Team v Swans
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
we were poisoned a couple of weeks, ago, this week, we'll break sydney's heart in the wall of Ross.
Rooey to bounce back with 4 goals, 2 goal assists
Kosi to kick 3.3 missing one right on 25 metres but kicking one boomer to finish off the swans in the 15 minute of the 4 quarter to have us 6 goals up.
Rooey to bounce back with 4 goals, 2 goal assists
Kosi to kick 3.3 missing one right on 25 metres but kicking one boomer to finish off the swans in the 15 minute of the 4 quarter to have us 6 goals up.
Bewaire krime, da krimson bolt is comeing to yure nayborhood to smach krime
SHUT UP KRIME!
SHUT UP KRIME!
Doesn't the sub usually come from the four named on the bench?plugger66 wrote:I would think Geary will be sub.
Armo, Steven, Ray, Polo.
I would be voting on Farren again.
"I'm in the middle of a long conversation with my audience. It'll be a lifelong journey for both of us by the time we're done." - Bruce Springsteen.
- dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
It doesn't have too, but I can't remember the Sub coming from anyone not named on the bench? Has it?plugger66 wrote:No it has nothing to do with the named bench.Badlands wrote:Doesn't the sub usually come from the four named on the bench?plugger66 wrote:I would think Geary will be sub.
Armo, Steven, Ray, Polo.
I would be voting on Farren again.
I wouldnt have a clue but I would think it has.dragit wrote:It doesn't have too, but I can't remember the Sub coming from anyone not named on the bench? Has it?plugger66 wrote:No it has nothing to do with the named bench.Badlands wrote:Doesn't the sub usually come from the four named on the bench?plugger66 wrote:I would think Geary will be sub.
Armo, Steven, Ray, Polo.
I would be voting on Farren again.
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Still think we Gardiner !
Still think we Gardiner !
Perhaps there will a late change Gardiner for McEvoy?
Perhaps there will a late change Gardiner for McEvoy?
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Re: Still think we Gardiner !
Why not just name them though?WinnersOnly wrote:Still think we Gardiner !
Perhaps there will a late change Gardiner for McEvoy?
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
McEvoy will definately play IMO, If Gardiner is a late change it would be for Kosi Blake or Dawson and i cant see any of them making way! Gardiner played OK last week but our balance and attack improved dramatically after the sub was made, McEvoy is now number 1 ruck without hesitation IMO!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
Maybe this year?
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10426
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
It isnt going to be a mid however inexperienced they are so it will not be Steven. It has to be either Geary, Blake or Ray. They are the only 3 options.rexy wrote:McEvoy will definately play IMO, If Gardiner is a late change it would be for Kosi Blake or Dawson and i cant see any of them making way! Gardiner played OK last week but our balance and attack improved dramatically after the sub was made, McEvoy is now number 1 ruck without hesitation IMO!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
Love the way so many on the forum speak as if they know, as if it is a fore gone conclusion and there is no chance they could be wrong! For what its worth you could be right, your logic seems solid and I agree that Jack is a pure mid and the others mentioned are not, we also go in with midfielder more than we had last week with the inclusion of Armo, time will tell!plugger66 wrote:It isnt going to be a mid however inexperienced they are so it will not be Steven. It has to be either Geary, Blake or Ray. They are the only 3 options.rexy wrote:McEvoy will definately play IMO, If Gardiner is a late change it would be for Kosi Blake or Dawson and i cant see any of them making way! Gardiner played OK last week but our balance and attack improved dramatically after the sub was made, McEvoy is now number 1 ruck without hesitation IMO!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
For the record I would not play Jack as the sub I just think that Ross may!
Maybe this year?
