We should make a play for a backman

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3620 times
Been thanked: 2893 times

We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225938Post skeptic »

We seem to have the nucleus of a good side...

McEvoy approaching his prime with Stanley coming on (though more ruck depth is def req)

Our star mids continue to persevere with promising new talent in Steven, Armitage, and a few other potentials

Got some run in the forward line and a few emerging medium sized backman too

We don't however have a great KPP backman and don't really have anyone coming through.

I know it's meant to be a super draft but even if we take one with our first pick, he'll still be 3-4yrs away minimum + Blake will retire soon one would imagine and Simpkin isn't the right size.
I imagine we want to persevere with Rhys as forward/ruck rather than def (though I wouldn't mind seeing it in the preseason... afterall how many tall KP running FB are there?)

Gilbert can't play key back... nor can Dempster.

Losing Dawson for nothing really hurt.

IMO with the right management, this squad can have a crack at a flag next season (though I also think we're a show this season with no clear standout) providing we fill some holes and the youngsters continue to improve.

In my opinon we should make a play for a full back trade some players to ease cap space if need be. Really find it hard to believe that we're so stretched in the salary cap... gotta wonder wehre that money is going

A Frawley/Trengrove... maybe even a Silvagni (though he's not as good but would be cheaper esp if he remains on the outs overthere)


User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225944Post groupie1 »

Simpkin is the new Max Hudghton... who ended up playing a career as full-back; with Penny, Shanahan, Dawson, even Gehrig in between. I know there is a size differential but Hudghton made a career of it.
I personally don't see the need for a monster FB anymore. Between Gilbert/Fisher/Blake/Gwilt and Simpkin there is enough height to cover as long as we always get a third man back to cover. one-on-one Simpkin shows good smarts.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1274
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225945Post groupie1 »

although, if we could trade Montagna for the Adelaide defender who left for one of the new teams, I'd be up for that, in anticipation of a Blake retirement.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16977
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3620 times
Been thanked: 2893 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225946Post skeptic »

Hudghton was a freak though

not many could do what he did


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225947Post WinnersOnly »

groupie1 wrote:Simpkin is the new Max Hudghton... who ended up playing a career as full-back; with Penny, Shanahan, Dawson, even Gehrig in between. I know there is a size differential but Hudghton made a career of it.
I personally don't see the need for a monster FB anymore. Between Gilbert/Fisher/Blake/Gwilt and Simpkin there is enough height to cover as long as we always get a third man back to cover. one-on-one Simpkin shows good smarts.
So you wouldnt want Taylor or Lonegan Geelong, Glass Schofield or McKenzie WCE, Rutten Crows, Pears or Fletcher Bombers, Brown Pies - point is they are all talls who play tall. We have no one to play on the larger key forwards!


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225950Post matrix »

is there a mid year draft??


User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225963Post borderbarry »

No midyear draft.
Jackson Ferguson, at 194cm, seems to be coming along nicely. Might be ready to be blooded next season.


Hallalj#3
Club Player
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 2:38pm

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225966Post Hallalj#3 »

borderbarry wrote:No midyear draft.
Jackson Ferguson, at 194cm, seems to be coming along nicely. Might be ready to be blooded next season.
Good call.. Looks the goods..


User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225967Post matrix »

wow
theres no mid year draft


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225981Post BigMart »

Ferguson plays a lot like Gilbert.... Tall running utility who can mark. But is not KPP size

We have a glut of medium/tall defenders.... Not one power defender


maverick
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5018
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:42am
Location: Bayside
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1225999Post maverick »

A few teams need them, who is a realistic target?


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226005Post gringo »

groupie1 wrote:although, if we could trade Montagna for the Adelaide defender who left for one of the new teams, I'd be up for that, in anticipation of a Blake retirement.

Is that Bock? Hasn't he done a Goose Mc Guire on his leg? Jay Lever is a potential long term FB


PJ
SS Life Member
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun 14 Dec 2008 10:31am
Location: Adelaide

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226006Post PJ »

i'd like to think Ferg will get a crack next year. If Watters keeps building the team defence I don't think you need a stand out gorilla. our defence is still not whole at atm. Fisher = absent, Gwilt = not quite up to speed but improving, Newnes = developing, Geary = injured. Plenty of up side


I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8089
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226008Post magnifisaint »

BigMart wrote:Ferguson plays a lot like Gilbert.... Tall running utility who can mark. But is not KPP size

We have a glut of medium/tall defenders.... Not one power defender
194cm isn't big enough for you?


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30092
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226010Post saintsRrising »

groupie1 wrote:Simpkin is the new Max Hudghton... who ended up playing a career as full-back; with Penny, Shanahan, Dawson, even Gehrig in between. I know there is a size differential but Hudghton made a career of it.
.

Sorry but why?

Max had enormous closing speed, and could reel in forwards that had jumped away from him. Simpkin simply does not.

Max became one of the best spoilers ever....maybe Simpkin will, and maybe not...but he does not have Max's speed.

Simpkin is undersized to play FB. He does not have Max's spped...or Trevor Barkers magnifcent leap.... or Mal Michael enormous strength.

Simpkin is not the new "Max", but he can be the new "Blake" who takes the third tall, medium or occasional small.

Big forwards have been monstering us this season... Buddy, Cox, Riewoldt....

Even Anthony who has done nothing for years came on and kicked 2 goals against us.

Our other tall backs in Fisher and Gilbert are more interceptors than Full backs.

