Heavy-handed moderating?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Heavy-handed moderating?
I notice the thread about Luke Ball has been locked. I can't see any undue abuse or anything else inappropriate on it.
I assume somebody has locked it because he/she thought it was irrelevant, "we should all move on", "forumites sick of people going on and on about this", etc.
If so, these people were free not to open the thread.
I don't think threads should be locked because some people don't find the subject matter to be interesting. It's particularly bizarre when they go to the trouble of opening the thread and expressing this opinion.
Anyway, Mr or Ms Mod: I would appreciate if you would explain yourself. I hope I'm being unfair and have missed something that meant the thread
needed to be closed.
P.S. I notice that the thread for the grammar pedants remains unlocked. If it goes on too much longer I might have to post my concerns about inappropriate use of the gerundive form and the ablative and vocative cases.
I assume somebody has locked it because he/she thought it was irrelevant, "we should all move on", "forumites sick of people going on and on about this", etc.
If so, these people were free not to open the thread.
I don't think threads should be locked because some people don't find the subject matter to be interesting. It's particularly bizarre when they go to the trouble of opening the thread and expressing this opinion.
Anyway, Mr or Ms Mod: I would appreciate if you would explain yourself. I hope I'm being unfair and have missed something that meant the thread
needed to be closed.
P.S. I notice that the thread for the grammar pedants remains unlocked. If it goes on too much longer I might have to post my concerns about inappropriate use of the gerundive form and the ablative and vocative cases.
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
- stkildathunda
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Mon 10 Aug 2009 11:03am
- Location: Inside The Circle Of Zen
- Contact:
Same here, thought it must have been my internet but obviously not... Also been getting logged out even though i have it as keep me logged in all time....Mr Magic wrote:Been happening to me over the past couple of weeks - seems really slow today (at times).SainterK wrote:Anyone else having issues with SS again....slow, unresponsive, double posting....seems all to familiar, is someone about to wreak havoc?
That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18842
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
Careful. They may lock this one too.SENsaintsational wrote:That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Stop being so vicious and aggressive PavSaintPav wrote:Careful. They may lock this one too.SENsaintsational wrote:That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18842
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
joffaboy wrote:Stop being so vicious and aggressive PavSaintPav wrote:Careful. They may lock this one too.SENsaintsational wrote:That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18842
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1568 times
- Been thanked: 1962 times
joffaboy wrote:Stop being so vicious and aggressive PavSaintPav wrote:Careful. They may lock this one too.SENsaintsational wrote:That last comment is exactly what Moderation is.Johnny Member wrote:I'm not one for forum politics, but in that thread there were clearly some posters getting personal and aggressive.SENsaintsational wrote:A thread should not be locked unless it contravenes the guidelines of the site.
Which also allow for moderator discretion.
I personally have always voiced my opinion against locking threads until locking it is the only viable option.
In this case, it appears that the subject bores some people and the Mods reacted.
Locking threads is a cop out.
And for absolutely no apparent reason.
If a mod can lock the thread, it's probably easier to just tap the aggressive and viscous posters on the shoulder and ask them to calm down.
"Hey fellas, cool it or take it off the board. Otherwise your posts will be edited to remove the abuse or as a last resort the thread will be locked."
Locking a thread should be a last resort not the first one.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:18am
- Location: Noble Park
Here's what I was subjected to when I simply asked why there were so few supporters at one of the MCG games:
Posts: 2113
PostPosted: Sun 15 May 2011 11:46pm Post subject: Reply with quote
I had my familt at the "Walking with Dinosaurs" show for my young son's birthday if that's Ok with you? If not, get f***ed !!
And last week I was interstate for work and didn't get to that game either - OK with you if I make a living?
Unfortunately for many of us we don't have the luxury of being able to run our lives around a footy fixture. My family membership and social club membership are one step from being simple donations to the club. Fortunately next week we will be able to go and the whole family will be there - does that meet your standards you judgmental f***?[/i]
How does that go with the moderators in terms of abuse?
Posts: 2113
PostPosted: Sun 15 May 2011 11:46pm Post subject: Reply with quote
I had my familt at the "Walking with Dinosaurs" show for my young son's birthday if that's Ok with you? If not, get f***ed !!
And last week I was interstate for work and didn't get to that game either - OK with you if I make a living?
Unfortunately for many of us we don't have the luxury of being able to run our lives around a footy fixture. My family membership and social club membership are one step from being simple donations to the club. Fortunately next week we will be able to go and the whole family will be there - does that meet your standards you judgmental f***?[/i]
How does that go with the moderators in terms of abuse?
In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1717
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 2:18am
- Location: Noble Park
Here is another one:
f*** off. i was there yesterday, and apart from the first half an hour it was a pretty miserable experience.
so should i keep turning up each week to watch a playing group who barely put in? am i supposed to enjoy that? why would i spend so much time doing something i can't control which is making me unhappy?
obviously people will turn up less when we're losing. it's just not as much fun for anyone involved. it makes no difference to whether we win or lose, so who cares?
if you have no better way to spend your time then by all means go along to the footy. personally, i'll be there a lot less for the remainder of the year.
f*** off. i was there yesterday, and apart from the first half an hour it was a pretty miserable experience.
so should i keep turning up each week to watch a playing group who barely put in? am i supposed to enjoy that? why would i spend so much time doing something i can't control which is making me unhappy?
obviously people will turn up less when we're losing. it's just not as much fun for anyone involved. it makes no difference to whether we win or lose, so who cares?
if you have no better way to spend your time then by all means go along to the footy. personally, i'll be there a lot less for the remainder of the year.
In honour of those who went before, in the dark and desperate years.
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1198 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times