stinger wrote:suck sh!t riccardo....

obviously you're one of those John Howard voting right wing homophobes, rumpy

meher baba wrote: At least B4E has the excuse of being half crazy

only half crazy, you're too kind, once again I suspect you only know half the story

meher, you can lead a horse to water >

see above post

St. Luke wrote:We wouldn't be the club we are today without the involvement of GT -

Yeah, that's entirely my point

I think many of you should kiss his arse!

You would need to book way ahead obviously

To me, all the claims that GT stuffed up the list are just a load of claptrap. It was Bevo who made the decisions anyway (ask Bevo: and why would he lie given that they are being so heavily criticised nowadays and GT would be a great scapegoat). All the decisions made - except perhaps Fergus Watts ...

rodgerfox wrote:
What's a pissant?

here's a pic of one, just for you dodgy

So typical that the drinker's of the poisoned cordial who leave their sneekers by the bed still after this parasitical, slimeball pissant takes legal action against the football club still come on and defend this oversized pig, money grubbing, megalomaniac maestro and svengali, snake oil salesman as...

In March ( 2006), someone closely affiliated with the club, and who I know, was lunching with (current St.Kilda player), who told him that GT had lost the support of the leadership group and others. The reason given was that it was because he was clueless when it came to coaching. No tactics, just ...

Richmond finished the year quite well. GT addressed the playing group and opened fire at the senior players before they played Geelong. It seemed to coincide directly with their very competitive last month of footy. Seems GT still has it. Perhaps we could get him in next year as a consultant to add...

Brilliant post - sums it up for me also. The interesting thing about Thomas is the timing...it indicates he also has dibs on getting involved down track again in the club in some fashion.......which would be a disgrace if that occured.........hes surely just giving the little Board challenge a help...

quite untrue about the GT haters always bringing him up. precisely correct me if I'm wrong but didn't Thomas launch legal proceedings today, that's this very day, you know Thursday against the football club, you know the one he says he loves and would never do anything to hurt, trying to claim $270...

I think Thomas is infact sticking to his word and doing everything he can for the club. . yeah righto dodgy :roll: Obviously lining his own pockets is not his primary motivation and he's simply sticking true to his word that he loves the club and would never do anything to hurt the club and by taki...

guys please keep this thread on topic

Thomas is a filthy, lying rodent a John Howard voting pissant and a money grubbing arsewipe

now stay on topic

Did this fact, like most of your others, come from your beloved 'Howard-loving' Herald Sun???? For the suburban anarchist from the leafy suburbs you apparently are, you seem to be quite a Murdochophile ... I don't buy or read the herald sun numbnut, and I wouldn't even buy a copy if tey had a five ...

>>>JeffDunne wrote: >>>What part of "allegedly" don't you understand Andrew? But b4e knows everything about Thomas - including how he votes ... and feels free to post this personal and private information on a public forum Ironic (and some would say hypocritical) considering the outbursts...

JeffDunne wrote:What part of "allegedly" don't you understand Andrew?

What part of

signed a statutory declaration while he was still at the club which stated he had taken all the annual leave he was owed.

doesn't Thomas understand?

and I thought this was another thread about Grant Thomas

[but if he is owed the money he is entitled to get it. The two-part writ, which St Kilda must respond to within 28 days, included a $100,000 demand Thomas claimed was promised to him upon his sacking on the condition that he did not criticise the club or individuals at the club. Thomas has claimed ...

This money grubbing, howard voting scum wants to sue the club for $270,000 which includes over $160,000 in annual leave and holiday pay perleeeeezzzzzze This grub already fleeced the club of 2.5 million dollars, as if $500,000 a year over five years wasn't enough for this untried, unproven megaloman...

The decline that was evident in 2006 continued on into 2007 and unless something is done to fix our RECRUITING , the real reason behind our below par performances, all the other nonsense that so many on here distract themselves with is about as relevant as a dildo in a nunnery. Better recruiting wo...

'always tomorrow' - Nice to see you back again - a new laptop or did you get the other fixed :lol: :wink: yeah, if yesterday's man "always tomorrow" had of not stuffed up our recruiting for five years in the recent past, we might not NOW be behind the eight ball, going forward "alway...

I head Silvagni say this, and I also heard Lyon allude to it several times towards the end of the year as our season was slowly dying. If I were to judge us on the 2nd half of the year, we failed horribly. If I were to judge us on the first half, we performed better in my opinion. The first half of...

Fox wanted us merged with carlton, so if he's got anything to do with it, then they should **** off now

Dan Warna wrote:1. smashed his lap top when collingwood won.

.

You can tell him to relax, Adelaide won, so all that was for nothing

Delist six players Blake, time to exit him out Birss, runs around like an anaethetized ostrich Raymond, nobody loves Raymond Voss, too slow, yesterday's news Howard, getting rid of Howard in 2007 seems to be the order of the day McQualter, might get us a third round selection I'd keep Brooks, but if...