Brodie Murdoch

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292289Post Con Gorozidis »

Image

Image


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19105
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2019 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292290Post SaintPav »

stinger wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:
If I was at a party and was about to 'engage' a nice female, pluggs would step in and start talking about the complications of gonorrhea.

I've had plenty of "mates" try and pull that sort of crap on me over the years.
you mix with the wrong people then......never happened to me
nah, just blokes being competitive and I'm married now so it's not relevant but you're too good. :wink:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
st_Trav_ofWA
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8886
Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
Location: Perth
Contact:

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292292Post st_Trav_ofWA »

plugger66 wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?

Many and unlike many here I dont bag them. maybe you should have a go at the people who constantly bag players instead of me who hasnt said anything negative about them. How the hell would I know a thing about this guy. I didnt bag him I just said it will depend what he does in games more than his build. Con does have strange reasons for thinking a guy will be good.
never said you were bagging out any players just asking a legit question as you seem to be very quick to jump on people who are excited about any player ... as for having a go at you if you really think that that was me having a go at you then lord help us if i ever do have a go at you


"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans

http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292295Post Con Gorozidis »

How come every thread ends up being about plugger!


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19105
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2019 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292298Post SaintPav »

Con Gorozidis wrote:How come every thread ends up being about plugger!
I thought it was about you. :wink:


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7919
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 546 times
Been thanked: 246 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292311Post bobmurray »

Con Gorozidis wrote:How come every thread ends up being about plugger!
Thats what happens when someone is trying to clock 30,000 posts


Will we pick up a player in the SSP window :?:
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292314Post dragit »

I really liked what I saw in his brother when we played Geelong, be rapt if Brodie is along the same lines.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292328Post bergholt »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?
I dunno how people get excited about guys who haven't played a game yet. We all know most of them don't make it. Allen, Sweeney, Raymond, Howard, Watts, Miles, Connors, Ferguson, Cahill, Smith, Heyne, Winmar, Johnson, Crocker. I'm sure most of these guys were "exciting" at some point in the last five years and they played about 5 games between them all. So I have trouble looking at any of the zero gamers on the list now and getting excited about them.

That said, once they play a few reasonable games... Siposs is the one for me right now.


Kickit
Club Player
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed 12 Dec 2012 8:52pm

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292330Post Kickit »

Image
Murdoc
Last edited by Kickit on Thu 10 Jan 2013 11:09pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19105
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2019 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292331Post SaintPav »

bobmurray wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:How come every thread ends up being about plugger!
Thats what happens when someone is trying to clock 30,000 posts
Nice cheapie Bob. Good on ya. Ever post anything of substance? Show me a post.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292333Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
I thought it's because Con gets pumped and is plain excited. Isn't that a reason?

Yes that he why he posts I would think. I was more talking about some of the strange reasons a player will or will not make it. This one isnt so strange but there has been a few. I still stand by my comment that I dont bag players. And to answer Travs question the players i have excited about who are youngish are Steven, Ferg, Siposs, Newnes, Ben and Saad.

I thought you said Ferg was a long way off and Saad wasn't going to get any better and isn't that great, but I do concede you said Jack Steven wasn't worthy of questioning about his dark lines under his eyes and that you have claimed Ben should be captain of the Saints for the future. I guess you assume he can't be any good because he didn't go top 10 in the draft. Didn't you start bagging Kosi by the end of the season too?


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292351Post plugger66 »

gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
I thought it's because Con gets pumped and is plain excited. Isn't that a reason?

Yes that he why he posts I would think. I was more talking about some of the strange reasons a player will or will not make it. This one isnt so strange but there has been a few. I still stand by my comment that I dont bag players. And to answer Travs question the players i have excited about who are youngish are Steven, Ferg, Siposs, Newnes, Ben and Saad.

I thought you said Ferg was a long way off and Saad wasn't going to get any better and isn't that great, but I do concede you said Jack Steven wasn't worthy of questioning about his dark lines under his eyes and that you have claimed Ben should be captain of the Saints for the future. I guess you assume he can't be any good because he didn't go top 10 in the draft. Didn't you start bagging Kosi by the end of the season too?

As usual Gringo you dont actually read what is said. I have never said Ferg is a long way off. I said he cant play this year unless upgraded and isnt ready to play KP. I also never said any such thing about Saad. Now that is a complete lie but I am used to it from you. I shouldnt say lie you just imagine what is written. And I have never said you cant get stars from outside the top 10. Another lie. And if bagging a player is saying he is struggling for form then yes I did. Strange but I doubt that is bagging IMO. I reckon calling a 200 game player a dud is more like bagging. Now Gringo happy to show me any posts of what you have claimed otherwise you are just a liar.


User avatar
Cairnsman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7377
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
Location: Everywhere
Has thanked: 189 times
Been thanked: 276 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292354Post Cairnsman »

Con Gorozidis wrote:in the old days p66 - as Im sure you are aware we would say he was 'built like a brick sh*thouse'



Image

Man who paint toilet not necessarily sh1thouse painter.


elizabethr
Club Player
Posts: 882
Joined: Tue 04 Oct 2011 10:58pm
Location: qld
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 48 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292413Post elizabethr »

Comparisons are odious....


nothing to say
User avatar
Dr Spaceman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 14102
Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
Has thanked: 104 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292420Post Dr Spaceman »

elizabethr wrote:Comparisons are odious....
Image


And that thing's odorous :P


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8146
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 617 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292426Post magnifisaint »

bergholt wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?
I dunno how people get excited about guys who haven't played a game yet. We all know most of them don't make it. Allen, Sweeney, Raymond, Howard, Watts, Miles, Connors, Ferguson, Cahill, Smith, Heyne, Winmar, Johnson, Crocker. I'm sure most of these guys were "exciting" at some point in the last five years and they played about 5 games between them all. So I have trouble looking at any of the zero gamers on the list now and getting excited about them.

