How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
ralphsmith
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 17 times

How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008546Post ralphsmith »

I kind of missed it...what did they do that made them so much better than everyone else? In fact i didn't really rate them all year, and thought it inevitable we'd play the cats in the grand. I though it a joke when they drafted Luke Ball it would boost their midfield...Luke Ball...the guy who couldn't kick 20m or keep up with the pace of the game for the saints.

Lets be honest, they could have should have buried us last week. We had no answers to their first quarter goal and attack fest 2 grand finals in a row.

I felt we looked so slow yesterday and the pies were like a wild dog trying to break free of its leash. They were so keen to get to the mark to stop us playing on, they were running to position with immense speed and foresight, the ball was bouncing right, falling right.

They didn't seem to have any fumbly useless hacky players like Mcqualter, Baker, Jones or Eddy, they were full of skillful Farren Ray type equivalents.

They were pumping it forward, instinctively while we were hand balling backwards stupidly, as if we didn't want the ball to go forward. They just push and push forward like mad men, and goals flow.

Their energetic youth and speed seemed unstoppable.

Incredible from the pies.

Where did this improvement come from? And did anyone feel like the pies kind of slipped under our radar completely?


User avatar
LaUrEnCe
Club Player
Posts: 893
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005 9:56pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 1008547Post LaUrEnCe »

It was like midway through the season too


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008554Post plugger66 »

ralphsmith wrote:

They didn't seem to have any fumbly useless hacky players like Mcqualter, Baker, Jones or Eddy, they were full of skillful Farren Ray type equivalents.


Like this part. Very positive.


User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1803
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 312 times

Post: # 1008555Post saintkid »

Who knows what they did to their players behind the scenes in their Arizona trips in the off-season. :)


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1008556Post degruch »

Last week was more indicative of where the Pies are honestly at, IMO. I joked yesterday to a couple Pies supporters that it would be sporting for Collingwood to run backwards for the entire quarter, given our poor luck (can't believe the bounce of the ball, again), lousy disposal and ability to stuff everything we did. Nothing would have stopped them, or made them look any better than they did yesterday...it was the perfect Pie storm.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008558Post bigcarl »

Everyone at their club, from the coach down, has been put under pressure to justify their place.

They've given these kids their chance, knowing full well that ... if they didn't take it ... a veteran was waiting in the wings for his shot at redemption.

Guess what? Their kids took the chance.

They are a wonderful side ... quick, agressive, confident ... but just to put what they have achieved in some sort of context, they haven't played away from the MCG since early July. That has got to help.

Sour grapes from me if you like, but that is damning on the AFL and its pretentions to providing a level playing field.

Try telling that to Fremantle, who had their best season in years and didn't get to play at the MCG once during the regular season.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008563Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:Everyone at their club, from the coach down, has been put under pressure to justify their place.

They've given these kids their chance, knowing full well that ... if they didn't take it ... a veteran was waiting in the wings for his shot at redemption.

Guess what? Their kids took the chance.

They are a wonderful side ... quick, agressive, confident ... but just to put what they have achieved in some sort of context, they haven't played away from the MCG since early July. That has got to help.
Is it better to have lots of games at the G and travel four times but play more top 8 sides than anyone else compared to playing interstate 6 times but playing less top 8 sides. Pretty even IMO so I think the draw had little to do with their improvement.


User avatar
ralphsmith
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2420
Joined: Sat 25 Jul 2009 10:36pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008566Post ralphsmith »

bigcarl wrote:They've given these kids their chance, knowing full well that ... if they didn't take it ... a veteran was waiting in the wings for his shot at redemption.
That's exactly right.

Couldn't quite believe Fraser or Medhurst couldn't get a game at the pies. Some kid had eclipsed them and now has a premiership medallion.

Where did they get these kids? Can we do that?!


User avatar
Beej
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6864
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 3:57pm
Location: Carlton Norf

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008567Post Beej »

bigcarl wrote:Everyone at their club, from the coach down, has been put under pressure to justify their place.

They've given these kids their chance, knowing full well that ... if they didn't take it ... a veteran was waiting in the wings for his shot at redemption.

Guess what? Their kids took the chance.

They are a wonderful side ... quick, agressive, confident ... but just to put what they have achieved in some sort of context, they haven't played away from the MCG since early July. That has got to help.

Sour grapes from me if you like, but that is damning on the AFL and its pretentions to providing a level playing field.

Try telling that to Fremantle, who had their best season in years and didn't get to play at the MCG once during the regular season.
I remember before our QF last year people saying that because we hadn't played much at the MCG we would be in trouble against Collingwood.

We were too good for the Pies at the MCG that day.

This year we had played three straight at the MCG before the replay - that's more than enough games to become accustomed to a ground.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Re: How did collingwood improve so much, so quickly?

