lets nick name him doug
he's done Dan
Lendog
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Nice stat matrix
But how could dal have 8 clangers in 37 poss and have 85% efficiency??
Oi would assume a clanger is inefficient, yes
That means dal must have 78% efficiency at the very most....thats saying every other possesion is 100%......by my maths
My oponion i that Jack is a very good young player
Has messy disposal, like ray, gram, gilbert, peake, polo....he is not clean by foot.... Especially when he tries to kick short whilst running flat out..
He has a lot of other areas he is very good in
Clears the ball well, and hits it at full tilt
But how could dal have 8 clangers in 37 poss and have 85% efficiency??
Oi would assume a clanger is inefficient, yes
That means dal must have 78% efficiency at the very most....thats saying every other possesion is 100%......by my maths
My oponion i that Jack is a very good young player
Has messy disposal, like ray, gram, gilbert, peake, polo....he is not clean by foot.... Especially when he tries to kick short whilst running flat out..
He has a lot of other areas he is very good in
Clears the ball well, and hits it at full tilt