thejiggingsaint wrote:John, I'm not suckered into thinking we have a "culture problem" at the club, just dismayed that the publicity that this incident gathered did damage to the club. Now that incident has gone and is history, however, to go on the FS and reopen it is DUMB!
The club's been 'damaged' because we lost.
The same as every club that loses, gets these types of 'issues' dragged up. Collingwood will now start to come under scrutiny, for behaviour far worse than ours. But until last week, no one cared and it wasn't considered relevant because they won the flag.
That's what I'm saying. This stuff is not important. Every club does it, almost all far worse than us.
The only reason anyone takes it remotely seriously or even talks about it is because we lost. Had we won in 09, it would have never made the papers and most likely some journos might have chosen to actually do some research in the first place.
Pretty much, I don't think it matters what our players or the club do. Off-field, we're far better than just about anyone else and yet we still get headlines for the most menial things.
I don't blame the players. I don't blame the club. I blame the people that allow these 'stories' to sell papers - the public.
I personally, could not care less. I'd much rather my club make headlines and supposedly be 'damaged' for irrelevant stuff than not make headlines for serious things like assaulting women, assaulting innocent cabbies, gambling the footy, being involved in illegal drugs, and so on and so on.
I care about what I think it relevant - not what some fuckwith at the chicken shop thinks is a big deal simply because it's on the front page of the Herald-Sun website!
In summary, the club isn't damaged to me. We're getting a new coach, have a shiny new home, are getting millions from the AFL and a guarantee we'll exist for another 10 years or whatever.
So the Herald-Sun and Neil Mitchell can say what they like, but for mine the 'issues' at my club aren't issues at all.