"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
And if there were 17 North Melbournes the competition would have folded years ago!saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
Why is he so bad for saying that?saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
that might be true. us saints fans sees things through rose coloured glasses. Would n't we love it if the saints kicked 15-20 goals occasionally. when was the last timne we did kick 20 goals in a game. We can defend ok. but we sure give the fans a scare.saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
I agree. it isnt great to watch and we follow the club. Anyone who doesnt agree should talk to their mates who dont follow us. Look how many saints supporters on here had a go at the club after the North game and we won.saintjake wrote:Why is he so bad for saying that?saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
we Do play very un-attractive footy. Its just a honest statement.
Dr Spaceman wrote:And if there were 17 North Melbournes the competition would have folded years ago!saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
I reckon some of our supporters went a bit over the top.plugger66 wrote:I agree. it isnt great to watch and we follow the club. Anyone who doesnt agree should talk to their mates who dont follow us. Look how many saints supporters on here had a go at the club after the North game and we won.saintjake wrote:Why is he so bad for saying that?saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
we Do play very un-attractive footy. Its just a honest statement.
I thought that Hawthorn did that in 2008 (the 2004 Premiers also played a similar game) and we "improved" upon it in 2009 and then Collingwood took over in 2010. I note that Geelong is now playing "our style" of footy (against top sides at least) and its results are very similar to us in 2009. Have a look at Round 1 for evidence.Thinline wrote:So the team that pretty much revolutionised the game two years ago is a worthless blight on the code now....
Apart from the fact he's a knob and thinks nothing of trashing holiday houses in North East Victoria, King has a point....it's the worst game style in the comp and what have we got to show for it...pictures of Geelong and the filth rejoicing.....saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
We not only failed to score a goal in the last quarter, we failed to score. Any other team would have beaten us.Dr Spaceman wrote:
I watched the replay again today and didn't see too much wrong with the first 3 quarters. Sure we failed to score a goal in the last but it has been suggested the players were a bit spent after the bye.
We got the win we were after and there was some pretty good footy on display til 3/4 time.
McClure is a d**khead...... King is a d**khead......stinger wrote:kings comments were nothing compared to the spray we copped from mcclure......he said no-one will want to come to the saints when free agency comes in because no-one would enjoy playing the s*** football we play.....and that even our own players don't like it...also no kid wants to be drafted by the saints as they don't get a look in in the first three years.....there was heaps more too.......
If you were a free agent and could choose where you wanted to go, would you honestly choose St Kilda over say Collingwood, Carlton, Hawthorn etc? Well, dumb question really cause you support St Kilda and would definitely choose Saintsstinger wrote:kings comments were nothing compared to the spray we copped from mcclure......he said no-one will want to come to the saints when free agency comes in because no-one would enjoy playing the s*** football we play.....and that even our own players don't like it...also no kid wants to be drafted by the saints as they don't get a look in in the first three years.....there was heaps more too.......
Sure. Let's replace 'St Kilda' with 'Sydney' then, or 'Richmond', or 'Port'...gee, that's better.saintjake wrote:Why is he so bad for saying that?saint tash wrote:David King on Foxtel's AFL360 :
"If there were 17 St Kilda's the AFL would have got $8.50 for the TV rights deal instead of $1.253 Billion".
Who does this chump think he is???? Anyone else here it or see it???
with steam coming out of my ears.
we Do play very un-attractive footy. Its just a honest statement.