True Blue Sainter wrote:Why don't we recruit Tom Lynch just so we can have two of them?

or a straight swap of them

Cairnsman wrote:Charlie Dixon anyone??

No chance unless we give up goddard imo

PJ wrote:

Gram and a pick?

Depends on who

Think we may be able to send gram and a second rounder back to his old team Brissie for Mitch Clark. (Especially with Vossy at the helm )

The cost may have to involve a trade with someone on the list that has cache. I can't see anyone that other teams want that we could give up without being significantly weakened. Non negotiables with cache Roo, Lenny, BJ, Dal, Monty, Fish, Jimmy, Armo, Steven, Ben Middle tier - probably not enough ...

Armoooo wrote:McIntosh for a 3rd round pick sounds Alrigt to me. there is no way he'll ever get a game ahead of Goldstein.

I think he'll be up for free agency so we could get him for nothing.

We wont be challenging for a number of years so dont bother. Nice positive thinking :roll: I see it how it is, might be hard for many supporters to see but we are done with this group. So you think a team that has played in three grand finals in the last one and a half years has no chance? Yeah tha...

PJ wrote:

We could recruit Mitch Clark or Hamish Mcintosh as first ruck?

An attempt to get another ruckman is inevitable IMO but unless we can score one through free agency I don't think Ross's cupboard has much in it.

Mcintosh will be eligible come trade time.

clarky449 wrote:

Tiprat44 wrote:

clarky449 wrote:We wont be challenging for a number of years so dont bother.

Nice positive thinking

I see it how it is, might be hard for many supporters to see but we are done with this group.

So you think a team that has played in three grand finals in the last one and a half years has no chance?

Ben is best suited as a tall forward/ 2nd ruck at present. If we keep using him as the 1st ruck we're not going to improve our clearance work. Ideally Gardy can make it back in the 1st ruck position soon - I'd really like to see him talked into continuing into 2012 while our ruck stocks are low. We...

Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow. I didn't think Siposs was that tall? 18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now. Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him. Have you seen them standing...

Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow. I didn't think Siposs was that tall? 18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now. Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him. Have you seen them standing...

Taylor Walker. Great, another recruit with an attitude problem. Pffffft. I really liked the "no dickheads" policy we used to spruik pre-Lovett. Maybe getting beaten by dickheads in a Grand Final has caused some people to lose their enthusiasm for that policy. I think Walker's only got an ...

Armoooo wrote:Taylor Walker.

Agree

clarky449 wrote:We wont be challenging for a number of years so dont bother.

Nice positive thinking

Bernard Shakey wrote:

Tiprat44 wrote:

Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.

I didn't think Siposs was that tall?

18 year old still growing listed at 188cm last year, probably 192cm now.

Isn't Riewoldt 193? Because Sippos looks more than 1cm shorter than him.

Bernard Shakey wrote:Sippos and Johnson look most likely. Come down to Sandy and see for yourselves tomorrow.

I didn't think Siposs was that tall?

I think we need someone like Taylor Walker that has talent.

Oh and first post