Dawson- a major worry for me
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 263
- Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005 10:38am
- Location: Geelong
Firstly let me say I think Dawson has been very good down back this year, following on from last season. He is very solid on the spoil and is rarely beaten in a one on one contest, somewhat surprsingly.
However, I agree that his physical presence in terms of tackling and crunching opposition forwards is almost non-existent now, and, like Gram, is laughable at times. There are occasions when he just seems to run past guys and half-heartedly throws his arms out in what appears to be a pathetic attempt to grab them without even giving a toss. He does have this physical side to his game - he has shown it at times before - but it just seems to have disappeared at the moment, which is a concern.
I recall the G-train copping criticism for looking lazy and half-hearted at times too...perhaps we are being a bit harsh and he is one of those plays that just gives off that appearance somehow?
Either way, I think if he brought a bit of that mongrel back into his game he would be right up there with the better full-backs going around at the moment.
However, I agree that his physical presence in terms of tackling and crunching opposition forwards is almost non-existent now, and, like Gram, is laughable at times. There are occasions when he just seems to run past guys and half-heartedly throws his arms out in what appears to be a pathetic attempt to grab them without even giving a toss. He does have this physical side to his game - he has shown it at times before - but it just seems to have disappeared at the moment, which is a concern.
I recall the G-train copping criticism for looking lazy and half-hearted at times too...perhaps we are being a bit harsh and he is one of those plays that just gives off that appearance somehow?
Either way, I think if he brought a bit of that mongrel back into his game he would be right up there with the better full-backs going around at the moment.
Please...let's win a Premiership before GEELONG!!!! (O.k., so we've missed that opportunity...maybe let's win the next one before Geelong????)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9067
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 426 times
Gram is one of our better contributors this season..the captain should get his act together as should GilbertBigMart wrote:Gram.....how would you go having to accept a shortfront from the big sauce....grammy did one weak act, many times he took his turn
Gram played pretty well again....infact i reckon he would be top 6 in our b&f atm......which aint saying a lot i suppose
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4882
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 327 times
- Been thanked: 465 times
That's because the G-Train was as soft as butter. Looked tough and could snarl and push and shove, but was a woeful tackler and hardly ever provided a good contest in a pack situation bringing the ball to ground, which I believe was b/c he was afraid to commit his body. Was lightening quick and agile for a big fella. Also not bad in a purely one on one situation, but had many weaknesses to his game that often appeared to get overlooked.wallbanger wrote:
I recall the G-train copping criticism for looking lazy and half-hearted at times too...perhaps we are being a bit harsh and he is one of those plays that just gives off that appearance somehow?
Zac's tackling needs to get fiercer for sure I reckon. Some blokes tackle because well, they have to. Other's tackle b/c they love it and tackle with real conviction. That effort highlighted on Ch 7 in the first quarter was cringe worthy. I would rather he gave away a free kick by being over zealous than run past his opponent and put half an arm out that flops when it makes contact with the opposition. Maybe we're all used to Max who looked like he would rather die than allow his opponent to get an easy kick? Max didn't have Zac's skill but even when beaten he looked like he was busting his arse. I'm sure Zac is as well, but they both have different personalities, and Zac sometimes gives the impression it's all a bit hard and he doesn't care as much. Like I said, I doubt that is the case, but that is what we've all become used to I reckon.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- SydneySainter
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2416
- Joined: Sat 26 May 2007 6:59pm
- Has thanked: 54 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
I've accepted that Dawson won't be our new Max. He is and will continue to be a solid full-back, 200 gamer, but I doubt he'll ever be regarded as one of the premier defenders.
He'll still improve. I don't think we've seen his best. As for last Thursday, he was okay, but probably would have been easily beaten by Leuenburger if the ball had been dry.
He'll still improve. I don't think we've seen his best. As for last Thursday, he was okay, but probably would have been easily beaten by Leuenburger if the ball had been dry.
Bad management is bad management
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Dawson is still "relatively" inexperienced but does a solid job and has performed on the big stage.SydneySainter wrote:I've accepted that Dawson won't be our new Max. He is and will continue to be a solid full-back, 200 gamer, but I doubt he'll ever be regarded as one of the premier defenders.
He'll still improve. I don't think we've seen his best. As for last Thursday, he was okay, but probably would have been easily beaten by Leuenburger if the ball had been dry.
