We are on 18 points (4 wins and a draw). If we....
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
- saintdooley
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Mon 20 Feb 2006 2:32pm
i agree. i have not been abused in over 3 hours now. where is joffa and pav? im bored.Stillwaiting wrote:Has to be one of the most entertaining threads in a long time, some great vortex's going
"Another storied win in Robert Harvey's career. They say he is the embodiment of their motto of strength through loyalty, and on the day he became just the tenth man to play 350 league games the saints reward him with a seemingly impossible victory."
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
or in a ss thread that keeps increasing in size and depthDr Spaceman wrote:From Wikipedia:Stillwaiting wrote:Has to be one of the most entertaining threads in a long time, some great vortex's going
"A vortex can be seen in the spiraling motion of air or liquid around a center of rotation"
Nice use of grammar Stillwaiting
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
I love this club
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
i thought the grammer Nazi's were hiding in the other thread.Dr Spaceman wrote:And of course even if vortexs was correct it should have been vortexs and not vortex's.InkerSaint wrote:The plural of vortex is vortices although vortexes is accepted as well.
Looks like I was too quick off the mark in congratulating Stillwaiting
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I love this club
Isnt grammar with an A.Stillwaiting wrote:i thought the grammer Nazi's were hiding in the other thread.Dr Spaceman wrote:And of course even if vortexs was correct it should have been vortexs and not vortex's.InkerSaint wrote:The plural of vortex is vortices although vortexes is accepted as well.
Looks like I was too quick off the mark in congratulating Stillwaiting
And shouldnt that have a question mark you idiot?plugger66 wrote:Isnt grammar with an A.Stillwaiting wrote:i thought the grammer Nazi's were hiding in the other thread.Dr Spaceman wrote:And of course even if vortexs was correct it should have been vortexs and not vortex's.InkerSaint wrote:The plural of vortex is vortices although vortexes is accepted as well.
Looks like I was too quick off the mark in congratulating Stillwaiting
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
probably is a gooder way to spell itplugger66 wrote:Isnt grammar with an A.Stillwaiting wrote:i thought the grammer Nazi's were hiding in the other thread.Dr Spaceman wrote:And of course even if vortexs was correct it should have been vortexs and not vortex's.InkerSaint wrote:The plural of vortex is vortices although vortexes is accepted as well.
Looks like I was too quick off the mark in congratulating Stillwaiting
I love this club
I is here - F**K OffMr Magic wrote:Shouldn't that be 'where are joffa and pav?'saintdooley wrote:i agree. i have not been abused in over 3 hours now. where is joffa and pav? im bored.Stillwaiting wrote:Has to be one of the most entertaining threads in a long time, some great vortex's going
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Lance or James??
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun 25 May 2008 5:39pm
joffaboy wrote:I is here - F**K OffMr Magic wrote:Shouldn't that be 'where are joffa and pav?'saintdooley wrote:i agree. i have not been abused in over 3 hours now. where is joffa and pav? im bored.Stillwaiting wrote:Has to be one of the most entertaining threads in a long time, some great vortex's going
That should be" I am here - f*** off please
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I love this club
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2010 11:35am
- Been thanked: 1198 times
Over on Bigfooty, tricking the swear filter will get you a yellow card!!!joffaboy wrote:I is here - F**K OffMr Magic wrote:Shouldn't that be 'where are joffa and pav?'saintdooley wrote:i agree. i have not been abused in over 3 hours now. where is joffa and pav? im bored.Stillwaiting wrote:Has to be one of the most entertaining threads in a long time, some great vortex's going
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 3:26pm
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18580
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1906 times
- Been thanked: 843 times
you ought to knowSt Nick wrote:That is CRAP. Collingfilth TANKED in 2005 which netted them Dale Thomas and Scott Pendlebury. Even Collingfilth supporters admit that.SainterSoul wrote:Tanking games should not be an option - EVER! Need to promote a winning culture, and "tanking" will not provide that.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 3:26pm
Collingwood were rebuilding throughout that period - not sure I clasify that as tanking. Do you think we tanked to pick up Roo and Kosi?
Early draft picks help, but they are not the solution. A winning culture has a massive impact on a team. For instance, the Hawks are playing with a belief in their team at the moment. One could even argue the Cats last week were decimated and it made no difference.
Early draft picks help, but they are not the solution. A winning culture has a massive impact on a team. For instance, the Hawks are playing with a belief in their team at the moment. One could even argue the Cats last week were decimated and it made no difference.
Do you think I'm a Collingfilth supporter??bigcarl wrote:you ought to knowSt Nick wrote:That is CRAP. Collingfilth TANKED in 2005 which netted them Dale Thomas and Scott Pendlebury. Even Collingfilth supporters admit that.SainterSoul wrote:Tanking games should not be an option - EVER! Need to promote a winning culture, and "tanking" will not provide that.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 3:26pm
Isn't it obvious that he does?St Nick wrote:Do you think I'm a Collingfilth supporter??bigcarl wrote:you ought to knowSt Nick wrote:That is CRAP. Collingfilth TANKED in 2005 which netted them Dale Thomas and Scott Pendlebury. Even Collingfilth supporters admit that.SainterSoul wrote:Tanking games should not be an option - EVER! Need to promote a winning culture, and "tanking" will not provide that.
They were not rebuilding, they deliberately tanked. Played the youngsters and put everyone in for season ending surgery.SainterSoul wrote:Collingwood were rebuilding throughout that period - not sure I clasify that as tanking. Do you think we tanked to pick up Roo and Kosi?
Early draft picks help, but they are not the solution. A winning culture has a massive impact on a team. For instance, the Hawks are playing with a belief in their team at the moment. One could even argue the Cats last week were decimated and it made no difference.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 3:26pm
Their team from the early 2000s had their shot, they were never going to win a GF. Obviously in your eyes it's a thin line between a team tanking and a team seeing who is going to be part of their future.St Nick wrote:They were not rebuilding, they deliberately tanked. Played the youngsters and put everyone in for season ending surgery.SainterSoul wrote:Collingwood were rebuilding throughout that period - not sure I clasify that as tanking. Do you think we tanked to pick up Roo and Kosi?
Early draft picks help, but they are not the solution. A winning culture has a massive impact on a team. For instance, the Hawks are playing with a belief in their team at the moment. One could even argue the Cats last week were decimated and it made no difference.