Pre- season --- all going to plan!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Pre- season --- all going to plan!
As an eternal optomist I am taking a very different view of this year's 'home and away' series.
My thinking goes like this.
Each year when it comes to finals, coaches and commentators regularly remind us that it is a whole new ball game. The season is consigned to history. The only influence is a) getting to the finals and b) determining who you play in the first week and what pathway you have to the GF
The home and away games are effectively the pre-season lead up to the finals.
The usual strategy is to try and win every game in the H&A to get to the highest position on the ladder. To do this most teams bust their guts early in the season, running out of steam as the season progresses and, more importantly showing their hand (in terms of game plans and strategy).
Cadel Evans' performance in the Tour de France is a timely reminder that in an endurance event it is not about bursting out early and getting ahead of the pack but staying with the peleton and using the power when it can be most effective. The only stage that he won was about the second last - the one that sent the killer blow.
So, where does this leave us? Has Rossy developed a killer strategy?
The game against West Coast showed that we have several strings to our bow. We can come out and play attacking footy, getting a score on the board. We can also lock the game down and maybe while not scoring (!) keep a lid on the opposition. And then do what has to be done to clinch the victory.
As one of the commentators said against Gold Coast, St Kilda was playing the sort of footy that you need to play in finals. Not pretty or flamboyant scoring but solid and controlled. Have we quietly slipped into that mode of play when it counts for most?
If we keep travelling as we are at the moment we should finish in the lower part of the 8. Historically that is not promising. I think that something like 22 of the last 24 preliminary finalists have come from the top 4. However, this is where teams have busted their gut for the whole season to sneak into the 8 and don't have much of a show at getting much further.
I reckon that if my strategy is real, then we are coming into the finals on a roll and prepared for the greater intensity of the finals. Also, I think that there is a slight advantage in launching from the lower part of the 8. It is likely that if in the top 4, we would end up playing against Geelong and Collingwood, and play one of them twice - a tough few weeks.
If things go to [my] plan - the first week we play a team that is (hopefully) lucky to still be in the 8, win that and then play the loser to either Collingwood or Geelong (and hopefully bruised by the encounter), we then have either pies or cats in a prelim and then the other in the GF - all very simple!! But, I reckon it is still an easier path than from the top 4.
The other advantage is that we have not really exposed the game plan options as we would if going flat out all year. On this basis, I am happy for next weeks game against Collingwood to be treated as a practice match where we can throw a few different things around. The result itself is not important - more imprtant to see how they respond (lets play with their minds!!).
OK, maybe I'm deluded but I like to think that Ross has come up with a fiendish strategy. I hope that I am right!
Enjoy the rest of the pre-season and bring on the real contest!
GO SAINTS!
My thinking goes like this.
Each year when it comes to finals, coaches and commentators regularly remind us that it is a whole new ball game. The season is consigned to history. The only influence is a) getting to the finals and b) determining who you play in the first week and what pathway you have to the GF
The home and away games are effectively the pre-season lead up to the finals.
The usual strategy is to try and win every game in the H&A to get to the highest position on the ladder. To do this most teams bust their guts early in the season, running out of steam as the season progresses and, more importantly showing their hand (in terms of game plans and strategy).
Cadel Evans' performance in the Tour de France is a timely reminder that in an endurance event it is not about bursting out early and getting ahead of the pack but staying with the peleton and using the power when it can be most effective. The only stage that he won was about the second last - the one that sent the killer blow.
So, where does this leave us? Has Rossy developed a killer strategy?
The game against West Coast showed that we have several strings to our bow. We can come out and play attacking footy, getting a score on the board. We can also lock the game down and maybe while not scoring (!) keep a lid on the opposition. And then do what has to be done to clinch the victory.
As one of the commentators said against Gold Coast, St Kilda was playing the sort of footy that you need to play in finals. Not pretty or flamboyant scoring but solid and controlled. Have we quietly slipped into that mode of play when it counts for most?
If we keep travelling as we are at the moment we should finish in the lower part of the 8. Historically that is not promising. I think that something like 22 of the last 24 preliminary finalists have come from the top 4. However, this is where teams have busted their gut for the whole season to sneak into the 8 and don't have much of a show at getting much further.
I reckon that if my strategy is real, then we are coming into the finals on a roll and prepared for the greater intensity of the finals. Also, I think that there is a slight advantage in launching from the lower part of the 8. It is likely that if in the top 4, we would end up playing against Geelong and Collingwood, and play one of them twice - a tough few weeks.
If things go to [my] plan - the first week we play a team that is (hopefully) lucky to still be in the 8, win that and then play the loser to either Collingwood or Geelong (and hopefully bruised by the encounter), we then have either pies or cats in a prelim and then the other in the GF - all very simple!! But, I reckon it is still an easier path than from the top 4.
