Laughable.maverick wrote: Anyone thought of Tommy Walsh?
I mean... you can't be serious?
Possible team changes
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
I know we've moved on from Armo in this thread, but I have to say I would not be supprised if he left at the end of this year.
He's got a lot of potential, is a high draft pick, and has shown an ability to be a good clearance player, a great tackler and a goal kicking mid.
He has never been given the opportunity by Ross to cement a spot in the line up, he seems to get a run every now and then for 1 or 2 games and then dropped again.
I really hope we can keep him and that Ross just plays the bloke next year, just give him a big hitout, 10 games minimum to show what he's about.
How much did it help McEvoy's developement having that stretch of 10 or so games last year? And how much has he come alone since being given a fair dinkum chance this year?
He (McEvoy) was also a first round draft pick and has shown what he can do. Armo has shown what he can do, but for some reason hasn't been given the chance to do it!
He's got a lot of potential, is a high draft pick, and has shown an ability to be a good clearance player, a great tackler and a goal kicking mid.
He has never been given the opportunity by Ross to cement a spot in the line up, he seems to get a run every now and then for 1 or 2 games and then dropped again.
I really hope we can keep him and that Ross just plays the bloke next year, just give him a big hitout, 10 games minimum to show what he's about.
How much did it help McEvoy's developement having that stretch of 10 or so games last year? And how much has he come alone since being given a fair dinkum chance this year?
He (McEvoy) was also a first round draft pick and has shown what he can do. Armo has shown what he can do, but for some reason hasn't been given the chance to do it!
-
Toy Saint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Stanley for Gardiner. Kosi into the ruck and Stanley as quick tall forward. Will stretch Magpie backline.
Steven for Eddy. Steven can kick a goal, and helps Lenny extracting the ball, as well as provide extra midfield rotation.
If Gram is as fit as he was last Saturday, sorry but bring back Nick Heyne. He's got a hard body and good pace.
Steven for Eddy. Steven can kick a goal, and helps Lenny extracting the ball, as well as provide extra midfield rotation.
If Gram is as fit as he was last Saturday, sorry but bring back Nick Heyne. He's got a hard body and good pace.
Actually, Ross mentioned Steven tonight, something along the lines of 'he's up and about again'
I honestly think Ross will lean towards more runners, and we may not see McEvoy in
Kosi was great in the ruck, and FC pointed out very well tonight, that we struggled to keep our ball inside 50 before he moved in there. Not sure Ben would give any more mobility than Kosi.
I am actually predicting
Kosi/Blake in the ruck
Gilbert to remain forward (our backline seem to handle this move forward)
Out Gardiner
In Geary
I honestly think Ross will lean towards more runners, and we may not see McEvoy in
Kosi was great in the ruck, and FC pointed out very well tonight, that we struggled to keep our ball inside 50 before he moved in there. Not sure Ben would give any more mobility than Kosi.
I am actually predicting
Kosi/Blake in the ruck
Gilbert to remain forward (our backline seem to handle this move forward)
Out Gardiner
In Geary
If one week ago you had suggested that Ross would be going into a GF with no fulltime ruckman when he always plays two I would have thought you are crazy.SainterK wrote:Actually, Ross mentioned Steven tonight, something along the lines of 'he's up and about again'
I honestly think Ross will lean towards more runners, and we may not see McEvoy in
Kosi was great in the ruck, and FC pointed out very well tonight, that we struggled to keep our ball inside 50 before he moved in there. Not sure Ben would give any more mobility than Kosi.
I am actually predicting
Kosi/Blake in the ruck
Gilbert to remain forward (our backline seem to handle this move forward)
Out Gardiner
In Geary
Now I'm starting to think that maybe you are right.
Crazy huh, he may bring in Ben, but I think he will at least consider the above#1GILL wrote:If one week ago you had suggested that Ross would be going into a GF with no fulltime ruckman when he always plays two I would have thought you are crazy.SainterK wrote:Actually, Ross mentioned Steven tonight, something along the lines of 'he's up and about again'
I honestly think Ross will lean towards more runners, and we may not see McEvoy in
Kosi was great in the ruck, and FC pointed out very well tonight, that we struggled to keep our ball inside 50 before he moved in there. Not sure Ben would give any more mobility than Kosi.
I am actually predicting
Kosi/Blake in the ruck
Gilbert to remain forward (our backline seem to handle this move forward)
Out Gardiner
In Geary
Now I'm starting to think that maybe you are right.
Horses for Courses
possible team changes
in Miles and A Smith
out Dal Santo and Gram
pace pace pace and Dal and Gram didn't look right
out Dal Santo and Gram
pace pace pace and Dal and Gram didn't look right
trevor barker
-
Thinline
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: possible team changes
Pace means bugger all if you don't win the ball.JABBER wrote:in Miles and A Smith
out Dal Santo and Gram
pace pace pace and Dal and Gram didn't look right
Out: Gardiner and possibly Eddy, Gram if injured.
