Did we purposely loose this game

plugger66 · Post: # 1124103Post **plugger66** » Mon 22 Aug 2011 9:12am

One of the great threads. Yep it makes sense to deliberately lose and then have to play a side that won by 100 points a week earlier.

Thinline · Post: # 1124107Post **Thinline** » Mon 22 Aug 2011 9:34am

LOOSE: not firmly attached.

LOSE: to be defeated.

Now go away and practice and at least you'll gain something from this thread.

Dr Spaceman · Mon 22 Aug 2011 9:37am

Thinline wrote:LOOSE: not firmly attached.

LOSE: to be defeated.

Now go away and practice and at least you'll gain something from this thread.

Well we were a bit loose at times.

Was it deliberate?

thejiggingsaint · Mon 22 Aug 2011 9:53am

and after watching the game while consuming a takeaway vindaloo I became a bit "loose"

"deliberate"? nah! force of nature!

thejiggingsaint · Mon 22 Aug 2011 9:58am

It could be that Zac & Kosi were a wee bit "loose" pre-game

stevie · Post: # 1124115Post **stevie** » Mon 22 Aug 2011 10:04am

How did the subject get to Duthie?

Johnny Member · Mon 22 Aug 2011 10:05am

I think we're gone.

North are in good form, obviously. And Carlton are a really good team.

I'll be very surprised if we make it.

matrix · Post: # 1124130Post **matrix** » Mon 22 Aug 2011 10:25am

i reckon koz and zac mighta been a bit loose last night

SainterK · Post: # 1124141Post **SainterK** » Mon 22 Aug 2011 10:40am

I could be wrong, but if we lose the next two, but Richmond beat North Rd 24....is that is the only other way Saints make it in?