It took two minutes to prove a point.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
It took two minutes to prove a point.
Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
CURLY wrote:Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Wish umpires werent blamed every game. Not a problem thus far. We just arent up to it.
Follow me for my expert opinions on Twitter @DanielClark93
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
There's your answer Curly. The director of umpires was watching a race.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
When you compare that non fifty to the one against Kosi and the one that Gaff got in the last couple of minutes when nobody went near him or went over the mark. It seemed a bit strange.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
kosifantutti wrote:There's your answer Curly. The director of umpires was watching a race.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
When you compare that non fifty to the one against Kosi and the one that Gaff got in the last couple of minutes when nobody went near him or went over the mark. It seemed a bit strange.
Maybe they want us to fail. It makes sense.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2622
- Joined: Thu 29 Sep 2011 9:45pm
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
The umpires are into the Eagles especially at home. Duck, Duck, Duck, Goose.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
It is bizarre as to how it happens but it is happening.
- The Fireman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13241
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:54pm
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 1907 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
goddard marks, arms chopped..no mark...was wearing the wrong jumper.
Multiple other decisions.
Multiple other decisions.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Got to 16 points the Eagles got the next 6 frees. Just have to laugh at the treatment of Riewoldt.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
It got to 16 points, but it was at 50.
You need to start well in away fixtures. If you don't everything needs to go your way. At Subie that's next to impossible for extended periods. Thats the simple fact of it. You give yourself a sniff, you're a chance. You don't and the ugly intangibles become a factor.
You need to start well in away fixtures. If you don't everything needs to go your way. At Subie that's next to impossible for extended periods. Thats the simple fact of it. You give yourself a sniff, you're a chance. You don't and the ugly intangibles become a factor.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Must say I called out when this happened at the start of the game. Mainly because of the Gee/Coll Game. Stopped Hayes from possibly wheeling around for a quick inside 50. Also was nowhere near being in the contest.
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
What Wilkes did to Nicnat for that last goal is exactly what Roo has put up with for years, it is very confusing to know the difference.CURLY wrote:Got to 16 points the Eagles got the next 6 frees. Just have to laugh at the treatment of Riewoldt.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
According to the afl live scoreboard, 5mins after the game ended the free kicks were 15 to 25.
Now it is saying 16 to 25. Are we getting free kicks after we've left the stadium? Those little eveneruppers are now happening after the game?
Now it is saying 16 to 25. Are we getting free kicks after we've left the stadium? Those little eveneruppers are now happening after the game?
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Umpiring was not up to scratch
Goddard chopped in the arms and pushed in the back - umps response "play on". In fact I felt they were making a point of not giving Goddard anything - is this a response to his acting last week. If so you'd be pretty disappointed.
Blake brought down after he kicked the ball going forward - "play on"
Lenny rarely gets any help from the umpires - again has his head taken off (week after week) with no assistance from the officials.
Perhaps the umps are overreacting to the head high criticism
It's easy to have a crack after you lose a game like that but I'd be surprised if a review of that game didn't reveal several inconsistencies and bad decisions.
Goddard chopped in the arms and pushed in the back - umps response "play on". In fact I felt they were making a point of not giving Goddard anything - is this a response to his acting last week. If so you'd be pretty disappointed.
Blake brought down after he kicked the ball going forward - "play on"
Lenny rarely gets any help from the umpires - again has his head taken off (week after week) with no assistance from the officials.
Perhaps the umps are overreacting to the head high criticism
It's easy to have a crack after you lose a game like that but I'd be surprised if a review of that game didn't reveal several inconsistencies and bad decisions.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Do you think they could actually get umpires who know how to bounce and throw the ball in!
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Was it seriously 8 goals from frees?
You know you're getting a rough deal when Dwayne is querying some of them![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
You know you're getting a rough deal when Dwayne is querying some of them
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
K serious?
8 goals????
That is ridiculous by any margin!!!!
How many did we get?
8 goals????
That is ridiculous by any margin!!!!
How many did we get?
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10120
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1299 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
How's when Milne was grabbed around the ankles no free of course and Dwayne says Milne clearly tripped and a free would have been paid if he fell over.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
[quote][/quote]Maybe they want us to fail. It makes sense.[quote]
Maybe they don't have bad days either. That seems about right.
Maybe they don't have bad days either. That seems about right.
I've never seen a bad St.Kilda player - that's just how they are.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
About as much sense as your theory that they make deliberate mistakes to make up for the mistakes they know they made earlier on.plugger66 wrote:kosifantutti wrote:There's your answer Curly. The director of umpires was watching a race.plugger66 wrote:
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
When you compare that non fifty to the one against Kosi and the one that Gaff got in the last couple of minutes when nobody went near him or went over the mark. It seemed a bit strange.
Maybe they want us to fail. It makes sense.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
can someone punch selwood out!
every time he gets the ball he ducks the head and runs at the player in front of him head first.
cheat.
every time he gets the ball he ducks the head and runs at the player in front of him head first.
cheat.
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
kosifantutti wrote:plugger66 wrote:About as much sense as your theory that they make deliberate mistakes to make up for the mistakes they know they made earlier on.kosifantutti wrote:
Maybe they want us to fail. It makes sense.
Not sure I have ever said that but carry on.
- ShanghaiSaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
and the Goddard high/arm chop, funny how cox was paid it 2 minutes later.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Two minutes in Hayes takes a mark fifty five out Selwood comes in and retards him. Umpire gives nothing. Well Plugger66 why?
Dont know. was watching a race. Anyway the umpiring has been good apart from maybe that decision.
Fortius Quo Fidelius
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8581
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 526 times
- Been thanked: 1527 times
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
I'm not sure if you said that either. Who knows what you were trying to say. But it made no sense.plugger66 wrote:kosifantutti wrote:]About as much sense as your theory that they make deliberate mistakes to make up for the mistakes they know they made earlier on.
Not sure I have ever said that but carry on.
plugger66 wrote:The Stanley mark was the incorrect and correct decision. He paid a mark that wasnt held which was the incorrect part but then correctly called play on because he was incorrect in the first instance and that is what you have to do as an umpire.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
kosifantutti wrote:I'm not sure if you said that either. Who knows what you were trying to say. But it made no sense.plugger66 wrote:kosifantutti wrote:]About as much sense as your theory that they make deliberate mistakes to make up for the mistakes they know they made earlier on.
Not sure I have ever said that but carry on.
plugger66 wrote:The Stanley mark was the incorrect and correct decision. He paid a mark that wasnt held which was the incorrect part but then correctly called play on because he was incorrect in the first instance and that is what you have to do as an umpire.
That is the rule if you pay a mark that should not have been paid. It isnt a mistake. Dont like it. Take it up with the AFL.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Re: It took two minutes to prove a point.
Makes sense.plugger66 wrote:
That is the rule if you pay a mark that should not have been paid. It isnt a mistake.
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post