Trade rumours - post them here

st_Trav_ofWA · Thu 13 Oct 2011 1:39am

I think the key here is the part where it's says "Tommy preference would be to stay with the saints " ..... It's trade week of course his manager would befielding calls ... We wont trade him and once all the to and fro from this week is done he will get a contract

defacto · Post: # 1160822Post **defacto** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 1:46am

sainterinsydney wrote:If Tommy Walsh is poached, St Kilda may as well just fold. I'm serious about this. If we let this guy get picked up by another club, after putting all that work into him, we are a disgrace.

this. i will not renew my membership.

st_Trav_ofWA · Thu 13 Oct 2011 1:55am

defacto wrote:
sainterinsydney wrote:If Tommy Walsh is poached, St Kilda may as well just fold. I'm serious about this. If we let this guy get picked up by another club, after putting all that work into him, we are a disgrace.
this. i will not renew my membership.

What a stupid comment .... How on earth did we cope with Plugger leaving for the swans ?? You wont renew if we Tommy walks ... Get real !!!

St Ick · Post: # 1160850Post **St Ick** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 8:50am

This is just my idea and not a rumour or anything, but why aren't clubs making a play for Majak Daw? North have Goldstein, McIntosh, Petrie and Daw (who its been said does his best albeit inconsistent work in the ruck).

With the sub rule, they cant play all 4, why hasn't Daw's name been brought up? If our Tommy Walsh can be inquired about without a game to his name, why wouldn't we try to find our ruck that we need over at North?

noob · Post: # 1160873Post **noob** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 9:24am

Daw might possibly have another year on his contract?

St Ick · Post: # 1160897Post **St Ick** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 9:58am

noob wrote:Daw might possibly have another year on his contract?

You mean a contract like Gram, Lyon, Lynch and Goddard?

SainterK · Post: # 1161332Post **SainterK** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 4:27pm

barrettdamian Damian Barrett
Farren Ray's manager @mpask says no contract has been offered by the Saints

Dr Spaceman · Thu 13 Oct 2011 4:30pm

A tweet from a Saintsational favourite

@barrettdamien

"Farren Ray's manager @mpask says no contract has been offered by the Saints"

SainterK · Post: # 1161338Post **SainterK** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 4:33pm

Pask also says we have 14 uncontracted players.

Raph, Farren, Zac, Dawson, Gamble, Lynch.

Who else ?

lefty · Post: # 1161357Post **lefty** » Thu 13 Oct 2011 5:07pm

SainterK wrote:Pask also says we have 14 uncontracted players.

Raph, Farren, Zac, Dawson, Gamble, Lynch.

Who else ?

Dempster, what about Blake? Peake?

Imo, #1 player to re-sign atm is Dempster followed by Peake.

saintnick12 · Thu 13 Oct 2011 6:44pm

lefty wrote:
SainterK wrote:Pask also says we have 14 uncontracted players.

Raph, Farren, Zac, Dawson, Gamble, Lynch.

Who else ?
Dempster, what about Blake? Peake?

Imo, #1 player to re-sign atm is Dempster followed by Peake.

Lynch is contracted for next year...confirmed by List manager (Bains??) on SEN tonight.

I would think you could also add Walsh, Polo, as well

then you would think a few of the others that aren't regular senior players
Archer? Johnson?

3rd generation saint · Sun 16 Oct 2011 6:48pm

With all the good news regarding our coach, did any trades actually take place today other than Mitch Clarke?
Plus any rumours or hints of possible trades done by us by 2.00pm tomorrow?

sainterinsydney · Sun 16 Oct 2011 7:08pm

Shitney supporters on BF are so cocky about this. Can't wait till next year when we play them and Tommy tears them apart! (I'm confident he won't be going anywhere.)

ace · Post: # 1163939Post **ace** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 7:13pm

No-one wants Gram - he is known to be a lightweight.

Eastern · Post: # 1163944Post **Eastern** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 7:16pm

If we are to get Salary Cap releif we will probably ONLY trade (our) players for (their) picks. The only other option would be to de-list players AFTER 2.00pm tomorrow

How tight the cap is how much relief want/need would only be "accurately" known by a chosen few.

Tomorrow could be an interesting day !!

Teflon · Post: # 1164059Post **Teflon** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 9:23pm

sainterinsydney wrote:Shitney supporters on BF are so cocky about this. Can't wait till next year when we play them and Tommy tears them apart! (I'm confident he won't be going anywhere.)

hope thats based on something other than gut feel...

Hurricane · Sun 16 Oct 2011 10:33pm

ace wrote:No-one wants Gram - he is known to be a lightweight.

North made offers. Carlton made inquiries. He is a wanted player on our list. Blues and Roos both want and need a running defender, which Gram should be not a midfielder.

BANG BANG

LTN16 · Post: # 1164096Post **LTN16** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 10:44pm

St Ick wrote:This is just my idea and not a rumour or anything, but why aren't clubs making a play for Majak Daw? North have Goldstein, McIntosh, Petrie and Daw (who its been said does his best albeit inconsistent work in the ruck).

With the sub rule, they cant play all 4, why hasn't Daw's name been brought up? If our Tommy Walsh can be inquired about without a game to his name, why wouldn't we try to find our ruck that we need over at North?

Because Majak Daw just signed for another 2 year contract with the roos

dragit · Post: # 1164097Post **dragit** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 10:45pm

Hurricane wrote:
ace wrote:No-one wants Gram - he is known to be a lightweight.
North made offers. Carlton made inquiries. He is a wanted player on our list. Blues and Roos both want and need a running defender, which Gram should be not a midfielder.

BANG BANG

He will go to one of those,
My new rumour is Peake to Essendon for a pick.

Old Mate · Post: # 1164100Post **Old Mate** » Sun 16 Oct 2011 10:48pm

dragit wrote:
Hurricane wrote:
ace wrote:No-one wants Gram - he is known to be a lightweight.
North made offers. Carlton made inquiries. He is a wanted player on our list. Blues and Roos both want and need a running defender, which Gram should be not a midfielder.

BANG BANG
He will go to one of those,
My new rumour is Peake to Essendon for a pick.

Where'd you hear the Peake rumour?

dragit · Post: # 1164257Post **dragit** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 9:05am

Old Mate wrote:
dragit wrote:
Hurricane wrote:
ace wrote:No-one wants Gram - he is known to be a lightweight.
North made offers. Carlton made inquiries. He is a wanted player on our list. Blues and Roos both want and need a running defender, which Gram should be not a midfielder.

BANG BANG
He will go to one of those,
My new rumour is Peake to Essendon for a pick.
Where'd you hear the Peake rumour?

Don't worry, thin air, no substance at all, I heard Thompson saying that they were trying to get a few trades done, thought they might look at Peake?

I think we will lose more players for cap room today, & most probably those on the wrong side of 25.

SainterK · Post: # 1164410Post **SainterK** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 12:02pm

Pask just wandered into the players area, thinking it may be to sign up Dawson, Ray and Gram with the club?

matrix · Post: # 1164417Post **matrix** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 12:04pm

dawson and ray
not gram

hmmmmmm

dragit · Post: # 1164422Post **dragit** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 12:06pm

Gram is contracted so they don't need to announce anythingâ€¦

Unless Tom Lynch was on mega-bucks, we still need to shift a senior player to get under the cap next year?

noob · Post: # 1164423Post **noob** » Mon 17 Oct 2011 12:08pm

By what the coach is saying we will probably won't be in any more trades