Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
New proble looms on Milne rape case according to the Hun!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Selhurst Saint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1762
- Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004 9:09am
- Location: I do like to be beside the seaside
- Been thanked: 35 times
"...If there has been one recurring theme through this whole shocking mess, it has been the misguided, inflated egos and their ill-judged determination to cling to long-standing old boy friendships. The bad advice that has guided the selfish and culpable James Hird has not only punctuated this saga but symbolised it..."
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
Nope, that would be too exciting. If my name was to match the story of life, it would be more like "aka S**t Happens"!!Helio wrote:AKA "on the run"??meher baba wrote:Gee wiz: I thought that was all ancient history now. Since that happened I've been through two divorces, three changes of career and moved interstate four times!!
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
- Jonathan Swift
- meher baba
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7196
- Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
- Location: Tasmania
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 503 times
The point is that while the media are picking out the Saints for every possible sniff of an infraction no matter how innocuous, what are they NOT reporting?meher baba wrote:While i generally share plugger66's view that too many posters on here believe that the media and the footy world are all conspiring against us, perhaps that is the case here to some extent.
The media aren't picking out St Kilda because of who we are, but because of who we are not.
Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
- GRAMophone
- Club Player
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Mon 02 Jul 2007 4:07pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 11:34pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Spot on, hence the new article about "bad boy Zac", unreal.............GRAMophone wrote:My first thought also was that the timimg of the Milne article is possibly quite orchestrated to reignite the Saints bad boys vibe and deflect from the protected team.
Put the Milne article on the same page as Nixon and effectively increase the bad branding of the Saints![]()
![]()
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2010 11:34pm
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 16 times
Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
You should know; you read and believe.plugger66 wrote:What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.satchmo wrote:You should know; you read and believe.plugger66 wrote:What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Both cases thrown out.plugger66 wrote:Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.satchmo wrote:You should know; you read and believe.plugger66 wrote:What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?
When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Dont know. Cant remember the cops looking into that case though especially as far as a cop trying to stop evidence or conviction. maybe you can tell me. Either way both will have no case to answer eventually.satchmo wrote:Both cases thrown out.plugger66 wrote:Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.satchmo wrote:You should know; you read and believe.plugger66 wrote:What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?
When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
what nice patternsplugger66 wrote:Dont know. Cant remember the cops looking into that case though especially as far as a cop trying to stop evidence or conviction. maybe you can tell me. Either way both will have no case to answer eventually.satchmo wrote:Both cases thrown out.plugger66 wrote:Not even slightly. Just dont choose to think one side is favoured by the law and others arent. Fancy thinking that though.satchmo wrote:You should know; you read and believe.plugger66 wrote:What actually happened? I take it you were there.St Lenny wrote:Yep, picked it in one.Selhurst Saint wrote:Further to this. Am I right in thinking that the two Collingwood players are not going to be charged because the accuser was too drunk and would not make a creditable witness? Even though the third party being a non Collingwood player WAS actually charged?Quixote wrote:satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
Very valid point in bold
Which case is the hs still dragging up, even though it's a lot older?
When was the last time that the hs mentioned the collingwood rape?
![Image](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_iUpoNBZyaBc/R0zVk-1LCZI/AAAAAAAAAg0/9eeT7D6cnaA/s320/compass-blu-265x220.gif)
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- Johnny Member
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4157
- Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Interesting this surfaces again after rumblings that a Pie or two will be outed by the skank...
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- ralphsmith
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2420
- Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
If I recall correctly that's what happened when Beams and McCarthy got themselves in trouble...
Hey. Probably just coincidence....
Hey. Probably just coincidence....
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
f****** gutless and sad.saintspremiers wrote:I hope he is found not guilty again.
I know the righteous ones on here want the truth and justice, but I just want it to go away....
What if it was someone in your family who believed they'd been raped, as a matter of interest? Would you be happy to say "screw truth and justice" and be hoping it would "just go away"?
Sad.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
f****** gutless and sad & hypothetical.AnythingsPossibleSaints wrote:f****** gutless and sad.saintspremiers wrote:I hope he is found not guilty again.
I know the righteous ones on here want the truth and justice, but I just want it to go away....
What if it was someone in your family who believed they'd been raped, as a matter of interest? Would you be happy to say "screw truth and justice" and be hoping it would "just go away"?
Sad.
There was a thorough investigation and no charges were laid. The rest is muckraking by the finest purveyors of the art.
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4888
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 330 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Really? What is sexual misconduct? Never heard of that charge before in my life. It wasn't an AFL investigation it was a police investigation, and he was investigated for rape and had no case to answer in the end. As for the Collingwood allegation. What do you know? I'm tipping you know absolutely nothing other than what you have heard.satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6656
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:24pm
- Location: Hotel Bastardos
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 166 times
- Contact:
Milne wasn't accused of rape, so it wasn't a rape investigation. There was never a suggestion that force was used. Of course if you read the hs you wouldn't have read that.Moods wrote:Really? What is sexual misconduct? Never heard of that charge before in my life. It wasn't an AFL investigation it was a police investigation, and he was investigated for rape and had no case to answer in the end. As for the Collingwood allegation. What do you know? I'm tipping you know absolutely nothing other than what you have heard.satchmo wrote:None of the crap they are dredging up changes the above fact.They prepared a brief of evidence against Milne, but their superior officer decided not to lay charges after advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions that there was no reasonable chance of a conviction.
They weren't going to charge him with rape, they were going to charge him with sexual misconduct, but on the evidence it was clear that they wouldn't get a conviction. The girl got into bed with three other people twice for the purpose of having sex. No evidence is missing, all statements say the pretty much the same thing... She willingly got into bed with them, and no force was used.
So it's completely different to the collingwood rape.
I'm tipping that you need help with your tipping.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
*Allegedly.
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post
Bring back Lucky Burgers, and nobody gets hurt.
You can't un-fry things.
Last Post