Sorry next time I will say IMO. Jack is far to good of a player to be sub. Unless there is an obvious sun lets just pick our 22 player IMO. Jack is about 8th.rexy wrote:Love the way so many on the forum speak as if they know, as if it is a fore gone conclusion and there is no chance they could be wrong! For what its worth you could be right, your logic seems solid and I agree that Jack is a pure mid and the others mentioned are not, we also go in with midfielder more than we had last week with the inclusion of Armo, time will tell!plugger66 wrote:It isnt going to be a mid however inexperienced they are so it will not be Steven. It has to be either Geary, Blake or Ray. They are the only 3 options.rexy wrote:McEvoy will definately play IMO, If Gardiner is a late change it would be for Kosi Blake or Dawson and i cant see any of them making way! Gardiner played OK last week but our balance and attack improved dramatically after the sub was made, McEvoy is now number 1 ruck without hesitation IMO!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
For the record I would not play Jack as the sub I just think that Ross may!
Agreed, very important player and has to much quality to be the sub!plugger66 wrote:Sorry next time I will say IMO. Jack is far to good of a player to be sub. Unless there is an obvious sun lets just pick our 22 player IMO. Jack is about 8th.rexy wrote:Love the way so many on the forum speak as if they know, as if it is a fore gone conclusion and there is no chance they could be wrong! For what its worth you could be right, your logic seems solid and I agree that Jack is a pure mid and the others mentioned are not, we also go in with midfielder more than we had last week with the inclusion of Armo, time will tell!plugger66 wrote:It isnt going to be a mid however inexperienced they are so it will not be Steven. It has to be either Geary, Blake or Ray. They are the only 3 options.rexy wrote:McEvoy will definately play IMO, If Gardiner is a late change it would be for Kosi Blake or Dawson and i cant see any of them making way! Gardiner played OK last week but our balance and attack improved dramatically after the sub was made, McEvoy is now number 1 ruck without hesitation IMO!
I like the idea of Gram as sub but dont think Ross will go with that, IMO it will be Steven, he is the least finals experienced and I see Ross as a fairly safe kind of a guy, this would be the safe option!
Good to see Baker still an emergency, with Sandy not playing finals can anyone shed any light on how we would be keeping the likes of the 3 emergencies along with Lynch Walsh Cripps Syposs(spelling?) Mini Eddy etc in some kind of match fitnesss in case of injuries?
Think Reiwoldt will have a big game by the way!
For the record I would not play Jack as the sub I just think that Ross may!
Maybe this year?
- Winmarvellous
- Club Player
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Mon 25 Sep 2006 8:13pm
- Location: WA
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
The Fireman wrote:Right here.Spinner wrote:Where are all the Gardiner haters now???????????
Woops. I mean Gardiner lovers.
BTW the source is Patrick Keane from the AFL Communications. Really pisses me off how others re-use that information without detailing where it has come from.
Thank you for identifying yourself.
- Spinner
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8502
- Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
- Location: Victoria
- Has thanked: 185 times
- Been thanked: 133 times
Winmarvellous wrote:Honestly, I see Gardi coming in. Mumford KILLED us last time, and I think come Saturday Gardiner will find himself in a Saints guernsey. Who for I don't know. The Swans have gone tall too...
So the solution to a dominate ruckman is to just to just play more ruckmen.
Memo Geelong to combat Buddy. Play 22 backmen.
Have to agree with spinner (not there is anything wrong with that), winning a game of football is not about having to win every position or match the oppositions strengths. It is about setting your self aside from your opposition, taking a leadership position. Best case scenario for us is that all the talkback on saturday nights drive home is about how the swans were too tall, and whilst even though Mumford was very good, when the ball hit the ground the saints were to good for them.Spinner wrote:Winmarvellous wrote:Honestly, I see Gardi coming in. Mumford KILLED us last time, and I think come Saturday Gardiner will find himself in a Saints guernsey. Who for I don't know. The Swans have gone tall too...
So the solution to a dominate ruckman is to just to just play more ruckmen.
Memo Geelong to combat Buddy. Play 22 backmen.
Must win on our terms!
Maybe this year?