Defence horribly exposed

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Watts the Buzz
Club Player
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun 19 Feb 2012 1:26pm

Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230192Post Watts the Buzz »

I along with a few others feel that our defence is our achilles heel this year and I thought in the first half we were made to look really second rate the way we just kept leaking really easy goals and I think that's where we lost the game. Worst game I've seen Mr. Consistency Blakey play for a long long time, Gwilt is still miles off it, Fish will take a couple of games to get his touch back, Raph was fumbling and falling over and I think we missed the composure of our least experienced defender Tommy Simpkin tonight.

We made amends in the second half and played a lot tighter but we need to be better than what we displayed in that first half if we consider ourselves serious contenders. Thought Geary gave us a lift when he came on and I think he's too good a player to be sub.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4922
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 336 times
Been thanked: 483 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230213Post Moods »

Completely disagree.

Our fwds cost us the game tonight. Had plenty of opportunities to win us the match and they stuffed it up. Mids gave them enough supply to get the job done I thought. The way the game was played it moved really quickly on the rebound from end to end. I thought Dempster was quite good, liked Gilbert's game, Gwilt played well on Tippett considering what he was giving away in height and weight, Fish got better and better as the night wore on, was happy with Clarkes games, and thought that Gears played really well when he came on. Blakey was the only one who was disappointing. BJ had a poor night as well down there.

Easy to blame the defenders when we lose and everyone ALWAYS points the finger at the mids. For mine it was the fwds fault tonight. Kos was awful, Milne only redeemed himself at the end, but is too often missing easy shots, Roo was quiet, Milera was poor, and Schneides played well. Siposs got better as the night went on.


User avatar
dcstkfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4584
Joined: Mon 12 Jun 2006 9:37pm
Location: St Kilda

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230225Post dcstkfc »

I'm somewhere in between. I reckon we were the better side between the arcs but their forward line was better than ours.


STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.

‎''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230231Post ShanghaiSaint »

yep if we kicked 50% better game would have been ours.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
battye
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5926
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 1:36pm
Contact:

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230237Post battye »

I also agree that the game was lost in the back half. Yeah we missed a lot of easy shots (probably would have won had we snared them), but equally had the defence not been stationary on countless occasions then Adelaide wouldn't have scored so freely. How many times did they kick a goal from an uncontested mark? I'll bet it was a number of times more than we did.


Feature article: KFC's "Double Down" burger!

TV Ratings: Hey Hey It's Saturday ratings overview

Do you know what C# is? .NET? Then you need to know this: XSD
Watts the Buzz
Club Player
Posts: 172
Joined: Sun 19 Feb 2012 1:26pm

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230256Post Watts the Buzz »

Agree that the forwards overall were pretty average as well - in fact it's difficult to understand how we got as close as we did given that we had so many players down - midfield definitely kept us in it, primarily Dal who played a ripper. Got to give us a lot of heart to know that we lost by under a goal against a premiership favourite and there is soooooo much room for improvement; consider also that were playing interstate and coming off numerous six day breaks.

Still think the defence was sub standard in that first half though - I know the ball was bouncing around a lot from end to end but to have conceded nearly 100 points by only half time just isn't good enough.


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230293Post Griggsy »

Defense is an issue. Blake can't take the key forward and Gwilt looks slow. I was confused at one point Gilbert was in a 1v2 for way too long, made a great effort but no help came and ended in a crows goal.

I get it to a degree with a different style of play but they really need to work it all out


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230301Post Old Mate »

Big forwards monstering our backs is a common pattern this year.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230337Post BigMart »

No KPD was highlighted in November....

But it was more about the ease at which Fwds found the ball in D50. Defenders zoning off and pointing fingers is common in the back half.

Rutten, Shaw, Talia..... That's how you play back


User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230350Post Rosco »

Old Mate wrote:Big forwards monstering our backs is a common pattern this year.
This. The back unit is good when the third man gets to the contest, but we are horribly lacking a key back. It was a good thing that Tippett and Walker can't kick straight or could have been more ugly at 3q time.


The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230351Post The OtherThommo »

Oh bulls***, BM. They won by half a kick and we butchered scoring op's. Roo was in the rooms b4 1/4 time being tested - ergo we didn't have our front half in tact. Yet, we lost by half a kick. Talia's a hack, Rutten's a witch's hat and they won because they converted - we didn't, it's simple.

Or, to put it another way, with a modicum of luck and poise, we do a side with massive momentum on their own dungheap, comfortably. Now listen carefully - they will trouble no-one from now on. But, we will.


'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230355Post kalsaint »

Moods wrote:Completely disagree.

Our fwds cost us the game tonight. Had plenty of opportunities to win us the match and they stuffed it up. Mids gave them enough supply to get the job done I thought. The way the game was played it moved really quickly on the rebound from end to end. I thought Dempster was quite good, liked Gilbert's game, Gwilt played well on Tippett considering what he was giving away in height and weight, Fish got better and better as the night wore on, was happy with Clarkes games, and thought that Gears played really well when he came on. Blakey was the only one who was disappointing. BJ had a poor night as well down there.

