As a straight comparison I agree...however I can see Lyon not selecting Demspter, but I can't see him not selecting Baker.SainterK wrote:
You really think it's Raph v Dempster, isn't it more likely Baker v Dempster?
Guess this week's OUTs and INS
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30077
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 709 times
- Been thanked: 1228 times
-
MCG-Unit
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
- Location: Land of the Giants
- Has thanked: 501 times
- Been thanked: 20 times
Your side also has Gamble in and Peake outJunior wrote:Reckon Dempster will play, and play on Steve Johnson.
B: S. Baker, Z. Dawson, J. Blake
H.B: J. Gwilt, S. Fisher, R. Clarke
C: F.Ray L. Hayes, L. Montagna
HF: S. Gilbert, N. Riewoldt, N. Dal Santo
F: S. Milne, D. Archer, R. Gamble
Foll: B. McEvoy, B. Goddard, C.Jones
Int: D.Armitage, S. Dempster, J.Gram
Sub: A.Smith
Which I think makes the following.
In Archer, Smith, Clarke, Armitage
Out Schenider, Gardiner, Eddy and McQualter
I thought they might leave Peake in - not sure who for though
Last edited by MCG-Unit on Thu 24 Mar 2011 2:22pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hold your ground
-
Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Cats are a hardened team.degruch wrote:Not sure that makes him a dead cert though.bigred wrote:Archer will play or they wouldnt have elevated him.
Stanley's an effective ruck/forward option too, with some experience. Not saying Archer won't play, but a tough team for a noobie to front up to on debut.
Stanley might worry them with his height and pace but Archer might impact more with his size, bulk and ferocity at the contest.
-
degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
10 times, eh. Geez, Rhys Stanley's lucky he's even on the list! I've seen Archer kick at goal...he's got a bit of work to do with Mr. Hudson before he's 10 times anyone. Stanley on the HFF, Archer at FF would be a great option though.bob__71 wrote:I think Archer looks 10x the footballer stanley does....but no where near the athlete. But in looking for a FF I personally would take Archer every day of the week.
-
spert
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9026
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 420 times
They cancel each other out!Dr Spaceman wrote:Two McQs???spert wrote:The GF2 proved the backline was pretty sound under pressure, so the problems elsewhere need to be addressed.
I think we need to experiment with the forward line and get a few out of their comfort zones
B: Dempster, Dawson, Blake
H.B: Gwilt, Fisher, Clarke
C: Gram, Hayes, Montagna
HF: Gilbert, Goddard, Gamble
F: Milne, Riewoldt, NDS
Foll: McEvoy, Armo, McQ
Int: McQ ,Archer, Jones
Sub: Smith
Emerg: Baker, Peake, Winmar
I'm not even sure we need one
-
degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
I reckon the 2 of them together will tear Richmond a new one. I reckon RL might go with a more cautious approacjh, but that's just my gut feeling, not a fact.Dr Spaceman wrote:Cats are a hardened team.degruch wrote:Not sure that makes him a dead cert though.bigred wrote:Archer will play or they wouldnt have elevated him.
Stanley's an effective ruck/forward option too, with some experience. Not saying Archer won't play, but a tough team for a noobie to front up to on debut.
Stanley might worry them with his height and pace but Archer might impact more with his size, bulk and ferocity at the contest.