Daniel Rich
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Fri 20 Jan 2012 4:57pm
- Has thanked: 2043 times
- Been thanked: 1162 times
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Daniel Rich
Rich has a pretty bad record if I remember correctly. Maybe 1-2 !!plugger66 wrote:Maybe one or a reprimand
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
![Image](http://i116.photobucket.com/albums/o23/saintbrat/9c94369c.jpg)
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2917
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 119 times
Re: Daniel Rich
Did Walker from Adelaide get reported for pushing opponent into goal post ?Winmar wrote:It's the kind of thing that should be stamped out. If it's not it will encourage other players to do similar.
To me it is the same thing
Re: Daniel Rich
When Brad Scott pushed an already out of play Lenny Hayes DELIBERATELY into a fence causing a broken wrist, Andrew Demetriou came out and stated on 3AW Brad Scott had apologised so no further action would occur.
All Rich has to do apparently is apologise and under AFL precedent he will get off. Maybe Wellingham should have tried that, maybe Judd should.
All Rich has to do apparently is apologise and under AFL precedent he will get off. Maybe Wellingham should have tried that, maybe Judd should.
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sun 26 Aug 2007 1:16pm
Re: Daniel Rich
You mean before the MRP existed?joffaboy wrote:When Brad Scott pushed an already out of play Lenny Hayes DELIBERATELY into a fence causing a broken wrist, Andrew Demetriou came out and stated on 3AW Brad Scott had apologised so no further action would occur.
All Rich has to do apparently is apologise and under AFL precedent he will get off. Maybe Wellingham should have tried that, maybe Judd should.
That was what, 7 years ago?
7 Years ago you could hit a guy in the head and get away with it..
Re: Daniel Rich
it's not a court of law - there's no "precedent".joffaboy wrote:All Rich has to do apparently is apologise and under AFL precedent he will get off.