In: McEvoy and possibly Geary, Miles is my smokie for Gram.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
possible changes for
Thinline you wrote Miles cound'nt win the ball but had him as a likely replacement if gram is injured or did you mean my favioutte in A Smith
trevor barker
-
Thinline
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: possible changes for
No. I meant Miles.JABBER wrote:Thinline you wrote Miles cound'nt win the ball but had him as a likely replacement if gram is injured or did you mean my favioutte in A Smith
I was referring to McEvoy re ball winning.
You seemed to ignore the need for a ruckman.
"The inches we need are everywhere around us. They're in every break in the game. Every minute, every second. On this team we fight for that inch. On this team we tear ourselves and everyone around us to pieces for that inch. We claw with our fingernails for that inch. Because we know when we add up all those inches that's gonna make the f***in' difference between winning and losing! Between living and dying!'
-
IluvHarvey
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Fri 06 Jun 2008 4:51pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
I don't really understand this comment. Yes Eddy looked overawed at the occasion, but surely he is better for playing. Who do we replace him with Armo? He never has played in a GF and could possibly be overawed as well. Geary or Steven? they never have played in a final let alone a Grand Final. I honestly believe that if Eddy stays in we will see a completely different game from him.MC Gusto wrote:
eddy must go out for mine too. was waaaaay out of his depth and really felt the pressure.
"It only ends once. Anything that happens before that is just progress."
-
degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
I agree re: Eddy, he's capable, and he has a rare chance to attone. Replacing a noobie with a noobie does not present an immediate benefit to me, unless it's to suit a specific gameplan.IluvHarvey wrote:I don't really understand this comment. Yes Eddy looked overawed at the occasion, but surely he is better for playing. Who do we replace him with Armo? He never has played in a GF and could possibly be overawed as well. Geary or Steven? they never have played in a final let alone a Grand Final. I honestly believe that if Eddy stays in we will see a completely different game from him.MC Gusto wrote:
eddy must go out for mine too. was waaaaay out of his depth and really felt the pressure.
-
longtimesaint
- Club Player
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
- Location: Mentone
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 263 times
-
saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30089
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1233 times
-
samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Contact:
There's no autos ... we did well in the ruck with Blake and Kosi and McEvoy is not a tap ruckman that is going to make the difference.
.. we may need to bring in Geary and Miles for Eddy and Gardiner ?
The plan may be to beat them on the ground... and stop their rebounding and quick half back line (Maxwell, Thomas and Shaw) which had 70 possessions.
.. we may need to bring in Geary and Miles for Eddy and Gardiner ?
The plan may be to beat them on the ground... and stop their rebounding and quick half back line (Maxwell, Thomas and Shaw) which had 70 possessions.
Last edited by samoht on Tue 28 Sep 2010 4:09pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Still say big mac most likely but if you could guarantee that King would get through the GF without going down like Gardy, he would be a walk up start.
Macs still not a great ruckman but adds something around the ground. Geary is the only one I could seriously see coming in though of the rest.
Be patient with Armo, he is a long term replacement for Lenny, he had his injury problems this season and will get more time next year IMO. I think they will manage Lenny's body in the next couple of years to get him through with a few more benchings.
Jack Steven is another that at a club a bit further down the ladder would see a bit more game time. It's a shame if the club isn't communicating this to the players waiting for a spot.
Macs still not a great ruckman but adds something around the ground. Geary is the only one I could seriously see coming in though of the rest.
Be patient with Armo, he is a long term replacement for Lenny, he had his injury problems this season and will get more time next year IMO. I think they will manage Lenny's body in the next couple of years to get him through with a few more benchings.
Jack Steven is another that at a club a bit further down the ladder would see a bit more game time. It's a shame if the club isn't communicating this to the players waiting for a spot.
-
Dr Spaceman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14102
- Joined: Thu 24 Sep 2009 11:07pm
- Location: Newtown Institute of Saintology
- Has thanked: 104 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
Nah, would go for any of the other options before I went for Kingy.gringo wrote:Still say big mac most likely but if you could guarantee that King would get through the GF without going down like Gardy, he would be a walk up start.
Macs still not a great ruckman but adds something around the ground. Geary is the only one I could seriously see coming in though of the rest.
Be patient with Armo, he is a long term replacement for Lenny, he had his injury problems this season and will get more time next year IMO. I think they will manage Lenny's body in the next couple of years to get him through with a few more benchings.
Jack Steven is another that at a club a bit further down the ladder would see a bit more game time. It's a shame if the club isn't communicating this to the players waiting for a spot.
Don't get me wrong, he's a great bloke etc.
But really, he's a slow aging ruckman who has played little this year and who poses no threat as a forward. We can't seriously be looking at bringing a small in to replace Gardi on one hand and replacing him with King on the other.
If a ruck comes in it has to be Ben.
-
samoht
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5820
- Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
- Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
- Has thanked: 598 times
- Been thanked: 447 times
- Contact:
But what if nothing goes wrong with Kosi and Blake - who are doing just fine in the ruck and we have an extra plodder when we could have done with another ground level player ?Kris1 wrote:If McEvoy doesn't play and something happens to Kosi or Blake we would be in trouble I would have thought. Can't imagine Ross taking that risk after what happened to Gards?
We have a few sore ground level players that may appreciate the extra rotations and also the help the extra ground level player would provide - with chase and pressure.