MRP - Schneider gets 2 week suspension
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
MRP - Schneider gets 2 week suspension
In Summary, 450 points and four-week ban down to 295.31 and two-week ban due to good record and early plea (if accepted, of course). Obviously will then have 95.31 hanging over his head.
Adam Schneider, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against Brent Macaffer, Collingwood, during the third quarter of the 2010 Grand Final Replay, played at the MCG on Saturday October 2, 2010.
In summary, due to the double demerit points for any offence committed in Saturday’s game, he can accept a two-match sanction with an early plea.
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. The Grand Final Replay draws a 100 per cent loading on the base points for the offence, increasing the penalty to 450 demerit points and a four-match sanction. He has a five-year good record, which reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 393.75 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 295.31 points and a two-match sanction.
Other incidents assessed:
Contact between Collingwood’s Travis Cloke and St Kilda’s Zac Dawson from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Due to the inconclusive nature of the available footage, it could not be determined if a reportable incident had occurred. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda’s Lenny Hayes and Collingwood’s Alan Didak from the second quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The panel said contact was made to the upper arm of player Didak. Taking into account all available footage, the contact to the arm was considered below that required to constitute a reportable offence. Hayes then immediately swung his left arm at player Didak, and did not make any contact, but his hand was open at all times and this action was not considered to be a striking motion. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda’s Lenny Hayes and Collingwood’s Dane Swan from the third quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The panel examined all available footage and also received a medical report on player Swan, which stated he had received no injury. Taking into account all the available evidence, it was determined that the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence and no further action was required.
Adam Schneider, St Kilda, has been charged with a Level Three striking offence against Brent Macaffer, Collingwood, during the third quarter of the 2010 Grand Final Replay, played at the MCG on Saturday October 2, 2010.
In summary, due to the double demerit points for any offence committed in Saturday’s game, he can accept a two-match sanction with an early plea.
The incident was assessed as intentional conduct (three points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two points). This is a total of six activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Three offence, drawing 225 demerit points and a two-match sanction. The Grand Final Replay draws a 100 per cent loading on the base points for the offence, increasing the penalty to 450 demerit points and a four-match sanction. He has a five-year good record, which reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 393.75 points and a three-match sanction. An early plea reduces the penalty by 25 per cent to 295.31 points and a two-match sanction.
Other incidents assessed:
Contact between Collingwood’s Travis Cloke and St Kilda’s Zac Dawson from the first quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. Due to the inconclusive nature of the available footage, it could not be determined if a reportable incident had occurred. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda’s Lenny Hayes and Collingwood’s Alan Didak from the second quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The panel said contact was made to the upper arm of player Didak. Taking into account all available footage, the contact to the arm was considered below that required to constitute a reportable offence. Hayes then immediately swung his left arm at player Didak, and did not make any contact, but his hand was open at all times and this action was not considered to be a striking motion. No further action was taken.
Contact between St Kilda’s Lenny Hayes and Collingwood’s Dane Swan from the third quarter of Saturday’s match was assessed. The panel examined all available footage and also received a medical report on player Swan, which stated he had received no injury. Taking into account all the available evidence, it was determined that the force used was below that required to constitute a reportable offence and no further action was required.
Last edited by Liam_G on Mon 04 Oct 2010 3:34pm, edited 1 time in total.
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Come in spinner.plugger66 wrote:So you would have been happier if BJ was found guilty in the first game? And you havent even seen it.Sainterman wrote:MRP provides the cherry on top. Not seen the incident, but out of 2 grand finals this is all they found?
The sooner the MRP is overhauled the better. It is a serious joke!
Nope, would not have been happy with it if BJ had gone, but am surprised out of all that, the 2 grand finals, there is only one charge...
But you know what Plugger, I couldn't actually give a crap in the end...and the last thing I can be bothered doing is discussing it with you...
- Dis Believer
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5089
- Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
- Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
- Has thanked: 258 times
- Been thanked: 272 times
Don't think the job on Grammy in the 2nd quarter was worth a look???plugger66 wrote:So you would have been happier if BJ was found guilty in the first game? And you havent even seen it.Sainterman wrote:MRP provides the cherry on top. Not seen the incident, but out of 2 grand finals this is all they found?
