Who would appeal to GWS from our list?

borderbarry · Thu 16 Jun 2011 5:53pm

If we decide to take part in trading for the 4 GWS 17 yr olds, or even a high draft pick from GWS, apart from our untouchables, which of our players would have appeal for GWS?

I would list our untouchables as :-
B.J.
Roo
Lenny
Sam Fisher
Ben McEvoy

Add who you consider untouchable.

saintbrat · Post: # 1090697Post **saintbrat** » Thu 16 Jun 2011 5:58pm

Untouchable :Joey and Jimmy ?

saint66au · Post: # 1090704Post **saint66au** » Thu 16 Jun 2011 6:13pm

borderbarry wrote:If we decide to take part in trading for the 4 GWS 17 yr olds, or even a high draft pick from GWS, apart from our untouchables, which of our players would have appeal for GWS?

I would list our untouchables as :-
B.J.
Roo
Lenny
Sam Fisher
Ben McEvoy

Add who you consider untouchable.

Noone excpet the players we really must retain would commend even a mid-level GWS draft pick. For a high pick one of the untouchables would have to go

Anyone who thinks our list has the same depth of value as Collingwood or Geelong is kididng themselves Im afraid.

desertsaint · Thu 16 Jun 2011 6:13pm

siposs
steven
ledger
our future

bakes
milney
blake
our past

Wollongong_saint · Thu 16 Jun 2011 6:19pm

desertsaint wrote:siposs

bakes
milney
blake
our past

That's a bit harsh. I'd say Milney is definitely a big part of our PRESENT and most certainly a part of our future.

desertsaint · Thu 16 Jun 2011 7:59pm

Wollongong_saint wrote:
desertsaint wrote:siposs

bakes
milney
blake
our past
That's a bit harsh. I'd say Milney is definitely a big part of our PRESENT and most certainly a part of our future.

would definitely agree - didn't mean those players were past it - meant that we owe them the same loyalty and committment that they've shown us.
my bad.

gringo · Post: # 1090853Post **gringo** » Thu 16 Jun 2011 9:23pm

Ross lyon?

RW&B · Post: # 1090948Post **RW&B** » Fri 17 Jun 2011 12:47am

gringo wrote:Ross lyon?

Untouchable

noreason41 · Fri 17 Jun 2011 12:56am

Gilbert & Goddard are the only ones i think they would even really look at.
Both are younger then most on our list.

I think they'd be more tempted to recruiting KPP, build a spine first, and then play kids.

We don't have many KPP that are young enough and good enough for them to look at.

matrix · Post: # 1090954Post **matrix** » Fri 17 Jun 2011 12:59am

im happy to let gilbert go

not bj, jimmy, chips, joey, roo, ledger, cripps, sipo, steven dal, bigboy, lynch, walsh

hungry for a premiership · Fri 17 Jun 2011 1:01am

The only realistic situation that would see us attain a pick high enough of obtaining a future champion would be for one of the "untouchables" to go.

So, which untouchable is it, if any? Maybe GWS comes along and makes a massive offer for one, and then it will really be up to the player in question, won't it? If he decides to stay. Great. If he goes and we get a future champion in compensation... Well, that's not such a bad thing either.

Behind Play · Fri 17 Jun 2011 10:04am

Hopefully Clarke & Dawson

Waltzing St Kilda · Fri 17 Jun 2011 10:12am

They are interested in Dawson. Inside word.

borderbarry · Fri 17 Jun 2011 10:18am

I think a change from St.Kilda may benefit Sam Gilbert. The pre-season business seems to have affected his play and maybe he needs a change.

dcstkfc · Post: # 1091171Post **dcstkfc** » Fri 17 Jun 2011 8:26pm

No one's absolutely untouchable. If they offered 6 first-round picks for Roo, I reckon we'd take it.

Moorabbin Saints · Fri 17 Jun 2011 10:46pm

Gilbert may certainly be a target.

If we can snag a first rounder for him, take it for sure.

Teflon · Post: # 1091209Post **Teflon** » Fri 17 Jun 2011 10:57pm

Waltzing St Kilda wrote:They are interested in Dawson. Inside word.

That seems far fetched.

SainterK · Post: # 1091269Post **SainterK** » Sat 18 Jun 2011 1:54am

Uncontracted end of this year, Gilbert Stanley Armo

End of next year, Goddard Joey Lenny

matrix · Post: # 1091312Post **matrix** » Sat 18 Jun 2011 11:36am

"The highlights include giving Team GWS nine first round picks in 2011, the top eight rookie picks next year, zoned access to players from NSW, ACT and the Northern Territory, access to 16 uncontracted players and the right to have an expanded list and increased salary cap.

The club will have picks 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15 in the 2011 NAB AFL Draft."

hmm thought they might have given them picks 1,3,5

id like to see armo and stanley stay

borderbarry · Sat 18 Jun 2011 12:04pm

Who has Pick No.1?
The wooden spooner from this year?
GWS?
Gold Coast Suns?
On last year it should be GWS.

matrix · Post: # 1091330Post **matrix** » Sat 18 Jun 2011 12:26pm

actually bb this link says gws get it, yet the older afl one i quoted earlier said they didnt

http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/10/21/we ... raft-help/

RECRUITING CONCESSIONS FOR THE WESTERN SYDNEY CLUB WHICH WILL ENTER THE AFL in 2012:
* Picks 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15 and first pick in each subsequent round in 2011 national draft.
* Can sign a total of up to 16 uncontracted players from existing AFL clubs at end of 2011 and 2012
* Can sign 12 17-year-olds in 2010.
* A total of four extra 17-year-olds in 2011 and 2012 to be traded to other clubs.
* First eight picks in 2010 rookie draft
* Can sign 10 players previously on AFL lists or previously nominated for draft in 2010-11.
* Can sign 16 players from southern NSW/ACT from 2010-13.
* Northern Territory as recruiting zone from 2011-13.

they have to get pick one like gc did and the spooners will get pick four like this year??

Waltzing St Kilda · Sat 18 Jun 2011 12:26pm

Teflon wrote:
Waltzing St Kilda wrote:They are interested in Dawson. Inside word.
That seems far fetched.

Just remember who the GWS list manager is.

Who would appeal to GWS from our list?

Who would appeal to GWS from our list?

Re: Who would appeal to GWS from our list?