That said, once they play a few reasonable games... Siposs is the one for me right now.
It's called optimism


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Team Tommy
Club Player
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue 15 Dec 2009 2:21pm
Location: Earth

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292430Post Team Tommy »

SaintPav wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:How come every thread ends up being about plugger!
Thats what happens when someone is trying to clock 30,000 posts
Nice cheapie Bob. Good on ya. Ever post anything of substance? Show me a post.
I have certainly not seen one. Well not that I can remember anyway.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292465Post gringo »

plugger66 wrote:
gringo wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Yes that he why he posts I would think. I was more talking about some of the strange reasons a player will or will not make it. This one isnt so strange but there has been a few. I still stand by my comment that I dont bag players. And to answer Travs question the players i have excited about who are youngish are Steven, Ferg, Siposs, Newnes, Ben and Saad.

I thought you said Ferg was a long way off and Saad wasn't going to get any better and isn't that great, but I do concede you said Jack Steven wasn't worthy of questioning about his dark lines under his eyes and that you have claimed Ben should be captain of the Saints for the future. I guess you assume he can't be any good because he didn't go top 10 in the draft. Didn't you start bagging Kosi by the end of the season too?

As usual Gringo you dont actually read what is said. I have never said Ferg is a long way off. I said he cant play this year unless upgraded and isnt ready to play KP. I also never said any such thing about Saad. Now that is a complete lie but I am used to it from you. I shouldnt say lie you just imagine what is written. And I have never said you cant get stars from outside the top 10. Another lie. And if bagging a player is saying he is struggling for form then yes I did. Strange but I doubt that is bagging IMO. I reckon calling a 200 game player a dud is more like bagging. Now Gringo happy to show me any posts of what you have claimed otherwise you are just a liar.

Not a liar just too time poor to spend half an hour trawling through the pages of trash to prove a point. I struggle to read any thread that goes for more than a page so that's not going to happen. I'd rather let you feel right than do that Sheriff.


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7919
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 546 times
Been thanked: 246 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292467Post bobmurray »

SaintPav wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:How come every thread ends up being about plugger!
Thats what happens when someone is trying to clock 30,000 posts
Nice cheapie Bob. Good on ya. Ever post anything of substance? Show me a post.
Why ?


Will we pick up a player in the SSP window :?:
User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7919
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 546 times
Been thanked: 246 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292468Post bobmurray »

Team Tommy wrote:
SaintPav wrote:
bobmurray wrote:
Thats what happens when someone is trying to clock 30,000 posts
Nice cheapie Bob. Good on ya. Ever post anything of substance? Show me a post.
I have certainly not seen one. Well not that I can remember anyway.
39 posts...it's lucky you remember how to log on here


Will we pick up a player in the SSP window :?:
kimberly saint
Club Player
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2011 8:05pm
Location: Australia

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292469Post kimberly saint »

magnifisaint wrote:
bergholt wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?
I dunno how people get excited about guys who haven't played a game yet. We all know most of them don't make it. Allen, Sweeney, Raymond, Howard, Watts, Miles, Connors, Ferguson, Cahill, Smith, Heyne, Winmar, Johnson, Crocker. I'm sure most of these guys were "exciting" at some point in the last five years and they played about 5 games between them all. So I have trouble looking at any of the zero gamers on the list now and getting excited about them.

That said, once they play a few reasonable games... Siposs is the one for me right now.
It's called optimism
We get excited cause all part being a supporter, dreaming of the next big thing for the sainters . Don't kill the dream brother

Sum people walk away from a 5 point win happy as pig in s...t others walk away talking about how we should one by more and complaing about stuff ups :wink:


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292514Post bergholt »

kimberly saint wrote:We get excited cause all part being a supporter, dreaming of the next big thing for the sainters . Don't kill the dream brother

Sum people walk away from a 5 point win happy as pig in s...t others walk away talking about how we should one by more and complaing about stuff ups :wink:
Fair point well made! I'm in the second category, needless to say...


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8584
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1533 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292524Post kosifantutti »

bobmurray wrote:I know the Saints didn't think he'd last until that pick in the draft.......
We say that about almost every player. I'm pretty sure they were surprised that Kosi lasted to number 2.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18636
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1980 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292525Post bigcarl »

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?
The glass is perpetually half empty for Plugger, I'm afraid.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Brodie Murdoch

Post: # 1292526Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:
st_Trav_ofWA wrote:just a question Plugger66 out of curiosity is there any player on the saints list that has you somewhat excited about ?
The glass is perpetually half empty for Plugger, I'm afraid.

Why would you say that? because i wait until I see them play? I go into every single game thinking we can win. Pretty sure that isnt half empty. just because i like logical reason why a person rates an unknown doesnt make me negative.


Post Reply