johnpeterbudgefanclub wrote:SaintSimmo wrote:haha see the HS always makes an article out of nothing, i'll give them credit for that. It still is yet to be proven true or involving the players themselves.
Just like Beams huh? The good ole HS.
Expect both him and McCarthy to be cleared. Although Beams has been delivered a stern warning - in house.
Well how will they rationalize that down at teh Westpac Centre?
One of the 'participants' has already been charged. Is that enough for them, as long as it's not one of their players?
Does it make a difference which number in the queue you were?
If the victim is too intoxicated to give permission to the first one, then how is she not too intoxicated to give permission to numbers 2,3,4,5,6, etc?
Once again it appears Collingwood will 'punish' unacceptable anti-social behaviour by 'lashing the perpetrators with a damp lettuce leaf.
Personally I find it sickening.
That girl is somebody's daughter adn probably somebody's sister. She deserves to be treated with respect, and not abused in the manner she apparently has been.
WHat it had have been a Collingwood player's sister - would tha make it unacceptable?
When will the knobs who run Collingwood understand that their players need to follow the same rules as the rest of us in Society? They're not absolved from behaving like pack animals, even though they're fawned over by their adoring fans.
Didak all over again, but this time the victim is alive and probably suffering badly from her experiences?
What does a player (especially a good one) have to do to get properly disciplined at Collingwood?
And as for the HS, they only named Beams after Neil Mitchell publicly outed him. They went days without naming him until then.
Maybe we'll see a report on Ch9 News sometime in the middle of next season bringing it all up again?
What will teh headlines scream out?
I know:-
"Saints Sex Scandal"