Kosi was all right tonight. Far from the worst. Gave it 100 per cent and took a couple of nice marks.
Whether his form had earned a game is up for debate, though.
Kosi in/ Blake out
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
-
mr six o'clock
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
agree the pruck scarlet got away with murder tonight !!!!stinger wrote:kossi was okay...until his lack of fitness and match play caught up with him.....but...there has got to be something wrong with roo...
...oh...and for the record......when is a push in the back ..or an arm chop not a free...????...when the victim is a saints forward with a surname starting with k or r......ffs......not saying the umps were cheating.....just that they were making sure their bets were safe......
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
-
bigcarl
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
-
mr six o'clock
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4304
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
agree , scarlet gets away with murderstinger wrote:kossi was okay...until his lack of fitness and match play caught up with him.....but...there has got to be something wrong with roo...
...oh...and for the record......when is a push in the back ..or an arm chop not a free...????...when the victim is a saints forward with a surname starting with k or r......ffs......not saying the umps were cheating.....just that they were making sure their bets were safe......
I agree Carl, and I am glad you made that point a few times. 
He looked switched on, and dangerous, and I would of moved him into the 50 much, much earlier.
The amount of times they were pushed under the ball, clear hands in the back, was shocking....but the amount of times they got away with doing it when they had jumped off the ground, and it's so very dangerous, quite a lot of what looked an awful lot like tunneling to me.
He looked switched on, and dangerous, and I would of moved him into the 50 much, much earlier.
The amount of times they were pushed under the ball, clear hands in the back, was shocking....but the amount of times they got away with doing it when they had jumped off the ground, and it's so very dangerous, quite a lot of what looked an awful lot like tunneling to me.
Last edited by SainterK on Sun 19 Jun 2011 1:05am, edited 1 time in total.
I thought the same. Thrilled to see him not only play, but play well. He was much better than just being 'servicable'. FFS, give the guy credit where it is due!SainterK wrote:I agree Carl, and I am glad you made that point a few times.
He looked switched on, and dangerous, and I would of moved him into the 50 much, much earlier.
The amount of times they were pushed under the ball, clear hands in the back, was shocking....but the amount of times they got away with doing it when they had jumped off the ground, and it's so very dangerous, quite a lot of what looked an awful lot like tunneling to me.
Not his fault that they changed the rules and made it that the St Kilda forwards (or any one in our FWD 50 that had a St Kilda jumper on) were allowed to be chopped, hit, swiped, tunnelled and everything else you could possible imagine without being paid a free. Perhaps if a memo was sent to the coaching staff prior to the game, we could have fixed that issue for game day?
Fortius Quo Fidelius