Post: # 1008568Post bigcarl »

plugger66 wrote:Is it better to have lots of games at the G and travel four times but play more top 8 sides than anyone else compared to playing interstate 6 times but playing less top 8 sides. Pretty even IMO so I think the draw had little to do with their improvement.
I think that to play the last 12 matches at your home ground is a definite advantage ... if only we had that luxury.

But it doesn't surprise me to hear you again defending the AFL.

All that said, I take nothing away from the Magpies. They are a very good side as you and I have continually pointed out during the season.


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1008573Post gringo »

Saints footy takes the variables out of the game. Pies footy relies on fortune favours the brave.

Get it move it forward as fast as you can. Back your shots from any player and defend it if it comes back out. Collingwoods poor conversion is because they take 50 meter kicks on angles and know that their forward pressure will restrict the rebound. They then also have a zone that doesn't chase individuals. Just pure zone style defence and if the player in your area comes past you pressure intensely. The mids are told to take a shot if in range.

Saints will chip it around until a best chance is made then shoot. We need to look at playing their game or come up with a strategy other than control it at a slow pace. I think the pies didn't show their hand too early as a strategy, once teams work it out they can counter it. It will be harder next year.

Malthouse has a few strategies that are designed to push the boundaries of spirit of the game too.
Tunnelling, hitting the body hard in every contest, interchange exchanges to confound tags etc. kick in cut off by interchange etc.

We can learn from him, his pressure from being put on death row got him desperate, made him look at the game different. We need to out c%$# the c%$#s.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Post: # 1008578Post bigcarl »

gringo wrote:We need to look at playing their game or come up with a strategy other than control it at a slow pace.
Exactly right. We need to move the ball quicker and attack more. Bold, adventurous, risk-taking football.

It might start with defence, but it has to end in goals.

Ross's insistence on defence is admirable and and I'm not saying abandon that ... just make sure we can regularly kick winning scores.

Get the balance right between stopping and creating. Too often we err on the negative side (IMO).


User avatar
Beej
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6864
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 3:57pm
Location: Carlton Norf

Post: # 1008585Post Beej »

The genius of Collingwood playing the boundary line.

They take risks, but minimise those risks by playing along the boundary line.

When they lose the footy it makes it difficult for teams to get it back in the corridor. Or they easily usher the ball out of play and setup again.

It's quick, cavalier footy without the dangers of playing through the corridor.


User avatar
sRaf
Club Player
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat 29 May 2010 6:49pm
Contact:

Post: # 1008586Post sRaf »

I have not seen a team play with so much confidence in a looong time. They try to take on any opponent whenever given the opportunity and they normally come out on top. Kind of like the Saints of '04 ;)

A young team and a bit of confidence can go a long way, as highlighted not only by Collingwood, but Richmond and Melbourne too over the course of the year.

Hawthorn's another example of a young side which played with an enormous amount of self belief. They also showed how quickly it can turn around once that belief is lost, but I can't see that happening to Collingwood. They appear to be a more mature outfit with a great coaching staff behind the scene. Love 'em or hate 'em, you cannot deny that the players share a bond not too many clubs can brag about.


User avatar
mad saint guy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7077
Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 366 times

Post: # 1008594Post mad saint guy »

Lockyer, Fraser, Medhurst, Davis, Presti and O'Bree were forced out of the side by Sidebottom, Brown, Reid, Goldsack, Macaffer and Beams. When they recruited experience they got their number one ruckman and a midfielder with the qualities they were lacking.

We needed to have McQualter, Eddy, Koschitzke, Dempster, Baker and Jones forced out by Armitage, Smith, Stanley, Miles, Geary, Simpkin and Lynch. We went and recruited a player with serious mental issues who gets himself sacked before he plays a game and Brett Peake, who just isn't a particularly good player.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18635
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1979 times
Been thanked: 865 times

Post: # 1008595Post bigcarl »

sRaf wrote:They try to take on any opponent whenever given the opportunity and they normally come out on top. Kind of like the Saints of '04 ;)
I was thinking the same thing.

We got on a bit of a roll with eight of our first 10 games at our home ground.

Some kids came of age, adding to some great seasoned players like Banger, Gehrig, Max, Hamill etc. Didn't equate to a premiership for us, but that's life.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1008598Post degruch »

Beej wrote:The genius of Collingwood playing the boundary line.
Which plays right into our hands typically, hence a few thumpings from us in recent times. They played very well yesterday, we played exceedingly poorly, hence the difference.


User avatar
Beej
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6864
Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 3:57pm
Location: Carlton Norf

Post: # 1008605Post Beej »

degruch wrote:
Beej wrote:The genius of Collingwood playing the boundary line.
Which plays right into our hands typically, hence a few thumpings from us in recent times. They played very well yesterday, we played exceedingly poorly, hence the difference.
The thumpings were handed out last year to be fair. They're obviously much improved since.

