down to two
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- MC Gusto
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6083
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
were you born a c*** or just became one as your life dragged on and st kilda wore away at you?plugger66 wrote:Watters and Richardson. Anyone could work that out. Is this the same source as you had when RL signed for 4 years. Lets face it, its a guess and a pretty good one.
my source is good brother man. The board was shocked with rosscoe's decision...you cannot ping that one on me. nobody knew including his management!
there are very clear differences between this process and that defection
#1 Ryder fan
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
- SunburySaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 405
- Joined: Wed 22 Jun 2011 2:47pm
My guess is if your source is that good then you shouldnt be posting it on here. My guess is he wouldnt want that. On the other hand if it is a guess as the RL one turned out to be then by all means go for it. And thanks for the compliment. Means a lot coming from you.MC Gusto wrote:were you born a c*** or just became one as your life dragged on and st kilda wore away at you?plugger66 wrote:Watters and Richardson. Anyone could work that out. Is this the same source as you had when RL signed for 4 years. Lets face it, its a guess and a pretty good one.
my source is good brother man. The board was shocked with rosscoe's decision...you cannot ping that one on me. nobody knew including his management!
there are very clear differences between this process and that defection
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Try this on.
The Board was shocked by the Lyon defection and were totally blind sided.
The players (or a few of the senior players anyway) are of the view that the Board could have acted more quickly and are disappointed that they did not and at the outcome because they rated Lyon - but they also hasten to add that they are understanding of the Board and its position.
They speak of the situation in a very disciplined and very considered manner - and whilst disappointed they await the naming of the replacement coach and they have trust in the process being followed.
Fact.
The Board was shocked by the Lyon defection and were totally blind sided.
The players (or a few of the senior players anyway) are of the view that the Board could have acted more quickly and are disappointed that they did not and at the outcome because they rated Lyon - but they also hasten to add that they are understanding of the Board and its position.
They speak of the situation in a very disciplined and very considered manner - and whilst disappointed they await the naming of the replacement coach and they have trust in the process being followed.
Fact.
.plugger66 wrote:My guess is if your source is that good then you shouldnt be posting it on here. My guess is he wouldnt want that. On the other hand if it is a guess as the RL one turned out to be then by all means go for it. And thanks for the compliment. Means a lot coming from you.MC Gusto wrote:were you born a c*** or just became one as your life dragged on and st kilda wore away at you?plugger66 wrote:Watters and Richardson. Anyone could work that out. Is this the same source as you had when RL signed for 4 years. Lets face it, its a guess and a pretty good one.
my source is good brother man. The board was shocked with rosscoe's decision...you cannot ping that one on me. nobody knew including his management!
there are very clear differences between this process and that defection
Plugger If you had actually bothered to read the media the club was indeed giving Lyon a new 4 year deal and was under the assumption that he was staying.. Both MC and myself had this info his source different to mine. Club was very surprised of what happened with Lyon.
Board and those associated believed it a done deal.
Doesn't mean MC is wrong about this!
Thats Mr. Smartarse to you