Go figure
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Nevertheless, two goals with his first two kick at his new club was a fine start to his Sainthood.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
rubbish post...Wilkes should never have been subbed,,,ask WattersSainterK wrote:Rubbish.stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Was the perfect move in the context of the match.
Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.
Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.
It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?
Exactly. Any reasonable person who understands the game would know that. Just dont ask Gramps (Joffa)bobmurray wrote:rubbish post...Wilkes should never have been subbed,,,ask WattersSainterK wrote:Rubbish.stkildathunda wrote:Watters subbbed him so its easier to drop him next week so he can get Kosi back in side.. Cant drop bloke if he kicks 5 or more goals!!
Was the perfect move in the context of the match.
Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.
Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.
It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?
I wouldn't ask that idiot anything.....clarky449 wrote:Exactly. Any reasonable person who understands the game would know that. Just dont ask Gramps (Joffa)bobmurray wrote:rubbish post...Wilkes should never have been subbed,,,ask WattersSainterK wrote: Rubbish.
Was the perfect move in the context of the match.
Should be happy we have a coach who can make moves according to the tone of where things are at, it was the game sealer for mine.
Polo was PERFECT for that last quarter, just perfect.
It was never going to be about leading forwards, it was going to be about in close contested footy, surely you get that?
the reality is they took off the wrong one..he was the best tall on the night...if you read the after match comment from Watters you'll knowSainterK wrote:I was rubbishing the vibe of stkildathundas post that implied Watters did it on purpose so he can get Kosi back in the side.
I still think the move to take off a tall was the right one, as it was the wrong move to go in with so many.
Who do you think he should of subbed off?bobmurray wrote:the reality is they took off the wrong one..he was the best tall on the night...if you read the after match comment from Watters you'll knowSainterK wrote:I was rubbishing the vibe of stkildathundas post that implied Watters did it on purpose so he can get Kosi back in the side.
I still think the move to take off a tall was the right one, as it was the wrong move to go in with so many.
he tried to reverse the decision to sub Wilkes.......
Bloody hell do you seriously think i was serious with that post? Clearly i forgot the :sarcasm: image for that one... If any tall was subbed it should have been Gilbert or Riewoldt.SainterK wrote:I was rubbishing the vibe of stkildathundas post that implied Watters did it on purpose so he can get Kosi back in the side.
I still think the move to take off a tall was the right one, as it was the wrong move to go in with so many.
SainterK wrote:Who do you think he should of subbed off?bobmurray wrote:the reality is they took off the wrong one..he was the best tall on the night...if you read the after match comment from Watters you'll knowSainterK wrote:I was rubbishing the vibe of stkildathundas post that implied Watters did it on purpose so he can get Kosi back in the side.
I still think the move to take off a tall was the right one, as it was the wrong move to go in with so many.
he tried to reverse the decision to sub Wilkes.......
He had 4 touches, 3 goals, up until that point of deciding to sub him off.
"We made the decision to get him off [because] we thought we needed to go a little bit smaller," Watters said.
I reckon this instinct was the correct one, Wilkes or otherwise.
Watters has since fessed that they tried to reverse the decision to sub Wilkes..there is no defense for it...they f**ked up...
Why sub off someone who is getting the ball to leave on those who can't get near it....ludicrous......
Stanley was helping in the ruck, so Roo?
Roo? Yes. He'd had a stinker of a night, being too slow to get rid of the ball most times he did get his hands on it, fumbling it on others and didn't look like taking an overhead mark. Gilbert had also had either one or two possessions to that point (two to 3/4 time, reportedly). Goddard was also having a stinker and his kicking was dreadful.SainterK wrote:Who do you think he should of subbed off?bobmurray wrote:the reality is they took off the wrong one..he was the best tall on the night...if you read the after match comment from Watters you'll knowSainterK wrote:I was rubbishing the vibe of stkildathundas post that implied Watters did it on purpose so he can get Kosi back in the side.
I still think the move to take off a tall was the right one, as it was the wrong move to go in with so many.
he tried to reverse the decision to sub Wilkes.......
He had 4 touches, 3 goals, up until that point of deciding to sub him off.
"We made the decision to get him off [because] we thought we needed to go a little bit smaller," Watters said.
I reckon this instinct was the correct one, Wilkes or otherwise.
Stanley was helping in the ruck, so Roo?
Utter rubbish.paddy wrote:Kosi may struggle for selection after a good game by Wilkes!
I think kosi is a champ, but being a good bloke shouldn't get u automatically selected.
BOG??? He had 5 possessions FFS, Kosi does this and everyone on here is calling for him to be dropped or traded or shot. Anyway I heard that Wilkes cured cancer, rid the world of poverty and brought peace to the middle east before he was subbed offfugazi wrote:Wilkes BOG and subbed off!!!!
It's going to be interesting all right.... stats are about the same....paddy wrote:Kosi may struggle for selection after a good game by Wilkes!
I think kosi is a champ, but being a good bloke shouldn't get u automatically selected.