I was watching that episode closely for a few minutes. Hansen was "into" Rooey all the time, including kneeing Rooey in the back of the leg (around the hamstring area). It was aggressive, rather than niggling stuff. Rooey gave very little back IMO.
I thought that the umpire was telling Hansen to cut it out, not the other way around. From a reporting viewpoint - nothing in it.
riewoldt in trouble over knee
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
I reckon 50 points or something - reprimand. no force and no impact and not high.Junction Oval wrote:I was watching that episode closely for a few minutes. Hansen was "into" Rooey all the time, including kneeing Rooey in the back of the leg (around the hamstring area). It was aggressive, rather than niggling stuff. Rooey gave very little back IMO.
I thought that the umpire was telling Hansen to cut it out, not the other way around. From a reporting viewpoint - nothing in it.
In the unlikely event Rooey got a week - would Cahill be any shot as a dark-horse "shock" inclusion?
-
Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Coming off 1 goal in 1 senior VFL game, following a lengthy absence through injury and an unimpressive first couple of years at the club, I'd say........... NO!Con Gorozidis wrote:I reckon 50 points or something - reprimand. no force and no impact and not high.Junction Oval wrote:I was watching that episode closely for a few minutes. Hansen was "into" Rooey all the time, including kneeing Rooey in the back of the leg (around the hamstring area). It was aggressive, rather than niggling stuff. Rooey gave very little back IMO.
I thought that the umpire was telling Hansen to cut it out, not the other way around. From a reporting viewpoint - nothing in it.
In the unlikely event Rooey got a week - would Cahill be any shot as a dark-horse "shock" inclusion?
-
Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Well thats why it would be a "shock".Dr Spaceman wrote:Coming off 1 goal in 1 senior VFL game, following a lengthy absence through injury and an unimpressive first couple of years at the club, I'd say........... NO!Con Gorozidis wrote:I reckon 50 points or something - reprimand. no force and no impact and not high.Junction Oval wrote:I was watching that episode closely for a few minutes. Hansen was "into" Rooey all the time, including kneeing Rooey in the back of the leg (around the hamstring area). It was aggressive, rather than niggling stuff. Rooey gave very little back IMO.
I thought that the umpire was telling Hansen to cut it out, not the other way around. From a reporting viewpoint - nothing in it.
In the unlikely event Rooey got a week - would Cahill be any shot as a dark-horse "shock" inclusion?