The sooner the MRP is overhauled the better. It is a serious joke!
You bring new meaning to the word Flog..........
You set a new high in low.......... Total ass-clown and complete tool.
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30091
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
You come across as such a nice person. Just one question, do you have a friend in the world or do you look in the mirror for a good conversation?True Believer wrote:Don't think the job on Grammy in the 2nd quarter was worth a look???plugger66 wrote:So you would have been happier if BJ was found guilty in the first game? And you havent even seen it.Sainterman wrote:MRP provides the cherry on top. Not seen the incident, but out of 2 grand finals this is all they found?
The sooner the MRP is overhauled the better. It is a serious joke!
You bring new meaning to the word Flog..........
You set a new high in low.......... Total ass-clown and complete tool.
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Schneider was in blistering form for the second half of this year. He then has a collision with Roo against Richmond which clearly hurt him and was obviously struggling with fitness for the rest of the year.Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
But don't let any of that get in the way of a good story will you!
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- GrumpyOne
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8163
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
- Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne
Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
Was very clear to me, and I still stand by my original comment.
Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
- barks4eva
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10748
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:39pm
- Has thanked: 190 times
- Been thanked: 92 times
IQ43 you're an idiot!Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
Schnieder has been a very good pick up for us!
DO THE MATHS AND THE SQUARES ARE ALL ROOTED.
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
So you are saying that Schneider was injured to the point where he couldn't perform to his optimal level in round 21 - 21/08/2010.IluvHarvey wrote:Schneider was in blistering form for the second half of this year. He then has a collision with Roo against Richmond which clearly hurt him and was obviously struggling with fitness for the rest of the year.Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
But don't let any of that get in the way of a good story will you!
It makes you wonder why he only missed one week before playing finals with such a serious injury.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
That's the story.
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Do you even watch games?Saints43 wrote:So you are saying that Schneider was injured to the point where he couldn't perform to his optimal level in round 21 - 21/08/2010.IluvHarvey wrote:Schneider was in blistering form for the second half of this year. He then has a collision with Roo against Richmond which clearly hurt him and was obviously struggling with fitness for the rest of the year.Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
But don't let any of that get in the way of a good story will you!
It makes you wonder why he only missed one week before playing finals with such a serious injury.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
That's the story.
He couldn't even run after he collided with Roo in round 21.
He had round 22 off and came back in the finals because he is in our best 22.
Watch the last quarter of GF1 and tell me he was bad. He was excellent in that quarter.
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Grand finals are four quarter games.IluvHarvey wrote:Do you even watch games?Saints43 wrote:So you are saying that Schneider was injured to the point where he couldn't perform to his optimal level in round 21 - 21/08/2010.IluvHarvey wrote:Schneider was in blistering form for the second half of this year. He then has a collision with Roo against Richmond which clearly hurt him and was obviously struggling with fitness for the rest of the year.Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
But don't let any of that get in the way of a good story will you!
It makes you wonder why he only missed one week before playing finals with such a serious injury.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
That's the story.
He couldn't even run after he collided with Roo in round 21.
He had round 22 off and came back in the finals because he is in our best 22.
Watch the last quarter of GF1 and tell me he was bad. He was excellent in that quarter.
If I concede he was good in one grand final quarter will you accept he has been ordinary in eleven grand final quarters for St Kilda?
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
And I'm tipping that I've watched more seasons than you've been alive.
- IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Saints43 wrote:
Grand finals are four quarter games.
If I concede he was good in one grand final quarter will you accept he has been ordinary in eleven grand final quarters for St Kilda?
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
And I'm tipping that I've watched more seasons than you've been alive.
Last years GF he was the only Saints player to kick multiple goals. Didn't have a great game but was far from our worst.
And GF2 he had 19 disposals and 4 tackles again servicable but not as bad as you're making out.
Maybe you should've watched some of his games before he got hurt!
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
I watch every game. My issue is with his three year performance and (what I assume is) his fairly significant allocation of our salary cap.IluvHarvey wrote:Saints43 wrote:
Grand finals are four quarter games.