The other advantage is that we have not really exposed the game plan options as we would if going flat out all year. On this basis, I am happy for next weeks game against Collingwood to be treated as a practice match where we can throw a few different things around. The result itself is not important - more imprtant to see how they respond (lets play with their minds!!).
OK, maybe I'm deluded but I like to think that Ross has come up with a fiendish strategy. I hope that I am right!
Enjoy the rest of the pre-season and bring on the real contest!
GO SAINTS!
St Carl
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
It would be nice to think that our situation has been so well planned by the maestro, Ross, but that's not reality.
The next 4 games will tell us where we are really at - Freo, Pies, Swans, North. The Swans will be our "absolute must win" match for 6th place.
Our best scenario is to finish 6th, which means a game against 3rd - likely to be the Hawks, or possibly West Coast. If we finish 7th or 8th, it's "game over, " I am afraid.
The next 4 games will tell us where we are really at - Freo, Pies, Swans, North. The Swans will be our "absolute must win" match for 6th place.
Our best scenario is to finish 6th, which means a game against 3rd - likely to be the Hawks, or possibly West Coast. If we finish 7th or 8th, it's "game over, " I am afraid.
6th plays 7th.Junction Oval wrote:It would be nice to think that our situation has been so well planned by the maestro, Ross, but that's not reality.
The next 4 games will tell us where we are really at - Freo, Pies, Swans, North. The Swans will be our "absolute must win" match for 6th place.
Our best scenario is to finish 6th, which means a game against 3rd - likely to be the Hawks, or possibly West Coast. If we finish 7th or 8th, it's "game over, " I am afraid.
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Plugger's correction :Junction Oval wrote:
It would be nice to think that our situation has been so well planned by the maestro, Ross, but that's not reality.
The next 4 games will tell us where we are really at - Freo, Pies, Swans, North. The Swans will be our "absolute must win" match for 6th place.
Our best scenario is to finish 6th, which means a game against 3rd - likely to be the Hawks, or possibly West Coast. If we finish 7th or 8th, it's "game over, " I am afraid.
Right Plugger. Apologies, I must be into the second half of my bottle of wine! I will have to re-consider the finals options again.6th plays 7th.
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6594
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1292 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
A few more players need to follow Dal Santos example and start playing the best football of their lives.
Peake is doing that.
Steven is doing that.
I reckon Milne is doing that.
Kosi needs to.
Riewoldt needs to.
I reckon Armitage can up a gear
And Zac needs to get on the creatine and bicep curls to beef up those arms for the duel against Cloke.
Peake is doing that.
Steven is doing that.
I reckon Milne is doing that.
Kosi needs to.
Riewoldt needs to.
I reckon Armitage can up a gear
And Zac needs to get on the creatine and bicep curls to beef up those arms for the duel against Cloke.
What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Yes, but at 6th's home ground. If the teams are in different states it is 7th that has to hop on a plane there and back.plugger66 wrote:6th plays 7th.Junction Oval wrote:It would be nice to think that our situation has been so well planned by the maestro, Ross, but that's not reality.
The next 4 games will tell us where we are really at - Freo, Pies, Swans, North. The Swans will be our "absolute must win" match for 6th place.
Our best scenario is to finish 6th, which means a game against 3rd - likely to be the Hawks, or possibly West Coast. If we finish 7th or 8th, it's "game over, " I am afraid.
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23218
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 735 times
- Been thanked: 1778 times
Nice theory and look i want to believe it also.
BUT..
As much as talk about strategies and "tuning" players and game plans like they are roboitys/machines....facts are they arent.
IMO our recent form comes down to a few things:
1. We have slowly worked into the year - I do believe our delayed pre season has hampered us early and resulted in a slow start and losing 2 GF's did challenge them mentally (I know I felt like "oh shyte not this again..." so imagine how players doing the hard work felt?>??)
2. We (at the time we were struggling) hit all top sides......now we are hitting some form we are hitting bowwom sides......good for confidence but you will see in the next few weeks where we are truly at. In fact, I reckon Sydney game more than Collingwood atg Dome is the barometer.
3. Good players finding form - Goddard, Gilbert etc have hit some form. Dal been great all season. The good news here IMHO is that Goddard, Roo, Gilbert even Joey have more in them for mine...
4. Settled team with right mix of role players getting the footy to the good players hands - when we are at our best thats what we do well no doubt.
Id love to win the flag but cant see it BUT if we have a decent finals series then IMHO the depth we have uncovered in 2011 will make us stronger in 2012. I can see a retrun to top 4 next year IF we just get a half decent run from injury.
BUT..
As much as talk about strategies and "tuning" players and game plans like they are roboitys/machines....facts are they arent.
