McQualter OUT
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- groupie1
- Club Player
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
McQualter OUT
How about the idea of using Armitage as the 'McQualter forward'? He did good up forward, he has good defensive and offensive sides to his game, but too slow for a permanent mid. And bring young Ledger and Cripps/Steven in to give us a bit of bite.
Time for mediocrity is over. McQualter/Peake OUT!
What do people think?
Time for mediocrity is over. McQualter/Peake OUT!
What do people think?
Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11322
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1312 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
If Mini and Peake are better than ALL the young similar sized players we have running around for Sandy we are in for a world of painSainternist wrote:McQualter and Peake should, ought and must be omitted.
For two guys that you'd think would be trying til they go blue in the face to maintain their spots in the side, they DO NOT cut the mustard.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
- groupie1
- Club Player
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Which is looking like the case.groupie1 wrote:Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
Which is very unfortunate for our long long long awaited premiership hopes.
What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
![Image](http://users.tpg.com.au/prothall//merlin.jpg)
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Likely replacements are there but have been hindered by injury, or are just into their development, or both.ralphsmith wrote:Which is looking like the case.groupie1 wrote:Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
Which is very unfortunate for our long long long awaited premiership hopes.
The exception is Al Smith who is up and running.
Even if he's not a direct replacement for those blokes he can be brought in and the side rejigged.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
I'm not arguing with that, I was extremely disappointed when I saw our team on Thursday night. I'd be playing SMith ahead of Peake and I think I'd have Steven, Schneider and maybe even Ledger instead of Mini, if they were available and fit.groupie1 wrote:Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Agree, but that would require flexibility and I'm not sure Ross is too familiar with that concept.Dr Spaceman wrote:Likely replacements are there but have been hindered by injury, or are just into their development, or both.ralphsmith wrote:Which is looking like the case.groupie1 wrote:Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
Which is very unfortunate for our long long long awaited premiership hopes.
The exception is Al Smith who is up and running.
Even if he's not a direct replacement for those blokes he can be brought in and the side rejigged.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
They weren't!AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:I'm not arguing with that, I was extremely disappointed when I saw our team on Thursday night. I'd be playing SMith ahead of Peake and I think I'd have Steven, Schneider and maybe even Ledger instead of Mini, if they were available and fit.groupie1 wrote:Ok, fair points. But, like the guy above you said, if Peake and Mcqual cannot be replaced we really have recruited poorly.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:Ledger apparently has a "6 weeks hammy", so we can rule him out and since Jack Steven just played his first game of the year today, I think we can safely predict that he won't be playing seniors for at least 3-4 weeks.
It's unfortunate, as both may well have been in the side last night had they been fully fit.
Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
- skeptic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 16878
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
- Has thanked: 3578 times
- Been thanked: 2842 times
I would have rather played an underdone Steven than put up with mini's ongoing pathetic performance
Any of
Cripps
Smith
Steven
Would be better
Heck even putting Tommy Walsh or Stanley in the team as extra KPP and not having ne1 do Mini's role (which we know will be ineffectove anyway) would have been better
Any of
Cripps
Smith
Steven
Would be better
Heck even putting Tommy Walsh or Stanley in the team as extra KPP and not having ne1 do Mini's role (which we know will be ineffectove anyway) would have been better
- Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Lyon said today on radio that Stanley didn't do enough last game to impress to get a spot last night. He had the door but didn't earn it.
He also said Gilbo didn't want to play forward. Glad to hear it.
Agree Mini wasn't good last night. At this stage could see Armo or Steven in the role. But I like Armo in the middle.
Plenty of time gents!
He also said Gilbo didn't want to play forward. Glad to hear it.
Agree Mini wasn't good last night. At this stage could see Armo or Steven in the role. But I like Armo in the middle.
Plenty of time gents!
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3465
- Joined: Fri 29 Oct 2004 1:01pm
- Has thanked: 91 times
- Been thanked: 162 times
Re: McQualter OUT
How about just killing the idea of a 'McQualter forward'? I worry that given too long in that role, Armo would just turn into Andrew McQualter or Robert Eddy. Same with the kids. I'd much rather see them get some time in the midfield and have a chance to succeed.groupie1 wrote:How about the idea of using Armitage as the 'McQualter forward'?
I'd like to see McQualter go back to Sandy and play in the middle. Whatever effectiveness he had as a forward is now long gone. He did well when teams were struggling with our press. Now teams our turning over the ball much higher on the ground.
I'm not sure who I'd play. Somebody that the coaching staff has enough faith in to play in the midfield. I'd like to see Joey, BJ and Dal spend some time up there and kick some goals.
Yeah nah pleasing positive
- groupie1
- Club Player
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: McQualter OUT
You make some good points there, man, 'killing the idea of the McQ forward.' Problem is the need to change the RL paradigm is more difficult than working within it and changing personnel. I reckon he's gonna want one.vacuous space wrote:How about just killing the idea of a 'McQualter forward'? I worry that given too long in that role, Armo would just turn into Andrew McQualter or Robert Eddy. Same with the kids. I'd much rather see them get some time in the midfield and have a chance to succeed.groupie1 wrote:How about the idea of using Armitage as the 'McQualter forward'?
I'd like to see McQualter go back to Sandy and play in the middle. Whatever effectiveness he had as a forward is now long gone. He did well when teams were struggling with our press. Now teams our turning over the ball much higher on the ground.
I'm not sure who I'd play. Somebody that the coaching staff has enough faith in to play in the midfield. I'd like to see Joey, BJ and Dal spend some time up there and kick some goals.
Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
- Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5817
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Contact:
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Shaun Burgoyne cost Hawthorn Mark Williams and pick 9.
We were minus a tall forward on Friday, so for McQualter and Peake out the ins would be Smith/Winmar and Stanley/Archer for mine.
Talk of poor drafting is tosh, Blind Freddy can see the problem is an overly conservative selection process.
We were minus a tall forward on Friday, so for McQualter and Peake out the ins would be Smith/Winmar and Stanley/Archer for mine.
Talk of poor drafting is tosh, Blind Freddy can see the problem is an overly conservative selection process.
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."