This year you could say that if it weren't for their poor kicking, they would have beaten us all four times.


oh when
Club Player
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat 26 Jul 2008 8:57pm

BEING BEATEN BY US IN ROUND 3

Post: # 1008609Post oh when »

After we beat them in round 3 - Malthouse said they needed to work on tackling and putting pressure on the player with the ball and this is what they did and improved on.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1008612Post degruch »

Beej wrote:
degruch wrote:
Beej wrote:The genius of Collingwood playing the boundary line.
Which plays right into our hands typically, hence a few thumpings from us in recent times. They played very well yesterday, we played exceedingly poorly, hence the difference.
The thumpings were handed out last year to be fair. They're obviously much improved since.

This year you could say that if it weren't for their poor kicking, they would have beaten us all four times.
Yeah, that's their excuse usually...the fact is they wilt under our pressure, the same way we did yesterday. I'm not about to look at the scoreline and start trotting out 'if we'd kicked straight' as an excuse (I'm not a Pies supporter for a start). We successfully put ourselves under pressure with poor disposal, then finished it off by panicking in front of goal.


User avatar
dcstkfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4584
Joined: Mon 12 Jun 2006 9:37pm
Location: St Kilda

Post: # 1008620Post dcstkfc »

An absolutely outstanding effort from Malthouse and the football department.

They have re-built the list whilst still making finals series.

Good recruiting, backing in your kids, excellent game plan, just a credit to them.

They've made the finals 5 years straight and loook like they could make it for another 5. Only 9 players who played yesterday were in the 07 prelim team- a remarkable statistic.

The fact that their side did not contain one of Buckley, Licuria, Clement, Burns, Rocca, Wakelin, O'Bree, Prestigiacomo, Davis, Lockyer, Fraser or Medhurst speaks incredible volumes for their recruiting.

Finally they hit the jackpot by tanking for one year and getting Pendlebury and Thomas- which has worked out wonderfully.


STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.

‎''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 19095
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1603 times
Been thanked: 2018 times

Post: # 1008760Post SaintPav »

They also took a short term hit in 08 when they suspended Didak and Shaw who missed the finals.

Pity they had to have their massive year of improvement this year. We would have beaten anyone else. Last year we faced Geelong on the rebound who peaked during finals and this year we went up against a hugely improved team with a groundbreaking game plan which just came out of the blue.

All the talk about a dynsaty and them taking it out next year means that they won't.

I hate them but I respect them.
Last edited by SaintPav on Sun 03 Oct 2010 9:16pm, edited 2 times in total.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
SaintWal
Club Player
Posts: 967
Joined: Fri 26 May 2006 9:15pm

Post: # 1008772Post SaintWal »

It really is very simple.

1) Do not put any sort of tag in the centre of the ground. All our mids other than Lenny were intent on minimising the damage of their mids. They back themselves to win the ball! The genious of Malthouse is to roll back to yester year strategy in the middle of the ground.
2) Do not over commit to the contest. It looks great when a filth player was tackled by 2 or 3 of our players but where were their opponents. Outside the huddle in case the ball spilled. How many times was the ball richocheted away to a loose Filth player.
3) Use the tactic of the opposition to your advantage. The full press of the Saints was matched by only a half forward press of the opposition. Result, Saints win ball in congestion and run and spread forward. Easy pick off for up to 5 Pies lined up across the centre line. Result, Quickly fed back in to a scrambling defence caught off guard by a quick turn around.


User avatar
dcstkfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4584
Joined: Mon 12 Jun 2006 9:37pm
Location: St Kilda

Post: # 1008773Post dcstkfc »

SaintWal wrote:It really is very simple.

1) Do not put any sort of tag in the centre of the ground. All our mids other than Lenny were intent on minimising the damage of their mids. They back themselves to win the ball! The genious of Malthouse is to roll back to yester year strategy in the middle of the ground.
2) Do not over commit to the contest. It looks great when a filth player was tackled by 2 or 3 of our players but where were their opponents. Outside the huddle in case the ball spilled. How many times was the ball richocheted away to a loose Filth player.
3) Use the tactic of the opposition to your advantage. The full press of the Saints was matched by only a half forward press of the opposition. Result, Saints win ball in congestion and run and spread forward. Easy pick off for up to 5 Pies lined up across the centre line. Result, Quickly fed back in to a scrambling defence caught off guard by a quick turn around.
Amazing analysis.
Well done.


STRENGTH THROUGH LOYALTY.

‎''I still get really excited, and I've got the '66 thing up on the wall in a frame … You look at it and think: one day, we want to achieve that.''- Arryn Siposs
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1008787Post gringo »

Our game plan won earlier in the year because we push their forward line players wide and along way out with our zone. It means the opposition shoots from a low percentage position.

Collingwood has simply adjusted the amount of pressure they put back on the ball coming out again. They were having 3 behinds before kicking a goal all without it leaving the 50 this year. Low percentage, brave attacking footy.

It freaks the saints out because it isn't what is supposed top happen. It can occasionally fail, but when it comes off it demoralises the opposition.


Post Reply