IMO our recent form comes down to a few things:
1. We have slowly worked into the year - I do believe our delayed pre season has hampered us early and resulted in a slow start and losing 2 GF's did challenge them mentally (I know I felt like "oh shyte not this again..." so imagine how players doing the hard work felt?>??)
2. We (at the time we were struggling) hit all top sides......now we are hitting some form we are hitting bowwom sides......good for confidence but you will see in the next few weeks where we are truly at. In fact, I reckon Sydney game more than Collingwood atg Dome is the barometer.
3. Good players finding form - Goddard, Gilbert etc have hit some form. Dal been great all season. The good news here IMHO is that Goddard, Roo, Gilbert even Joey have more in them for mine...
4. Settled team with right mix of role players getting the footy to the good players hands - when we are at our best thats what we do well no doubt.
Id love to win the flag but cant see it BUT if we have a decent finals series then IMHO the depth we have uncovered in 2011 will make us stronger in 2012. I can see a retrun to top 4 next year IF we just get a half decent run from injury.
“Yeah….nah””
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 25303
- Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
- Location: Trump Tower
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 284 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Sydney with Roos, Misson and Lyon used to confound the competition by peaking just as the need arose. Some how they would drift all season then just sneak up and grind out wins. Can see us sneaking into the prelim and if you get there it is anyones game. I'm just glad we aren't tanking for pick 20 in a s*** draft.
- desertsaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
- Location: out there
- Has thanked: 187 times
- Been thanked: 705 times
rather meet them in the prelim myself - rather lose that one to them. if we do beat them then we go in knowing we can beat anyone.noob wrote:You would probably rather finish 5th or 8th so you can avoid collingwood till the GF rather than the prelim. The rest we're pretty competitive.
"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Yep, Collingwood in the grandfinal- no thanks.desertsaint wrote:rather meet them in the prelim myself - rather lose that one to them. if we do beat them then we go in knowing we can beat anyone.noob wrote:You would probably rather finish 5th or 8th so you can avoid collingwood till the GF rather than the prelim. The rest we're pretty competitive.
Re: Pre- season --- all going to plan!
St.Carl wrote:As an eternal optomist I am taking a very different view of this year's 'home and away' series.
GO SAINTS!
hope you are right...too scarred to dream.....
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004 11:27pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 8:23am
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Interesting thoughts, but which is better - meeting a Collingwood side in a Prelim when they are still hungry to reach the GF, or meet an over-confident Collingwood in the GF and trample over them.#1GILL wrote:Yep, Collingwood in the grandfinal- no thanks.desertsaint wrote:rather meet them in the prelim myself - rather lose that one to them. if we do beat them then we go in knowing we can beat anyone.noob wrote:You would probably rather finish 5th or 8th so you can avoid collingwood till the GF rather than the prelim. The rest we're pretty competitive.
I reckon we take it a week at a time - but I think we'll be 6th with a home final and then give it a real crack from then on - injuries and match review panel permitting.
GO SAINTS
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004 11:27pm
While I like to think I am an optimist, it is a bit of a stretch. All those games that we lead and ended up losing at the start of the season would no doubt have been turning Lyon grey. If we had won those, the slow start would not appear to be as slow as it actually was. In fact we could have been top 4 or atleast on the brink. Cats, Tigers, Blues were all winnable with us leading in the 4th and losing by less than a goal (+draw), also forfeiting a 32 point lead to the Hawks.
Also notably is the fact that 3 of those teams make up the top4 suggesting how good we were to remain that close. If thats us playing slow, then the 2011 Saints on a roll would be comparable to 2009. I just don't think they are that good.
But I do hope I am wrong and we match that 09 streak at the right end of the season this time round. Playing out 4 quarters and an in form Roo may be all we need to do so.
Also notably is the fact that 3 of those teams make up the top4 suggesting how good we were to remain that close. If thats us playing slow, then the 2011 Saints on a roll would be comparable to 2009. I just don't think they are that good.
But I do hope I am wrong and we match that 09 streak at the right end of the season this time round. Playing out 4 quarters and an in form Roo may be all we need to do so.
- Verdun66
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
- Location: Dubai, UAE
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2 times
I'm with Stinger. Too scarred to dream.
But... in 2009 we came out and blitzed everything and everybody, and late season had a lull, and never really regained the form of earlier. We should have won the game though.
2010 we stuttered along, and lost Rooey, and never really hit 2009 form. Bingo, we nearly win the first GF. Blown away in the second out of steam.
2011....who knows. I'll take what comes, no expectations.
But... in 2009 we came out and blitzed everything and everybody, and late season had a lull, and never really regained the form of earlier. We should have won the game though.
2010 we stuttered along, and lost Rooey, and never really hit 2009 form. Bingo, we nearly win the first GF. Blown away in the second out of steam.
2011....who knows. I'll take what comes, no expectations.