We have big marking Players!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
We have big marking Players!
Most of our big players are defenders so we need to start playing some up forward NOW to help rooy out.
Walsh would be good but they wont play him up forward for sandy.He has the body strength,and pace.He needs the experience but he carnt get that playing for Sandy.
Then there is Archer and Stanley,Archer should be persiterd with he has played only 2 games and is definatly a prospect but you need to play these guys not for 1,2 games but more give him opportunitys.Archer is big and strong and would be a great asset with time playing with a experienced forward.
Stanley has gone off the boil a bit but still stick with him he is very hard to match up on because of his height and speed.
What all these guys need is game time in the seniors we have 10 games left its now or never if they dont play now we can kiss next season good by.
ITs no point saying half way through next season or we should have played a few young talls last season to get some experience we need to do it now be smart with our team selection.
Walsh would be good but they wont play him up forward for sandy.He has the body strength,and pace.He needs the experience but he carnt get that playing for Sandy.
Then there is Archer and Stanley,Archer should be persiterd with he has played only 2 games and is definatly a prospect but you need to play these guys not for 1,2 games but more give him opportunitys.Archer is big and strong and would be a great asset with time playing with a experienced forward.
Stanley has gone off the boil a bit but still stick with him he is very hard to match up on because of his height and speed.
What all these guys need is game time in the seniors we have 10 games left its now or never if they dont play now we can kiss next season good by.
ITs no point saying half way through next season or we should have played a few young talls last season to get some experience we need to do it now be smart with our team selection.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
"Schneider, here is Hayes belting forward....GODDARD!"
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
Have you seen them standing side by side? I have and there's not much in it.Tiprat44 wrote:Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Granted he is growing but do you think he will reach the size required for a FF?Bernard Shakey wrote:Have you seen them standing side by side? I have and there's not much in it.Tiprat44 wrote:Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
"Schneider, here is Hayes belting forward....GODDARD!"
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11237
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 120 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
What size is that exactly?Tiprat44 wrote:Granted he is growing but do you think he will reach the size required for a FF?Bernard Shakey wrote:Have you seen them standing side by side? I have and there's not much in it.Tiprat44 wrote:Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Well i haven't seen many 85kg full forwards since John Coleman and I think it'd be a bit unfair to compare Sippos to him.Bernard Shakey wrote:What size is that exactly?Tiprat44 wrote:Granted he is growing but do you think he will reach the size required for a FF?Bernard Shakey wrote:Have you seen them standing side by side? I have and there's not much in it.Tiprat44 wrote:Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
"Schneider, here is Hayes belting forward....GODDARD!"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18579
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1905 times
- Been thanked: 841 times
Hope he kicks a few tomorrow and puts pressure on for re-inclusion. I hope he's given the opportunity to play his natural role as a forward down there because we sure as hell need one.Bernard Shakey wrote:What size is that exactly?Tiprat44 wrote:Granted he is growing but do you think he will reach the size required for a FF?Bernard Shakey wrote:Have you seen them standing side by side? I have and there's not much in it.Tiprat44 wrote:Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.Bernard Shakey wrote:18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.Tiprat44 wrote:I didn't think Siposs was that tall?Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times