Well you were responding to your own post in a sort of "I told you so manner".Con Gorozidis wrote:hardly pompous when i said i could not have done any better. just saying i was concerned this would be the fall out and noone is to blame.Dr Spaceman wrote:Maybe it's something to do with the pompousness of your post ConCon Gorozidis wrote:what are you weirdos talking about.saint66au wrote:Some people can sniff out a reason to bash the Club at 100 pacesDr Spaceman wrote:Where's the proof they've mishandled this Con?Con Gorozidis wrote:as expected saints managed to mis-handle this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:I just hope that if harves doesn't get the job it is handled well and there is no fall out with the club or any bad vibes.
I know it sounds unlikely but this is the saints remember.
Yes it appears he hasn't got the job. And it appears he's upset he didn't get the job.
Everything else is conjecture.
you seem to not be able to distinguish between the "decision process" and the "legend mgt issue".
I am also not bashing at all. I just said I feared this may not end well - which was totally spot on.
FFS.
I am not saying we mishandled the decision process ( i have made numerous posts saying how impressed i was with the the panel etc etc).
I am saying there was always a danger there would be a bruised ego and an upset legend at the end of it.
I have no idea how it could have been avoided - (but i have low emotional intelligence and im not a psychologist or a buddhist monk). all i did was point out that this situation may transpire for a less than optimum result/outcome.
if people cant understand that aspect then thats their problem not mine.![]()
Con Gorozidis wrote:as expected saints managed to mis-handle this one.
egos as we all know are delicate little petals and noses and knickers can easilt be caught in knots.
Could have been seen as a little bit pompous, petal
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)