35 year-olds these days. Why would it not be among AFL players, who have plenty of spare time and cash compared to most people their age? I'd day your suggested figure of 50% would be unsurprising within the AFL and is probably close to the mark.

Although I've suggested that Eddie Maguire has gone on the front foot because he knows his club has a problem, I'm glad that he and Gary Pert have done so, as it's definitely a problem across the board. Why was it reported on this site that Sam Fisher was in Thailand and not at pre-season training? After recent newspaper reports, that worries me.


Firstly was Dale Lewis sacked from his job because of what he said? I have never seen or heard that before. And because Lewis said such a ridiculous figure he was scoffed at. Maybe if he said 10-20% people would have listened. There is no way it would be near 50%. I never suggested that figure or maybe I did if that is the national average They may have the money but I doubt they would be anywhere near the national average. They are elite sports people and that is why they drink no where near what they previously did. I dont think you can then assume they take drugs because they cant drink.

I have no idea about the Sam Fisher. I said he was in Thailand but it was their break. He was there for a wedding. I cant see a problem with that.






.


User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294793Post Eastern »

matrix wrote:i cant believe the aflpa actually agreed to off season testing

what kind of morale crusade are they on ffs?
why should benny gale or luke ball or whoever the f*** is leading the aflpa care what the f*** i do during the off season?

might have worked on the car all day, done an engine change over
might have been in the yard all week, mowing weeding and planting etc
might have sat around and scratched my ass for 3 days watching movies
i then relaxed with a cold beer and smoked a joint

why the f*** should they care that i smoked a f****** join during the off season?
why the hell should they care that i decided to grab out the crack pipe and smoke some ice?

idiots, fancy agreeing to that ffs

its simple
every game a dozen or so players are randomly picked and tested test positive to what ever is on the banned drugs list youre gone

its not f****** hard is it
if you wanted the drugs out the sport you wouldnt of had the loop hole in the agreement
and dont go try to tell me the loophole was there so they could look after players that want to come out and get help
thye have shite loads of education and offer shite loads of help as an administration

the loophole was there becasue they know its rife
they know that some big named stars do drugs and do them lots

absolute farce
WHY? Because the AFL give the AFLPA around $12Mill pa to run their association/programs. What the AFL wants from the AFLPA, the AFL gets !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4245
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1393 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294825Post cwrcyn »

Maybe my timing was wrong about Fisher, but I recall the post about him being in Thailand was in a period when the rest of the players were in full training. Glad to hear his absence was for a wedding.








.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294826Post plugger66 »

cwrcyn wrote:Maybe my timing was wrong about Fisher, but I recall the post about him being in Thailand was in a period when the rest of the players were in full training. Glad to hear his absence was for a wedding.








.

Reece Carters wedding. Matt Ferguson was also there as well as Grammy and the 2 Pendlebury's. Not sure that will fill you with confidence.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8376
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 1169 times

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294830Post Devilhead »

Gotta love Demetriou - on 3AW he said he was unaware of how many players had self-reported - he then says the loophole is not being abused to the extent reported based on the briefings I have had from our medical officers,"

How the hell can he not know how many players have self reported given he apparently knows the loophole is not being abused as per the briefing by his medical officers - surely that's the first question you ask - How many players have self reported??

Sprung bad flat out lying!!


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Eastern
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14357
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
Location: 3132
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Illicit drug loophole - which club?

Post: # 1294858Post Eastern »

bungiton wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:
bungiton wrote:A certain player from the club not mentioned turned up to his home town footy club presentation and dropped party biscuits in front of a number of people, only drama I have with it is when he was offering it to my then 15 yo daughter
Which club?
Sorry I haven't been sooner but it was a Collingwood player and I'd probably get steel shoved in my bottom or side if I name the player
The Goulburn Valley Highway between Kialla & Yaroweah is a nice drive !!


NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!

Image
Post Reply