Easy to blame the defenders when we lose and everyone ALWAYS points the finger at the mids. For mine it was the fwds fault tonight. Kos was awful, Milne only redeemed himself at the end, but is too often missing easy shots, Roo was quiet, Milera was poor, and Schneides played well. Siposs got better as the night went on.
Forward conversion was poor but 103 points by Adelaide by 3/4 time is unacceptable. Quick trransition from the midfiled to forwards caned the defence early. This is clearly the midfields and rucks resposnibility and accountability to stem the flow and at least put pressure on opposition ball players. Same thing happened in the match against the Eagles. Cox had a field day with unpressured ball delivery. I note the defence was short that day but no one could beat forwards when precision clearances give the opposition a huge advantage like that. Guess what we came back in that game too but didnt get the 4 points. Needs consistency from midfield. Id rucks dont perform get another on baller IMO.

This radically improved after half time but we always playing catch up and the forwards didnt help the cause at that time.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230367Post BigMart »

Did they convert well in the last.... Do you know why we got within a point.... They kicked 6 straight behinds.. Two of them go through, we roll over.

You judge a defender by their opponents effectiveness OK

Kosi and Nick
15 possessions, 9 marks, 2.3 goals between them.

Walker and Tippett
Had slightly better games yeah, not sure their exact stats... But 7.6 goals I think??

If Rutten is a witches hat.... Let's use one next game


The OtherThommo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5062
Joined: Sun 27 Feb 2005 2:30am
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 125 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230395Post The OtherThommo »

Our conversion deficiencies in the first 3 quarters gave them the break - their errors in the last were incidental. Kosi, Riewoldt and Milne missed within 10 minutes to give us the lead in the 2nd, yet they counter punched and we looked like falling apart - but we don't.


'I have no new illusions, and I have no old illusions' - Vladimir Putin, Geneva, June 2021
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8391
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230439Post Devilhead »

They kicked quite a few the difficult ones and we missed the quite a few easy ones - welcome to the Saints!!


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230447Post Junction Oval »

On the topic of defense, agree that our mids were slaughted early on, putting lots of pressure on the backs.

However, the lack of pressure and body-on-body contact by our backline was a very poor effort. We looked dis-organised and under-sized down there. Gwilt is looking very slow and lacking confidence. We let them get away early, which was collectively a poor effort. The bye is much needed.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9124
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 436 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230473Post spert »

The defence was put under too much pressure early in the game by the winning Crow midfield, as our mids again were flat-footed early and didn't hit their stride until too late in the game. We need another big body in defence and that's a recruiting issue.


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230508Post borderbarry »

I believe we lost the game because of our disposal. Not only were we poor at kicking for goal, but our field kicking was pathetic compared with theirs as well.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230511Post SainterK »

You are so right Barry.

Turnovers.

Time to really assess the poorer kicks in the side and if they suit this game plan or not.


The Redeemer
SS Life Member
Posts: 2622
Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230515Post The Redeemer »

The OtherThommo wrote:Oh bulls***, BM. They won by half a kick and we butchered scoring op's. Roo was in the rooms b4 1/4 time being tested - ergo we didn't have our front half in tact. Yet, we lost by half a kick. Talia's a hack, Rutten's a witch's hat and they won because they converted - we didn't, it's simple.

Or, to put it another way, with a modicum of luck and poise, we do a side with massive momentum on their own dungheap, comfortably. Now listen carefully - they will trouble no-one from now on. But, we will.
They missed some easy ones too.....

What is the point in troubling a team when we do not get the 4 points? nothing...


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230524Post SainterK »

Just listening to SEN's crunch time interview.

The voice over had Geary involved in two of the late goals?

Can't quite recall much of the rush of the last quarter, was he significant to the comeback?

I hope he is back in next week.


spert
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9124
Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
Location: A distant beach
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 436 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230536Post spert »

I hope Geary and Simpkin are in the team.


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8089
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230548Post magnifisaint »

BigMart wrote:Did they convert well in the last.... Do you know why we got within a point.... They kicked 6 straight behinds.. Two of them go through, we roll over.

You judge a defender by their opponents effectiveness OK

Kosi and Nick
15 possessions, 9 marks, 2.3 goals between them.

Walker and Tippett
Had slightly better games yeah, not sure their exact stats... But 7.6 goals I think??

If Rutten is a witches hat.... Let's use one next game
Open you're eyes dingbat. Look at the first 3 quarters and you'll see that they were kicking them out of their arse. They weren't missing any of them whereas Milne, Riewoldt and Kossie were missing dead in front. Kick those and there's a little scoreboard pressure. Sure they missed a few in the last when it didn't matter but in the first 3 quarters they hardly missed. You are such a negative egotistical moron!


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8089
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230550Post magnifisaint »

SainterK wrote:Just listening to SEN's crunch time interview.

The voice over had Geary involved in two of the late goals?

Can't quite recall much of the rush of the last quarter, was he significant to the comeback?

I hope he is back in next week.
Got us back in the game in the last. He played well and is a good footballer


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Defence horribly exposed

Post: # 1230554Post BigMart »

Tippett could have kicked 8... He missed three sodas

Did you only notice the shots we missed??

Rutten and Talia did what backmen should do.... Stop their opponents
Blake and Gwilt were pantsed


Post Reply