FQF wrote:Apparently Hickey was from GWS as well?

Heard that hilarity.

Oh and Lee will be 28 soon too

Wow, that Barrett is a little c**k ain't he. Looking to put boots in at any chance

If I hear how we gave up first rd picks only for Lee and Hickey, I'll spew. So dumb these so called experts

Wankers

Bruce was all Australian u18, just was a zone selection so don't associate him with being a gun junior.

If we miss Bruce, I will be pretty disappointed. Prefer him over Longer.
A 10 year 197 cm chb not growing on trees. Certainly none in this draft.

Happy to trade fish or give 25 for him.

Longer would be a bonus in Psd.

If ya get rid of Dal, because you can get something for him Surely you get rid of fish for Bruce?? How do we get games into Delaney, Bruce, Webster, Wright, Newnes as well as Roberton Gilbert Geary Dempster. I think most Saints fans would accept losing Fisher more then Dal. I think it's our only cha...

Billings plays forward as he has those weapons too. Will be a mid who you know can rest forward and be a threat. That to me is the future, not just a mid

Love it to go that easy, reckon we might have to lose one of those early picks.

Just want to get it done. Would be a great trade period for sure

dragit wrote:

falka wrote:

Con Gorozidis wrote:I dont want to be a prick.
But chips not up for trade means noone is interested.
Who would want a 31yo with foot problems and rumours of moreton bay bugs ?

That is how I read it too. Zero interest

Nah… I think they are targeting Garlett in the draft… so will need to keep Fish as a mentor.

Haha

Con Gorozidis wrote:I dont want to be a prick.
But chips not up for trade means noone is interested.
Who would want a 31yo with foot problems and rumours of moreton bay bugs ?

That is how I read it too. Zero interest

You have to see that we have started a very strategic process to get the Saints back up the ladder again, and if you look at the trade period it has to be viewed as a success. We have added a ruckman in Longer who with Hickey will be our ruckman for the next 10 years. We will add 2 key backman in B...

It's obvious. We have pick 3 Boyd is 1 So by saying Kelly or Billings is just commenting that whoever is left at 3 will Be ours. Sharenberg will not be an afl mid billings will be go saints Ps. I'll believe it when I see it, but if we get deals done that are mooted, I'll be stoked. So what is latest...

24 and 41 for 19 maybe?

! would think that the 24-19 swap with Hawthorn will not happen. It would have been included in the new AFL draft listings after FA Our powers that be have repeatedly stated we now have our goal of 3 picks in the first 20 since the Hawk Big Mac deal so one would think its on The AFL would have to b...

GWS could take him in PSD. Gee they have pick 1

samoht wrote:Pick 26 better count.

They better play fair now nth. Take our rd 5 pick

Need Bruce from age and size profile more then longer.

Would love straight swap for fish now and keep early 20's pick

Keep dal........PLEASE X10000000.

Instead of tearing up membership, keep dal and I'll buy extra memberships.

Positive blackmail

Go Saints, Love for Dal

SaintSimmo wrote:Dal to North deal to be done tomorrow according to 7 news

As a free agent or a trade?

If it is for 26 and Delaney, reckon gws might accept that for Bruce so dal for FB and CHB

Will we land a key back or not?

Getting anxious.

Want Bruce, pre season draft not ideal, melb lurking along with other clubs

F me if we don't land a 195cm + backman this year

This whole thing is a disgrace. How long should this take? I know penalties get back dated, but there is list management issues at stake. How long do you need to mount a case? At this rate Saad will have the beat defense ever, countless surprise witnesses, 15 alibi's and the answer to several in sol...

Billings is like dal with kicking, precise left boot but can kick goals and awesome overhead. Not slow. He is our man.

Aish similar, neat disposal

Shee'd has a few q marks not top 6 pick

Christ, Elshaugh drafts them, not Pelchen

What late 3rd rd pick?

I see we have an early 3rd rd pick.

saintsrus wrote:Did Finey say anything last night re saints?
Interested in his comments on Mac considering he was adament we needed to trade him a month ago

Yeah anyone hear his thoughts, was it linked to his crazy 72 hours or not?

Stanley is a keep for me now. As for Gieles, they can have a can of coke and a Mars bar for him Facts are we do need some ready made ruck support (pierce and Holmes ready) but It has to be cheap back up eg Currie / Stephenson via rookie I reckon. Be crazy to trade 17 for Gieles effectively, where fo...