Eastern wrote:It is almost an hour. If they don't know which boxes to tick, how did they find him guilty? !!

Maybe they're trying to find a way to give him 'life'?

sainter58 wrote:i posted it earlier. I saw what happened and he is guilty. You can all be judges but did any of you see the incident.


I DID

What you posted you saw doesn't apparently match what the AFL Freo evidence was.

How do you explain that difference?

Krikkett wrote:Who has said that there isn't video?


The AFL has stationary camera's with a wide view for umpire training...I'd suggest they picked up the incident.

Well if they did they didn't produce it as evidence tonight.

And you would think if they had photographic evidence they would produce it.

On what evidence ? well that's the thing, its Fremantles word against ours and of course the AFL EVERY SINGLE TIME will favour the Fockers. The umpire victory, siren gate and now this farmer off the ball bullshtye. At least this time we got the 4 POINTS Freo might launch a case saying that since Ba...

****Breaking News****

Still photos tendered by teh Saints prove that Freo Trainers claim of where the footy was is incorrect.

First he didn't see the contact
Now he doesn't know where the footy is.

I hope he's getting good recompense from Freo because he is starting to look like a complete idiot.

well they were both high contact and they were both forceful so tell me why there is a huge difference milnedog Can you 'prove' Farmer didn't run into Baker? sorry mr.magic i was referring to the johnso and rowe cases, have a look on page 1 of this thread to see what im talking about My apologies :)

fonz_#15 wrote:well they were both high contact and they were both forceful so tell me why there is a huge difference milnedog

Can you 'prove' Farmer didn't run into Baker?

SO, is Notting going out with Whitnall's sister-in-law?

From where i was sitting, the game was very close from where i normally sit on level 3. Look there could of been a clash of heads and bakes lifted his elbow up to protect him but it looked like bakes elbow hit Farmer in the face. The two players where slightly on an angle to where we where sitting....

Do the crime, Do the time. I was on level 2 in the medallion stand, at the front watching these two players when Baker elbowed Farmer in the face. I saw it and several others around me saw it also. He is guilty of striking, i'm hoping nothing happens but lets face it. He will get 4 weeks minimum. R...

I sincerely hope that the Club has emplotyed David Grace QC to handle the case tonight. He has a 100% winning record at the Tribunal and for those who don't know who he is, he handled the following cases:- for Fremantle against Saints in Sirengate For Selwood against Fremantle in the 'sledging' case...

Just listening to Scott Burns on SEN (Doran's show) and the difference between him and FIGJAM is unbelievable. He sounds honest, forthright, articulate and level-headed. He surely must be an aberation - no Filth player should sound so sensible? His take on Bakes/Farmer How can the Tribunal even take...

Caro tried to stich Bakes up last night.."if he did it he has to go" Was hounded down by Duck (OMG I cant believe Im siding with him) for hanging hium with no evidence USC at her un-informed beat up best :roll: indeed, exactly what I was thinking. I reckon Caro has the hots for Duck.........

What is Bakes alleged to have done?
If the Freo Official claims he saw Bakes strike/punch Farmer then the charge would be 'striking' and not 'rough conduct'.

So what is alleged?

I always understood a 'kinghit' was a blow delivered from behind the unsuspecting victim. It doesn't necessarily have to hit the back of the head - it could be a roundarm from behind that hits the jaw.

He must have been watching CSI Fremantle today to come to that conclusion. After all their "experts" declared that the only way Farmer could have sustained that injury was becuase of some form of illegal action.....would very much like to know how that conclusion was reached. They called ...

No his Lordship FIGJAM saw it and knows what happened - it was a 'kighit' by Baker.

Spot on BendigoBob They must have got some sms messages during the ad break because when they came back from it, FGIJAM tried to clarify what he had said. Chook may have only heard the second part and not the first? I hope Bakes heard it and sues the blood smearing d!ckhead. :evil: :evil: :twisted:...

And FIGJAM launches the 'Filth response' by saying the following:- Rowe (Brions) contact was worse than 'Johnnos' so is amazed he didn't get the same or more Bakers incident is much worse - kinghit behind play and should get 3 times as much as 'Johnno'. NOt a 'if he did anything' about Baker - just...

And FIGJAM launches the 'Filth response' by saying the following:- Rowe (Brions) contact was worse than 'Johnnos' so is amazed he didn't get the same or more Bakers incident is much worse - kinghit behind play and should get 3 times as much as 'Johnno'. NOt a 'if he did anything' about Baker - just ...

Would they risk suspect hammys' on the hard Telstra Dome surface?

Do they need the win to secure a top 2 finish?

Dan Warna wrote:however live from england has declared him guilty and deserving of 3 to 4 matches.

just wanted to feel a bit more Aussie I guess.

But I believe that Stevie Wonder had an unobstructed view of it and concurs with Clive,

saintsRrising wrote:

Mr Magic wrote:I didn't say Freo was right. I just said 'here they go again'

!

MR Magic my post was not havinga go at you....only Freo...

All good

I didn't say Freo was right. I just said 'here they go again'

This is the Freo modus operandi. Neer let the truth or rules get in the way of our desired outcome. And the best way to get that outcome is to whinge!

joffaboy wrote:Well, I would take MM view over widereceiver then.

Thanks MM for the other view.

Always a pleasure joffaboy

It's just another case of 2 people hearing the same thing and getting diametrically opposite impressions.