We need a genuine Full Back to complement them.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30092
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226014Post saintsRrising »

magnifisaint wrote:
BigMart wrote:Ferguson plays a lot like Gilbert.... Tall running utility who can mark. But is not KPP size

We have a glut of medium/tall defenders.... Not one power defender
194cm isn't big enough for you?
I think he means musle mass.
Ferg is very young.
It is no accident that FB' often hit there straps when they area bit older and muscled up.

There are exceptions like Max and Fletcher.

Ferg I have great hopus for..but at seasons start he was only 85kg. That may take at least another two pre-seasons to muscle up. He may well however be more suited to CHB than FB.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226018Post Richter »

Whilst a rady made KPP back would be a handy addition, I don't think it is an area where we would get enough bang for our buck right now. Retaining Stanley and BJ, and recruiting a 18 yo potential CHF and mids to take over from our core (Roo, Kosi, Lenny, Joey, Dal) who will be retiring over the next 2-5 years is more important.

Roo, Kosi ---- Stanley, Siposs, Markworth... one or two more prospects would be nice over the next two drafts
Milne ----- Saad, Milera... already covered this year

Lenny, Joey, Dal ---- Ross, Ledger, Cripps... 2 or 3 more would be good as we have no clue how good any of these boys will turn out to be

Ruck --- a mature back up and a lower end draftee would be sensible

Tall backman

I count that as being 8 over the next 2 years... about right and with a supposed super draft just the right timing for us.
Last edited by Richter on Sun 03 Jun 2012 12:55pm, edited 1 time in total.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226020Post Richter »

saintsRrising wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
BigMart wrote:Ferguson plays a lot like Gilbert.... Tall running utility who can mark. But is not KPP size

We have a glut of medium/tall defenders.... Not one power defender
194cm isn't big enough for you?
I think he means musle mass.
Ferg is very young.
It is no accident that FB' often hit there straps when they area bit older and muscled up.

There are exceptions like Max and Fletcher.

Ferg I have great hopus for..but at seasons start he was only 85kg. That may take at least another two pre-seasons to muscle up. He may well however be more suited to CHB than FB.
Agreed, more of a potential upgrade on Gilbert/Clarke/Blake/Simpkin. Who knows, in time may develop in to the long term Chips replacement.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226022Post Con Gorozidis »

i genuinely believe ferg will be the real deal.
have a look at his birth date. he is young and good!


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226051Post defacto »

i think we will draft a ready made backman and a ready made ruck.

i think we will make a play for silvagni from the dockers who has been ostracised by ross. i think we'll find the ruck from the vfl/sanfl/wafl like we did with milera/saad.


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226061Post Sobraz »

Silvani is ribbish... And is not a big bodied defender as its been established we're lacking... Simkpin is a far better prospect...

Simpkin was beaten on Friday night, but Jack's tally was a slightly fortuitous one with a few over the tops and off the pack goals.. Very well played by Jack, but just one of those nights for Tom...

A Frawley like back is what we need... If only he was Danny's son, not his nephew... In that, a handy father son pick up would come in handy at some stage to, but thats a whole new topic..


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226066Post gringo »

Silvagni looked ok to me. Jay Lever will be a KP in the future as he was more a KP played as a ruck where his stocks dropped. He is a long way off but is tall and rangy and could be a Dustin Fletcher type eventually.


defacto
Club Player
Posts: 1514
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2010 1:47pm

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226067Post defacto »

Sobraz wrote:Silvani is ribbish... And is not a big bodied defender as its been established we're lacking... Simkpin is a far better prospect...

Simpkin was beaten on Friday night, but Jack's tally was a slightly fortuitous one with a few over the tops and off the pack goals.. Very well played by Jack, but just one of those nights for Tom...

A Frawley like back is what we need... If only he was Danny's son, not his nephew... In that, a handy father son pick up would come in handy at some stage to, but thats a whole new topic..
really? says who? silvagni is 191cm and 90kg. glass the best FB in the league is 192 and 94kg.

silvagni has mostly played FB/CHB in the vfl before being drafted to freo


User avatar
bobmurray
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7854
Joined: Mon 03 Oct 2005 11:08pm
Location: In the stand at RSEA Park.
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226079Post bobmurray »

saintsRrising wrote:
groupie1 wrote:Simpkin is the new Max Hudghton... who ended up playing a career as full-back; with Penny, Shanahan, Dawson, even Gehrig in between. I know there is a size differential but Hudghton made a career of it.
.

Sorry but why?

Max had enormous closing speed, and could reel in forwards that had jumped away from him. Simpkin simply does not.

Max became one of the best spoilers ever....maybe Simpkin will, and maybe not...but he does not have Max's speed.

Simpkin is undersized to play FB. He does not have Max's spped...or Trevor Barkers magnifcent leap.... or Mal Michael enormous strength.

Simpkin is not the new "Max", but he can be the new "Blake" who takes the third tall, medium or occasional small.

Big forwards have been monstering us this season... Buddy, Cox, Riewoldt....

Even Anthony who has done nothing for years came on and kicked 2 goals against us.

Our other tall backs in Fisher and Gilbert are more interceptors than Full backs.

We need a genuine Full Back to complement them.
We do need a key back but not from the Under 18's, if the club wants to fix that weakness for next season...


The list changes for 2025 have begun, always an interesting time for an avid supporter.
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: We should make a play for a backman

Post: # 1226085Post sunsaint »

how quickly we forget
we had one, Mat Maguire
he could have played out his career (& earnt us a father/som)
while we developed a kid over the three years...
another player we burnt contract wise


Seeya
*************
Post Reply