If he is a problem then it's a problem that a few of our rivals would love to have.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
Is this a TV thing? I ask because if there's one thing that's become pretty clear to me about Dawson it's that he's an emotional unit.Moods wrote:That's because the G-Train was as soft as butter. Looked tough and could snarl and push and shove, but was a woeful tackler and hardly ever provided a good contest in a pack situation bringing the ball to ground, which I believe was b/c he was afraid to commit his body. Was lightening quick and agile for a big fella. Also not bad in a purely one on one situation, but had many weaknesses to his game that often appeared to get overlooked.wallbanger wrote:
I recall the G-train copping criticism for looking lazy and half-hearted at times too...perhaps we are being a bit harsh and he is one of those plays that just gives off that appearance somehow?
Zac's tackling needs to get fiercer for sure I reckon. Some blokes tackle because well, they have to. Other's tackle b/c they love it and tackle with real conviction. That effort highlighted on Ch 7 in the first quarter was cringe worthy. I would rather he gave away a free kick by being over zealous than run past his opponent and put half an arm out that flops when it makes contact with the opposition. Maybe we're all used to Max who looked like he would rather die than allow his opponent to get an easy kick? Max didn't have Zac's skill but even when beaten he looked like he was busting his arse. I'm sure Zac is as well, but they both have different personalities, and Zac sometimes gives the impression it's all a bit hard and he doesn't care as much. Like I said, I doubt that is the case, but that is what we've all become used to I reckon.
Before every game, he's getting into his opponent, he can't wait to line someone up for a bump, he loves to let the opposition know when they've messed up. When you see the scrums in our defensive line before the opening bounce, it's often Dawson who's started it.
It's a different kind of intensity to Max, who wanted to blanket his opponent. Zac want to win the contest, run off, get a touch, then run back and let the guy know about it.
The suggestion that Dawson doens't care surprises me greatly.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford
The game, quite possibly life also, has past them.SainterK wrote:Watched the game with my Pop tonight, he didn't like Dawsons game, I find not many older saints supporters rate him for some reason?
If he doesn't rate Dawson (or his last game).... what does he think of Kosi (or his last game)?
I feel like Kosi is a never ending bad joke... this guy can't play football anymore... it's just painful to watch... mostly because you know he is aware of it and you know he is an okay bloke.
Dawson holds his own.
Check out the replies on this thread though, a lot of who I presume are the older folk, don't rate him either.Beekay wrote:The game, quite possibly life also, has past them.SainterK wrote:Watched the game with my Pop tonight, he didn't like Dawsons game, I find not many older saints supporters rate him for some reason?
If he doesn't rate Dawson (or his last game).... what does he think of Kosi (or his last game)?
I feel like Kosi is a never ending bad joke... this guy can't play football anymore... it's just painful to watch... mostly because you know he is aware of it and you know he is an okay bloke.
Dawson holds his own.
Dunno why.
I think he'd be doing ok in the b&f votes at the moment.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
- Winmar7Fan
- Club Player
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Thu 08 May 2008 5:31pm
- Location: Gold Coast
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
As someone who was there, first sighting of Dawson v Brisbane was him starting a scrum in our defensive line by getting into Leuenberger before the opening bounce.Moods wrote:Which is ironic b/c didn't the OP say he was at the game? The rest of us probably weren'tCon Gorozidis wrote:Can we wind this thread up?
Seems about 90% strongly in favour of Zac. 10% against.
You have to see a game live to really appreciate how good Zac really is.
Certainly looked engaged in the game from the sidelines.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford
- St Chris
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Wed 05 Apr 2006 2:20pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
Perhaps Zac suffers from the Mark Waugh/Nick Dal Santo disease???
When it's all going well, their skill looks like it's all natural, like they were born to do it.
When things aren't going so great, they look lazy and disinterested.
They aren't actually trying any more or less, it's just a perception based on the outcome. If Zac closes down a leading forward and makes a great spoil, it looks fantastic, we all think he's the greatest full back since Silvagni. If he misses the spoil, he is lazy, too skinny etc...
Mark Waugh clips one off his pads through square leg for 4 and he is the most graceful batsmen to ever play the game. He gets an inside edge and clips it into leg stump, he's lazy, not watching the ball, trying to play extravagent shots etc...
When it's all going well, their skill looks like it's all natural, like they were born to do it.
When things aren't going so great, they look lazy and disinterested.
They aren't actually trying any more or less, it's just a perception based on the outcome. If Zac closes down a leading forward and makes a great spoil, it looks fantastic, we all think he's the greatest full back since Silvagni. If he misses the spoil, he is lazy, too skinny etc...
Mark Waugh clips one off his pads through square leg for 4 and he is the most graceful batsmen to ever play the game. He gets an inside edge and clips it into leg stump, he's lazy, not watching the ball, trying to play extravagent shots etc...