If I concede he was good in one grand final quarter will you accept he has been ordinary in eleven grand final quarters for St Kilda?
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
And I'm tipping that I've watched more seasons than you've been alive.
Last years GF he was the only Saints player to kick multiple goals. Didn't have a great game but was far from our worst.
And GF2 he had 19 disposals and 4 tackles again servicable but not as bad as you're making out.
Maybe you should've watched some of his games before he got hurt!
Don't worry, he's not as culpable as some IMO. (the coaching staff being ultimately responsible)
While collingwood have spread their salary cap evenly across the whole list we have stuck with marquee players and 'role players' - the ordinary cattle.
Malthouse has just won a flag with Cloke at CHF - the hardest and most important position on the field. We have failed to win three grand finals in two years with Riewoldt. And Dal Santo. And Milne. And Schneider. The list of three time non-performers is too long.
RL has a great advantage here. Malthouse has to wait eight years (02,03,10) to confirm that L Davis cannot stand up when the drums are banging. RL has got to see a lot of our players in three GFs in two years.
The 2009 trade period doesn't have to be a mill stone around the clubs neck. While we made a massive error, that error has freed up the money to re-sign our best players. That means we have continuity and the players have trade value.
RL can re-load for 2011.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Are you drunk?Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Clearly, but surely that is incidental.Thinline wrote:Are you drunk?Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Do you have any opinions on whether our top paid players should perform in the matches that mean the most to us?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Wed 14 Feb 2007 7:30am
Oi - you stand next to the bloke with a pair of damn tweezers and see if you can pinch any damn fat around the guys midrift - cos I guarantee you'll pinch f*** all.Saints43 wrote:Here's what it means...IluvHarvey wrote:I don't even get it!GrumpyOne wrote:Stupid comment.Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Schneider hasn't been as fit as he could be for the three years that he has been at St Kilda. The first two years his guts hung over his shorts. The sort of bloke who has to stand up in court and give evidence after having had 27 drinks.
He has played in three grand finals. And been no good in three grand finals.
Sydney had to let him go because of salary cap pressure so he doesn't have to rely on Robert eddy to buy him KFC.
St Kilda gave up pick 26 for him.
In a salary capped competition Adam Schneider is a fair part of the reason that collingwood supporters are enjoying a premiership.
Does that make it any clearer?
If everyone speeds, why haven't you been overtaken?
- Saints43
- Club Player
- Posts: 1826
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:01pm
- Location: L2 A38
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
You keep your personal life to yourself and I'll keep mine to mine.Banger2Plugger wrote:Oi - you stand next to the bloke with a pair of damn tweezers and see if you can pinch any damn fat around the guys midrift - cos I guarantee you'll pinch f*** all.
If you are claiming that Schneider has been in tip-top condition, especially in his first two seasons with St Kilda, then you need to get out more.
He did.
- Mr Magic
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12775
- Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
- Has thanked: 784 times
- Been thanked: 425 times
Don't they generally get paid what their value is to the Club?Saints43 wrote:Clearly, but surely that is incidental.Thinline wrote:Are you drunk?Saints43 wrote:Maybe he can spend those two weeks attempting to get fit. See how that goes.
3 from 3, fat guts Schneider.
Do you have any opinions on whether our top paid players should perform in the matches that mean the most to us?
Obviously Schneider is on what the CLub thinks he is worth - whatever that is?
Do you know how much, I don'. I don't think I've ever seen it made public.
What about BJ?
What about Lenny?
WHat about Roo?
What about Dal,
How about the 100-150k that Zac is getting? SHould he get more/less?
The Club obviously decided that Luke Ball wasn't worth the 500-600 he wanted adn wouldn't budge over the 350k they offered.
Now they're being castigated on here for not offering him enough and showing through his salary offer how much they 'really' wanted him.
You make the statements about his 'large' slary but what are the facts?
Maybe he's earning less than whta he should be on?
And btw, we got him + Dempster for pick 26.
IMO, he's not the reason (sole or major) we lost last Saturday.
I'm not sure why you've taken such a negative view of him, above all others?