Let me simplify the problem last night...
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Let me simplify the problem last night...
Exhibit A
Last edited by SainterK on Sat 26 Mar 2011 11:14pm, edited 1 time in total.
- borderbarry
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
- Location: Wodonga
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
honestly i got the feel Gamble was a bit nervous about playing against his old side ... some players lift when the come up against their old team but gamble seems a bit too timmid against geelong (from the two games against them) its still early so that timmidness of hitting your old mates hard will fade ... hopefully
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Re: Let me simply the problem last night...
That is comical & re-iterates how stupid our plan last night was.SainterK wrote:Exhibit A
Re: Let me simply the problem last night...
Personally I'd go with selection, not game plan....savatage wrote:That is comical & re-iterates how stupid our plan last night was.SainterK wrote:Exhibit A
Comical how obvious, I agree.
- st_Trav_ofWA
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8886
- Joined: Wed 13 Sep 2006 7:10pm
- Location: Perth
- Contact:
Re: Let me simply the problem last night...
again i dont think Ross Lyon had on the white board "kick it to Roo 4 on 1"savatage wrote:That is comical & re-iterates how stupid our plan last night was.SainterK wrote:Exhibit A
the question i have is if there are four geelong players in the frame where were the other saints players ? where were the crumbers ? Roo will make a contest EVERY time so there should be a crumber there at all times
"The team that wins in the most positions and makes the least amount of mistakes, usually wins the game." -- Allan Jeans
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
http://westernsaints.wordpress.com/
Re: Let me simply the problem last night...
I never said it was Ross Lyon's plan - the point is that we consistently did this - through stupidity or whatever, the result is - it's never going to work.st_Trav_ofWA wrote:again i dont think Ross Lyon had on the white board "kick it to Roo 4 on 1"savatage wrote:That is comical & re-iterates how stupid our plan last night was.SainterK wrote:Exhibit A
the question i have is if there are four geelong players in the frame where were the other saints players ? where were the crumbers ? Roo will make a contest EVERY time so there should be a crumber there at all times
S. Milne should be a much better crumber than he is. He gets his goals on the lead & run most of the time.
Schneider is a smarter crumber most definitely - but we needed another good tall target in the F50 & some fleet footed players that get the ball (ie not McQualter).
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11351
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1344 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Yes, this photograph exemplifies how poor our strategy - or lack there of - is for delivering the ball into our attacking half.
The question also beckons, why aren't small forwards like Milne and Gamble in the frame to lend support?
Hopefully having guys like Schnieder and Kosi back will ease the squeeze (excuse the Mark Latham lingo) on Roo.
The question also beckons, why aren't small forwards like Milne and Gamble in the frame to lend support?
Hopefully having guys like Schnieder and Kosi back will ease the squeeze (excuse the Mark Latham lingo) on Roo.
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5878
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 615 times
- Been thanked: 460 times
- Contact:
We need to develop and play a young fast kid or 2 .. our forward line , pace running ability and ball skills can only improve from last night.
We have nothing to lose .. we have to try a few new things.
There will be many more Riewoldt photos like that all year if we don't alter things... 3 against one and an opposition defender free to pick up the resulting crumbs and rebound away from our slow forwards.
We have nothing to lose .. we have to try a few new things.
There will be many more Riewoldt photos like that all year if we don't alter things... 3 against one and an opposition defender free to pick up the resulting crumbs and rebound away from our slow forwards.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
- QuestionOfAccuracy
- Club Player
- Posts: 610
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 3:00pm
- Contact:
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Thu 25 Dec 2008 12:47pm
Makes me laugh every time I see the name Kosi as the solution to the 3:1 or 4:1 one defense on the captain.
Kosi has proven on many occasions that he isn't the answer to this most difficult of puzzles.
Time we looked at another solution.
Kosi has proven on many occasions that he isn't the answer to this most difficult of puzzles.
Time we looked at another solution.
Leave your ego's in the locker when you start and pick them up again when you retire
- Bernard Shakey
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
- Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
- Has thanked: 126 times
- Been thanked: 137 times
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Re: Let me simply the problem last night...
It's laughable that week in week out nick riewoldt is the only target and must endure 4 or 5 opposition players teaming up on him every week.SainterK wrote:Exhibit A
The coaching department has this glaring problem and do nothing about it.
Nick riewoldt is getting massacred and it's probably shortening his career.
What will our coaching department do? How will they try and create another forward target
What is dead may never die, but rises again harder and stronger.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 553
- Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 7:46pm
- Been thanked: 7 times
Why don't we seriously play Reiwoldt on a wing and construct a forward line without him there? I think this will work. We will then be forced to use the best option and not just one. Reiwoldt will still obviously run down and create an option every now and again but it would be much harder for oppositions to triple team him in this case and we would be less predictable. This has to be tried, because what we are doing at the moment with Reiwoldt is simply not working and never will!
When Harvey played his first game in 1988, I was a 12yo wearing short pants and struggling with my readin', writin' and 'rithmetic in grade eight. Now, I'm a father of three and a retired AFL player. And he's still going. Amazing! - Michael Voss
So why is the ball there then?MCG-Unit wrote:I don't know if it's all that simple.....when there are 3-4 players on Riewoldt - there should be free Saints players running riot on their own
Doesn't happen though
Do they kick it to him anyway, does he call for it, are they are leading to the same place?
Oh and
- Enrico_Misso
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11662
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
- Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
- Has thanked: 315 times
- Been thanked: 720 times
The photo also doesn't show another key failing., namely that this contest would be in a low scoring percentage zone.
Geelong mostly through Scarlett try to "own" the central corridor.
This means that a mid will look up and see congestion in the corridor so will kick it wide.
Time and time again the ball was kicked deep into the pockets or out to the flanks.
So even if Roo had won the three on to one contest he would be kicking from a low percentage region.
So every time we kicked to him in an outnumbered situation it was a double win for Geelong.
Geelong mostly through Scarlett try to "own" the central corridor.
This means that a mid will look up and see congestion in the corridor so will kick it wide.
Time and time again the ball was kicked deep into the pockets or out to the flanks.
So even if Roo had won the three on to one contest he would be kicking from a low percentage region.
So every time we kicked to him in an outnumbered situation it was a double win for Geelong.
The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules.
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
- MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3153
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 564 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
I think he does call for it sometimes. Whether Riewoldt calls for it or not, if he is double or triple teamed, there should be other players on their own, unmarked, surely.SainterK wrote:So why is the ball there then?MCG-Unit wrote:I don't know if it's all that simple.....when there are 3-4 players on Riewoldt - there should be free Saints players running riot on their own
Doesn't happen though
Do they kick it to him anyway, does he call for it, are they are leading to the same place?
Oh and
While I don't like seeing 3-4 defenders on him - I've always wondered what the other unmarked Saints are doing
Unless they're told to zone back and defend..........
I use in all my posts, it's not at you
No Contract, No contact
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Let me simplify the problem last night...
will we never learn?SainterK wrote:
what happened to the idea of using gilbert as a forward?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18636
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1980 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Let me simplify the problem last night...
will we never learn?SainterK wrote:
what happened to the idea of using gilbert as a forward?