Have Geelong finally killed off Luke Ball's AFL career?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
Have Geelong finally killed off Luke Ball's AFL career?
From some mates who are close to the action at Geelong (and were highly impressed by Cahill down there last week - and conveyed St Kilda's thoughts on both Cahill and Smith as not being far away at all), they now present that, having killed off Ball's career at St Kilda, they have now again showcased Ball's deficiencies and limitations putting very serious questions over his AFL future.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Sun 26 Aug 2007 1:16pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue 21 Dec 2010 3:04pm
Thought he played reasonably well with his deficiencies.
With so many forward runners, his spread is not needed as much. He can instead drop back as an extra man, in case of turnovers.
Now, the problem there is that when he does Mark or get a free, he is still a pretty shocking kick.
Certainly won't be dropped this year, but as Blair continues to develop, I'm not sure where he will stand.
With so many forward runners, his spread is not needed as much. He can instead drop back as an extra man, in case of turnovers.
Now, the problem there is that when he does Mark or get a free, he is still a pretty shocking kick.
Certainly won't be dropped this year, but as Blair continues to develop, I'm not sure where he will stand.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19106
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2019 times
Re: Have Geelong finally killed off Luke Ball's AFL career?
What crap. LB has had his best year since 2006. Most of the filth were no good last night. That's what happens when you get ramed by nearly 100 points.To the top wrote:From some mates who are close to the action at Geelong (and were highly impressed by Cahill down there last week - and conveyed St Kilda's thoughts on both Cahill and Smith as not being far away at all), they now present that, having killed off Ball's career at St Kilda, they have now again showcased Ball's deficiencies and limitations putting very serious questions over his AFL future.
As for Cahill, I saw him in the SC last week and he is a stick. Not sure he would have the strength to be successful in the AFL.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10429
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 713 times
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 564 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Yep any reason to slam Ball. They must watch his output weekly, and hope for an ordinary performance so they can start a threadplugger66 wrote:Could be the craziest thread we have ever had and that is saying something. Loopy. Cahill is good after one good game and Ball is finished after one poor one. Yep that would good if you judged footy like that. Loopier.
No Contract, No contact
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4941
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 491 times
I was at the game - Geelong v pies and thought that Ball was their best player. Only one who kept tryingMCG-Unit wrote:Yep any reason to slam Ball. They must watch his output weekly, and hope for an ordinary performance so they can start a threadplugger66 wrote:Could be the craziest thread we have ever had and that is saying something. Loopy. Cahill is good after one good game and Ball is finished after one poor one. Yep that would good if you judged footy like that. Loopier.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11351
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1344 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 564 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Yes I heard he was ok - still that doesn't matter, some folks need to say he's no good, so they can feel better about themselvesMoods wrote:I was at the game - Geelong v pies and thought that Ball was their best player. Only one who kept tryingMCG-Unit wrote:Yep any reason to slam Ball. They must watch his output weekly, and hope for an ordinary performance so they can start a threadplugger66 wrote:Could be the craziest thread we have ever had and that is saying something. Loopy. Cahill is good after one good game and Ball is finished after one poor one. Yep that would good if you judged footy like that. Loopier.
Edit, should be Opp Bored.
No Contract, No contact