Kirkwood lied to get the case up...IF he had not lied it would not have been put up to be considered. Fre then have Farmer trot outa second lie..one which contradicted his earlier evidence. From what they both said...and what the Tribunal believed......Freo we can assume just cooked upa story to get...

In contrast Farmer said he standing watching the play when he felt someone make contact 'to the right hand side of his face.' But he was unable to tell the tribunal who had made contact with him. "Basically I was watching the play and the next thing I remember contact was made to my face and t...

I don't know if they have made it already...probaly have...but what I would like to see is:

BAKER

or

DO IT
FOR
BAKER

Farmer should GO..it was obviously a pre-mediated lie to try and imply that he had been hit....rather than that he had run into baker.

i posted it earlier. I saw what happened and he is guilty. You can all be judges but did any of you see the incident. I DID Well the Tribunal believed Bakes and Nixon....that the contact was Farmer running into Baker...but found that Baker was reckless for stopping. That is the version I have heard...

he gave himself up? you cant be serious. ohh bakes i knew you were dumb, but honestly i didnt think you were thatttt dumb!! what he said shouldnt even make him guilty though, it's not his fault farmer decided to keep running. 7 weeks for stopping, you've got to be kidding. but wait, it is st kilda ...

He told the Panel tonight that Baker was NOT in front of him.

Panel found that Baker was.

So will Farmer be fined for telling a lie to the Tribunal???

Another caller stating that Farmer ran into Baker....

Nixon confirmed that Farmer's face went into Baker's head.

...not said...but that is 7 weeks for a shepherd!!!!

They said that considering his record that 7 weeks was fair...would normally have bee 3 to 4 weeks.

basically the panel is saying that baker dobbed himself in...

Panel said they believed Baker...but judged his action in stopping as reckless

Sheldon considering appeal...but have till noon till decide.

Sheldon sounded pretty stunned...

Listen in

Interesting... While I have been actively following the Baker report.....my wife who was at the game with me but with whom I had not discussed except when it occurred at the game when she said there was nothing in it... remarked as the Newsbreak came up that Baker had been given 7 weeks that she saw...

exactly.......they just want him guilty....now they have to write up a verdict to suit....

So no one actually sees Bakes do anything = suspended ANYONE who watch the video saw Judd eye gouge (not to mention the Hawks player heard on audio pointing it out to ump = get off scott free..... Kerr punches guy in nuts......says I was aiming for leg (still a punch is it not) = gets off scott free...

To appeal I think you have to bring up fresh evidence....

Which in this case means a St Kilda trainer with an onbscured view who saw nothing....

Worked for Freo

So bakes has in the apst been found Guilty of Attempting to strike...

and now has been found Guilty of "We don't have clue, but he is suspended anyway...lets just call it rough play!!!"

So question Sainter58 If someone smashed into the back of your head.....would not the laws of physics cause your arms ( arms pendulums) to fly up as the momentum of the impacting player causes an equal and opposite reaction???? In this case with bakes running...if he runs likea normal person I assum...

Classic case of why club officials SHOULD NOT be witnesses.......

BIAS

sainter58 wrote:
. I would say Farmer said something to him and Bakes Retaliated. .

Wow...you could tell that from the Medallion Club ????:shock:

Can you read lips...or read minds????? Or is your factual report like the freo's trainers....just based on what you "think" happened....

So my understanding is a tribunal hearing based on, not anyone seeing the incdent that someone saw baker running in a different direction that what Baker said he was...... THAT IS bulls***, even if they believe him how can someone be suspended for that. That plus it is somehow a "criminal"...

The freo trainer...whata tosser.

Basically saw nothing except Bakes running 45 degrees towards Farmer before...
Well helo sunshine.... Baker was PLAYING on him. FOOL!!!!!!!!!!


What a joke.

Based on the evidence put up....should NEVER have come to the tribunal. Is a disgrace.

maxfactor wrote:Is he not going out with GT's daughter???

maybe GT gave him a clip then....